Pvsl2
10-09-2020 | 07:03 AM
#21
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
10-09-2020 | 08:17 AM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Surprised? Really? Of all people that’s a bold statement coming from you. IIRC you we’re one of those trumpeting how great EO2 was and that alone was reason enough to vote this LoA in. Well, don’t be so shocked when many more of your prophesies don’t come true wrt this LOA. I do admire your honesty though. As for me, not surprised at all that many EOs were left on the table.
10-09-2020 | 09:20 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
see that argument doesn’t make any sense to me.
if 4000 pilots had been furloughed without this TA, then wouldn’t they be paying for you to keep 70 hours MPG? Wouldn’t they be paying for those 363 to still be employed? Wouldn’t they be paying to keep the company afloat?
The pilot group is always paying somehow it’s just a matter of who is paying and how much.
if 4000 pilots had been furloughed without this TA, then wouldn’t they be paying for you to keep 70 hours MPG? Wouldn’t they be paying for those 363 to still be employed? Wouldn’t they be paying to keep the company afloat?
The pilot group is always paying somehow it’s just a matter of who is paying and how much.
10-09-2020 | 09:32 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
You also realize these EO2s don’t create any movement wrt the seniority list or at least not for a couple years until they actually are retired. This is another one of those little gems in the LOA to keep the lower 1/3 in the lower 1/3. They take the EO, we pay for it and we don’t even move up in seniority. I call it a loss.
10-09-2020 | 09:39 AM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
You also realize these EO2s don’t create any movement wrt the seniority list or at least not for a couple years until they actually are retired. This is another one of those little gems in the LOA to keep the lower 1/3 in the lower 1/3. They take the EO, we pay for it and we don’t even move up in seniority. I call it a loss.
However, your point is valid and it is a HUGE negative and it’s one of the items I was displeased with
10-09-2020 | 09:49 AM
#27
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
You also realize these EO2s don’t create any movement wrt the seniority list or at least not for a couple years until they actually are retired. This is another one of those little gems in the LOA to keep the lower 1/3 in the lower 1/3. They take the EO, we pay for it and we don’t even move up in seniority. I call it a loss.
Somebody's gotta fill the seat.
Also, I saw some 53 year olds (maybe a few even younger and good on 'em!). So they don't move the list technically for 2 years. But then they sure do.
10-10-2020 | 04:20 PM
#28
Get me outta here...
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: Boeing right seat
Everybody has their reasons for staying an extra 24 months or less rather than taking the offer... but I didn't expect that many would.
10-10-2020 | 05:09 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
