Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Understanding and predicting profit sharing. >

Understanding and predicting profit sharing.

Search

Notices

Understanding and predicting profit sharing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2019 | 07:25 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Forgive me for sounding condescending as I am keenly aware that it infuriates people on this forum that I often claim a higher intelligence...
Reply
Old 04-19-2019 | 06:32 PM
  #32  
RJDio's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 8
From: CRJ FO
Default

A common excuse for our fractional financial performance compared to delta is their merger is 2 years, give or take, more mature than ours. So what was Delta’s profit margin/performance @ merger year 8-9?
Reply
Old 04-19-2019 | 08:13 PM
  #33  
detpilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Trying not to crash
Default

Originally Posted by Floyd
Oh. My. God. I laughed so hard!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 05:28 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by T773ER
Considering Delta has outperformed United by a factor of 3 YTD in its stock price and their market value is almost double United's, its factually incorrect to say wall street is rewarding United above all other airlines.
Yup. Not sure what that other lady was smoking.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 05:31 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
A common excuse for our fractional financial performance compared to delta is their merger is 2 years, give or take, more mature than ours. So what was Delta’s profit margin/performance @ merger year 8-9?
Common excuse? Lol. Try the management delta.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:01 AM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by RJDio
A common excuse for our fractional financial performance compared to delta is their merger is 2 years, give or take, more mature than ours. So what was Delta’s profit margin/performance @ merger year 8-9?
I’m sure Delta having something like four times less union represented employees has something to do with it.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 09:07 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P
I’m sure Delta having something like four times less union represented employees has something to do with it.
Delta had 8 less years of Tilton
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 12:04 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by N6279P
I’m sure Delta having something like four times less union represented employees has something to do with it.
Good to see your heart is in the right place. I am proud of our union brothers and sisters at United.

Look at the landing fees Delta pays and you will find most of the cash advantage. Follow that up with being able to charge more money and having better management and you will find the rest.

But feel free to blame the FAs and CSRs
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 01:34 PM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

United’s administrative (non operating) costs are higher than Delta. We outsource everything it seems, but yet still have large departments with managing and senior directors to manage the outsourcing. I’ve never seen such a bloated management structure in my life.

Years ago I was present during a civil trial where an industry expert witness was testifying about Delta’s apparent heigher costs. Delta looked bad on paper until you got into the details.

They had more staffing and costs in some departments, but turns out, they built their own aircraft tugs, forged their own compressor blades for their own JT-8 engines, etc....

United on the other hand does very little in-house, but still has higher cost structure. A good example is the Flex spendings accounts for health care. It is outsourced to Hewitt, who in turns outsources most of it to the Phillipines.... which is why it’s such a crappy deal btw. Yet there is an Managing director and staff in Chicago.

And yes, Delta’s BOD was wise to make the merged DL/NW H.Q in Atlanta where everything costs less than MSP.

UC board chose to keep the HQ in one of the highest cost cities, and most politically corrupt, in the nation.

It all adds up. And yes, DL being in Atlanta does afford them less union involvement. Do you really care? Are your yard man, plumber, barber, baker, butcher, house painter.......union members?
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 02:07 PM
  #40  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100
United’s administrative (non operating) costs are higher than Delta. We outsource everything it seems, but yet still have large departments with managing and senior directors to manage the outsourcing.
When comparing UAL to DAL, don't forget that virtually ALL of DAL's ground staff (above and below the wing) except for MX is "outsourced" to DGS (DAL Global Services). DGS employees are non-union and a majority are part-time.

Not only is it a lower actual cost of labor, but it also ends up in a separate entry from labor (pilots, FAs, Mechs) on the financial report. Meanwhile, all the UA hubs and most of the large stations are staffed by mainline employees.

One can compare UAL to DAL, but it's not apples-to-apples without moving some items around on the spreadsheet. But yes, DAL is still lower.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilotfo64
Delta
21
07-08-2015 02:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices