![]() |
I do really like the CRJ-550 as it fixes a lot of the issues with the CRJ-200. Newer, first class and economy plus seats, and WiFi. It burns about 8% more fuel than a CRJ-200, but fuel is cheap, and just a few % revenue premium for having first class and economy plus seats more than make up for it. I’m surprised United hasn’t replaced all the CRJ-200’s with CRJ-550’s.
I do see the CRJ-200 going away in the next few years, but I definitely do not see 50 seat RJ’s going away. |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 3173385)
I do really like the CRJ-550 as it fixes a lot of the issues with the CRJ-200. Newer, first class and economy plus seats, and WiFi. It burns about 8% more fuel than a CRJ-200, but fuel is cheap, and just a few % revenue premium for having first class and economy plus seats more than make up for it. I’m surprised United hasn’t replaced all the CRJ-200’s with CRJ-550’s.
I do see the CRJ-200 going away in the next few years, but I definitely do not see 50 seat RJ’s going away. |
Originally Posted by iahflyr
(Post 3173385)
I do really like the CRJ-550 as it fixes a lot of the issues with the CRJ-200. Newer, first class and economy plus seats, and WiFi. It burns about 8% more fuel than a CRJ-200, but fuel is cheap, and just a few % revenue premium for having first class and economy plus seats more than make up for it. I’m surprised United hasn’t replaced all the CRJ-200’s with CRJ-550’s.
I do see the CRJ-200 going away in the next few years, but I definitely do not see 50 seat RJ’s going away. |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3173450)
I just rode on one for the first time, it is ten million times better than the typical fifty seat disgraceful experience that gets foisted on the traveling public.
Jeeze. |
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3173143)
The 200’s have a lot of life left in them.
|
Originally Posted by Huell
(Post 3173471)
Come on Joe ... you have been told a billion times not to exaggerate.
Jeeze. |
Boeing is desperate for sales and need to repair their image and that of the max. I wonder if we could get some dirt cheap max 7’s and use that lift to retire the CRJ-200 and E-145. Starting in 2023, the smallest plane in Delta’s fleet will have 70 seats. Are we going to put a bunch of worn out 50 seaters up against that and expect to win? My bet is that we don’t change a thing and Kirby comes to us in a couple of years demanding more big rj’s to remain competitive when Delta is spanking us again.
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3173832)
Starting in 2023, the smallest plane in Delta’s fleet will have 70 seats. Are we going to put a bunch of worn out 50 seaters up against that and expect to win?
|
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3173835)
Didn't UAL (via Oscar and Scott) directly and publicly state the 50-seaters are going away as a result of Covid earlier this year with the exception of the 'new' 550s?
|
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3173450)
I just rode on one for the first time, it is ten million times better than the typical fifty seat disgraceful experience that gets foisted on the traveling public.
I don't know how old you are. I'm 55, and I remember riding on commuter flights in the late 1970s in airplanes like the Twin Otter and Beech 99. Those were replaced by the Metroliner, Beech 1900, and the Jetstream. (I flew the J32 Jetstreams in my first airline job) Then came the Saab 340, Brasilia, Dash 8 and we had a flight attendant! I even got to ride on a couple of four-engine Dash-7s, operated by Rio Airways, as a teenager! The introduction of the CRJ-200 and E145 was a huge step forward, at the time, to actually be flying a jet. But it's time for them to join the Twin Otters and Metroliners to make way for their successors. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands