Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Boeing resolved to make pilots obsolete. >

Boeing resolved to make pilots obsolete.

Search

Notices

Boeing resolved to make pilots obsolete.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2020 | 10:06 AM
  #61  
Shrek's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
25M+ Airline Miles
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 100
Default

Originally Posted by BoldPilot
The problem faced when people talk about this issue is that they assume computers of today are flying the airliners. Computers are being designed now to think and problem solve. A completely new era for technology will emerge. There will come a day somewhere in the far future when computers will have greater intelligence than man. Therefore a pilotless airliner is plausible.
That’s ok because the planet will be gone in roughly 10 years due to global warming
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 11:10 AM
  #62  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Guppy.
Default

Originally Posted by High on sky
The only thing malfunctions induce is a corrective action. The corrective action can either be appropriate or not.

There are exceedingly few scenarios where a malfunction, if properly responded to, might still result in aircraft damage/hull loss. So, in my opinion, an incorrect response to a malfunction is actually a greater threat to the safety of the aircraft than the malfunction itself in 99% of cases.

Therefore, if there is an accident due to improperly followed procedures, I would say it was human induced/human error/pilot error. Whatever you want to call it. The malfunction is almost meaningless at that point.

If someone steps on the wrong rudder during an engine failure and plants it in the dirt, was it the malfunctioning engine that caused the crash or improper response? If you think it’s the former, then please stay away from my flight deck.
I'm sorry that I cannot dumb it down any more for you to understand my point.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 11:25 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Go read QF32 if you think pilotless airliners are coming or are plausible.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 01:23 PM
  #64  
Inside DEENA's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
^ ^ ^

FWIW, that A320 is doing exactly what the pilot commanded.

Is there any pilot out there, except perhaps for the one who was flying that day, who thinks full stall demonstrations are a good idea at very low altitudes? Every single Boeing ever made would have also ended up in the trees.
Ummm, they were executing a flyby (in full landing configuration) , and when they tried to actually go around the computer overrode them and drove them into the trees.

Not sure where you got the idea they were doing stalls.

ID
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 01:45 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Default

Originally Posted by Inside DEENA
Ummm, they were executing a flyby (in full landing configuration) , and when they tried to actually go around the computer overrode them and drove them into the trees.

Not sure where you got the idea they were doing stalls.

ID

Not exactly. Yes they were doing a low approach, but they got way lower than planned, didn’t realize (they weren’t charted) that there were big trees at the end of the runway. The power was in the bucket and the spool up time was too late plus they were behind the power curve.

Have you actually flown the bus? Under no circumstances will the computer “override” a TO/GA commanded thrust. Yes, I have had instances where the motors “seemed” like they weren’t responding because they were spooling down and it took a second to get them going again in the other direction but it will never override anything you do within the realms of the flight envelope protection (pitch, roll and speed/AOA). If anything the motors feel stuck at max thrust in TOGA lock after a wind shear escape if you hit Alpha prot.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 03:10 PM
  #66  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Inside DEENA
Ummm, they were executing a flyby (in full landing configuration) , and when they tried to actually go around the computer overrode them and drove them into the trees.

ID
Absolutely false.

They had all the power they needed all they had to do was manually push the throttles up to Flex or TOGA.

They thought that the auto thrust system was going to maintain selected speed for the fly by. They got so low that the auto thrust system went into landing mode.

If they had flown the pass with the auto thrust system turned off they would have had normal manual throttles.

If they would have shut off the auto thrust with the throttle switches or the auto thrust button the thrust would have immediately jumped up to commanded throttle position.


By time they figured out that the auto thrust system was no longer providing commanded speed it was to late.

If you watch the video the engines come up to full power just as the airplane starts to eat the trees.

Also if you watch the you tube video with the narrator that talks about the first fully automated airplane.. Everything he says is technically and factually incorrect.

The “computer” did not and cannot override manual throttle movements once moved out of the auto thrust engagement range.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 03:29 PM
  #67  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Absolutely false.

They had all the power they needed all they had to do was manually push the throttles up to Flex or TOGA.

They thought that the auto thrust system was going to maintain selected speed for the fly by. They got so low that the auto thrust system went into landing mode.

If they had flown the pass with the auto thrust system turned off they would have had normal manual throttles.

If they would have shut off the auto thrust with the throttle switches or the auto thrust button the thrust would have immediately jumped up to commanded throttle position.


By time they figured out that the auto thrust system was no longer providing commanded speed it was to late.

If you watch the video the engines come up to full power just as the airplane starts to eat the trees.

Also if you watch the you tube video with the narrator that talks about the first fully automated airplane.. Everything he says is technically and factually incorrect.

The “computer” did not and cannot override manual throttle movements once moved out of the auto thrust engagement range.
^ ^ ^
This

At every point in the sequence the airplanes did EXACTLY what the pilots commanded.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 03:46 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Absolutely false.

They had all the power they needed all they had to do was manually push the throttles up to Flex or TOGA.

They thought that the auto thrust system was going to maintain selected speed for the fly by. They got so low that the auto thrust system went into landing mode.

If they had flown the pass with the auto thrust system turned off they would have had normal manual throttles.

If they would have shut off the auto thrust with the throttle switches or the auto thrust button the thrust would have immediately jumped up to commanded throttle position.


By time they figured out that the auto thrust system was no longer providing commanded speed it was to late.


If you watch the video the engines come up to full power just as the airplane starts to eat the trees.

Also if you watch the you tube video with the narrator that talks about the first fully automated airplane.. Everything he says is technically and factually incorrect.

The “computer” did not and cannot override manual throttle movements once moved out of the auto thrust engagement range.


It has never ceased to amaze me how Airbus pilots time and time again absolutely butcher the Habsheim crash. Your post is no different. The ENTIRE bolded portion is patently false and did not happen as you describe it. You are misinformed on how that crew made that approach and what position the throttles were in.
Reply
Old 01-06-2020 | 05:30 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
It has never ceased to amaze me how Airbus pilots time and time again absolutely butcher the Habsheim crash. Your post is no different. The ENTIRE bolded portion is patently false and did not happen as you describe it. You are misinformed on how that crew made that approach and what position the throttles were in.
Lol Airhoss is a keyboard expert on all things aviation, he has like 4000+ post, how dare you disagree with him!!
Reply
Old 01-07-2020 | 04:39 AM
  #70  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Hatesheavys
Lol Airhoss is a keyboard expert on all things aviation, he has like 4000+ post, how dare you disagree with him!!
Given your post count from your joining date you are on track to be a keyboard expert in elven years too! We all need our hero’s, keep up the hard work and you’ll get there.

Just FYI I’m one of the few guys on here that will admit when I make a mistake. You are welcome to disagree with me.

Last edited by Airhoss; 01-07-2020 at 04:52 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flogger
GoJet
41
10-01-2022 06:29 PM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices