![]() |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2549539)
NMB composition matters a bit...I don't understand why you guys are hellbent on making this a political issue.
Go read flying the line. A huge reason pilots enjoy the compensation we do is ALPA's outsized political clout. Study the history. Ask AAL pilots why their pension is frozen vice terminated if you want a recent example. I guess we shouldn't be surprised that people just make things up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.232fe8a1f656 |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2550907)
Ready, fire, aim?
Enjoy your straw man game with somebody else, unless you simply quoted the wrong post.
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2551103)
I guess we shouldn't be surprised that people just make things up.
As for ALPA, they are wise enough to ignore (R) and (D), contributing to those elected officials who share ALPA's point of view. Either ALPA's making a huge mistake by making any contributions to (R)s or the belief that only (D)s will help pilots is extremely flawed. Take your pick. And feel free to keep on with the partisan commentary. |
ALPA is smart to spread the money around and focus on pilot partisan politics. And it is true that neither party do exactly what we want, but there is no comparison between how the two parties treat labor. Anyone with an ounce of legislative experience or knowledge of any labor history understands that. Andy and many right wing pilots try to create a false equivalency to rationalize their firmly held beliefs no matter how imaginary they might be.
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2551605)
ALPA is smart to spread the money around and focus on pilot partisan politics. And it is true that neither party do exactly what we want, but there is no comparison between how the two parties treat labor. Anyone with an ounce of legislative experience or knowledge of any labor history understands that. Andy and many right wing pilots try to create a false equivalency to rationalize their firmly held beliefs no matter how imaginary they might be.
|
Originally Posted by PowderFinger
(Post 2551868)
Agree 100%
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2551605)
ALPA is smart to spread the money around and focus on pilot partisan politics. And it is true that neither party do exactly what we want, but there is no comparison between how the two parties treat labor. Anyone with an ounce of legislative experience or knowledge of any labor history understands that. Andy and many right wing pilots try to create a false equivalency to rationalize their firmly held beliefs no matter how imaginary they might be.
|
Originally Posted by ugleeual
(Post 2552006)
Unions aren’t allowed to use dues for anything other than union related business. ALPA PAC (donations by its members) fund political related contributions for candidates.
|
Originally Posted by wolfmanpack
(Post 2552066)
And there is no comparison between how to the two parties fight to protect unborn children from being murdered. Each has to answer for their priorities in voting. For some of us the life of an unborn child is more important. For others it's ALPA and labor and whatever other selfish thing.
|
Originally Posted by wolfmanpack
(Post 2552066)
And there is no comparison between how to the two parties fight to protect unborn children from being murdered. Each has to answer for their priorities in voting. For some of us the life of an unborn child is more important. For others it's ALPA and labor and whatever other selfish thing.
|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 2552083)
The minute that abortion is outlawed, the R's potentially lose a hell of a lot of single-issue voters. So, don't get your hopes up. They're happy with the staus quo.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands