Understanding and predicting profit sharing.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
#36
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
I’m sure Delta having something like four times less union represented employees has something to do with it.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Look at the landing fees Delta pays and you will find most of the cash advantage. Follow that up with being able to charge more money and having better management and you will find the rest.
But feel free to blame the FAs and CSRs
#39
Banned
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
United’s administrative (non operating) costs are higher than Delta. We outsource everything it seems, but yet still have large departments with managing and senior directors to manage the outsourcing. I’ve never seen such a bloated management structure in my life.
Years ago I was present during a civil trial where an industry expert witness was testifying about Delta’s apparent heigher costs. Delta looked bad on paper until you got into the details.
They had more staffing and costs in some departments, but turns out, they built their own aircraft tugs, forged their own compressor blades for their own JT-8 engines, etc....
United on the other hand does very little in-house, but still has higher cost structure. A good example is the Flex spendings accounts for health care. It is outsourced to Hewitt, who in turns outsources most of it to the Phillipines.... which is why it’s such a crappy deal btw. Yet there is an Managing director and staff in Chicago.
And yes, Delta’s BOD was wise to make the merged DL/NW H.Q in Atlanta where everything costs less than MSP.
UC board chose to keep the HQ in one of the highest cost cities, and most politically corrupt, in the nation.
It all adds up. And yes, DL being in Atlanta does afford them less union involvement. Do you really care? Are your yard man, plumber, barber, baker, butcher, house painter.......union members?
Years ago I was present during a civil trial where an industry expert witness was testifying about Delta’s apparent heigher costs. Delta looked bad on paper until you got into the details.
They had more staffing and costs in some departments, but turns out, they built their own aircraft tugs, forged their own compressor blades for their own JT-8 engines, etc....
United on the other hand does very little in-house, but still has higher cost structure. A good example is the Flex spendings accounts for health care. It is outsourced to Hewitt, who in turns outsources most of it to the Phillipines.... which is why it’s such a crappy deal btw. Yet there is an Managing director and staff in Chicago.
And yes, Delta’s BOD was wise to make the merged DL/NW H.Q in Atlanta where everything costs less than MSP.
UC board chose to keep the HQ in one of the highest cost cities, and most politically corrupt, in the nation.
It all adds up. And yes, DL being in Atlanta does afford them less union involvement. Do you really care? Are your yard man, plumber, barber, baker, butcher, house painter.......union members?
#40
Not only is it a lower actual cost of labor, but it also ends up in a separate entry from labor (pilots, FAs, Mechs) on the financial report. Meanwhile, all the UA hubs and most of the large stations are staffed by mainline employees.
One can compare UAL to DAL, but it's not apples-to-apples without moving some items around on the spreadsheet. But yes, DAL is still lower.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



