![]() |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720017)
Great website. I've never seen it before and don't know how accurate the numbers are...but if it's accurate, it proves my point.
Look at UAL numbers vs SWA, AA, and DL. We are lagging significantly. Just because things are "better than they have been in quite some time" doesn't mean we are keeping up with our competition. I will state again that I am very happy with this bid. I would like to see the trend turn into what SWA, DL, and now AA is seeing this year. I had no idea AA was eating our lunch too in regards to hiring numbers. Things are good, but relative to the top competition, we have a long way to go. We need to pick up the pace and start growing, and not regionally. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720017)
I would like to see the trend turn into what SWA, DL, and now AA is seeing this year. I had no idea AA was eating our lunch too in regards to hiring numbers.
UAL Scroll down to retirement numbers. American has eaten our lunch cause they have a huge wave of B Scale hires hitting retirement. It certainly isn't due to growth or foresight of some pilot crunch. The combined UAL pilot group includes the 570 and Lorenzo's Scabs where a lot will go beyond 35 year careers. Odds are we won't be touching American in hiring for a long time. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720017)
Great website. I've never seen it before and don't know how accurate the numbers are...but if it's accurate, it proves my point.
Look at UAL numbers vs SWA, AA, and DL. We are lagging significantly. Just because things are "better than they have been in quite some time" doesn't mean we are keeping up with our competition. I will state again that I am very happy with this bid. I would like to see the trend turn into what SWA, DL, and now AA is seeing this year. I had no idea AA was eating our lunch too in regards to hiring numbers. Things are good, but relative to the top competition, we have a long way to go. We need to pick up the pace and start growing, and not regionally. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2717714)
We have not grown...yet.
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2718607)
We have done this hiring since Sept of this year.
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2717714)
SWA has basically never stopped hiring
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2717714)
You do remember we stopped hiring basically from March to Sept
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2719121)
The numbers don't lie.
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720017)
Great website....but if it's accurate, it proves my point.
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2720117)
Since 2011 65 more mainline aircraft of which there is a net 33 more in the top pay band. 11,107 (11/18) - 10,188 (11/13) = 919 more active pilots than five years ago.
United will hire/recall nearly 700 pilots in 2018 with April & May being the only two months with no hiring. SWA & Air Tran only hired 200 pilots in 2.5 years after their deal closed. Nope Yep Hilarious, but don't quit your day job. Funny how you selectively edit my quote to leave out the part where I say: "You do remember we stopped hiring basically from March to Sept, with a few add classes in between?" Nice edit. Do you work for NBC news? Also, over the last 5 years, United has had a lot more retirements than DL, SWA, or AA. It's true that now retirements at the combined AA will now start to eclipse UAL for the next decade, but we're talking about what we've seen recently. According to this data on this website it looks like we've stayed on par with AA and SWA (if you don't factor in UALs increased retirement numbers), but DL has crushed everyone almost by a factor of 2. SWA and DL have had meager retirements in the last 5 years, AA has had close, but not quite as many as UAL in the last 5 years. I don't see retirement numbers on that website. If its' listed there, I can't find it. Although I can't prove it, I'm confident if you could see the hires/retired net gain over the past 5 years, then SWA and AA would have higher numbers than UAL. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720162)
Although I can't prove it...
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 2720170)
Don't let that start stopping you.
|
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720449)
Nice intelligent response. Prove me wrong.
You’re looking at “pilot hiring” as “growth”. They aren’t the same thing. We didn’t hire much the last few years because we were fat on pilots and the new administration wanted us to get leaner: same number of pilots doing more flying. It appears by the rapidly accelerating hiring that we have reached that target. As of now; we have over 175 narrowbody aircraft inbound with no stated plans for any of them being replacement. Same for several more 787’s. That’s by design, as a change in the economy will certainly bring about older aircraft being sold or lease returned. If I’ve learned anything in my 25 years here it’s that I don’t put one ounce of belief in any “growth plans”. Any airline pilot at any airline should feel the same. I’ve watched them announce 100 aircraft parkings in a single day.... more than once. |
I'm sure retirement numbers used to be on APC, but I can't get the search here to look further back than a year, but I did find a post over at flightinfo.com that had United, CAL, DL/NWA, and AA numbers on it.
https://forums.flightinfo.com/showth...ry+retirements Based on this data, which was posted back in 2010, I can only look at United vs DL, because the US Air and SWA numbers aren't posted there. Also, the USAir hiring numbers aren't posted on that other database posted earlier. So, if you just look at DL since 2013 until 2017 (since 2018 isn't over yet) The numbers come out to: Net gain in pilots UAL DAL 2013 -20 -139 2014 -48 +677 2015 +485 +680 2016 +84 +876 2017 +353 +696 That makes the total for the past 5 years where United has gained a net of +353 pilots and DL has gained a net of +2790 pilots. And yes, there were furloughs that returned at United that would obviously taint the United data and reduce hiring, but at the time,2013, all but a few CAL furloughs were back on property, and probably at least a third (guestimate) of United furloughs were already back on property, possibly more. So even if you give United an extra 1000 pilots to account for furlough returns, you still have DL doubling the "growth" of United over the past 5 years. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 2720626)
you still have DL doubling the "growth" of United pilots over the past 5 years.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:31 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands