Cares 3 and full April schedules
My Spidey senses are tingling.
|
Word is if this passes; is it MPG until September 30?
|
Not sure the meaning of “Full April Schedules”. There was a CCS message about this already. PBS has already been loaded for 45% bucket per LOA. (Reduced work & credit hours by seniority bucket.) Once Biden signs CARES 3, April pay will be reconciled to UPA credit guarantees. In other words, April becomes a “partial work, full pay” month.
|
Quote:
There was a CCS message about possiblly adjusting PBS timelines. |
Quote:
Making April "full work, full pay" is not beneficial to UAL pilot currency; besides why not enjoy one last month of getting paid for 70 hours (ultimately) and only working 30-60 depending on where you sit. |
Quote:
|
Vacancy opens today and looks like the vacancy for closed categories will open later on this month.
Paul’s update is up on FT now. |
Quote:
This just arrived in my inbox. April PBS Reset In anticipation of enactment of the American Rescue Plan that includes the Payroll Support Program for airlines, ALPA is working with the Company on an agreement to forego building April lines under reduced-work provisions and instead proceed with full-month PBS bidding. This would mean full UPA minimum pay guarantees and line construction rules would remain in effect for April and beyond. Further details from the System Scheduling Committee will be released as soon as possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Cares Act is, or was, working in my favor. If the LOA is so great why is the MC trying to get away from it now. It cuts both ways. In January I worked 45 hours got paid 70. Looked like the same setup for April until the rug was pulled out by the MC. Also, if you actually read my posts on here my complaint about the LOA was not about the reduced MPGs. I actually don't mind that part of the LOA. My complaint was about the paycut we are taking in vacation months because of the 2:20 MPG multiplier and how that was purposely omitted during the sales job. Under the LOA we are taking a paycut in vacation months yet we were repeatedly told, there are no paycuts. That is why I voted no. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Because the company was using layoffs as leverage for free money but they really need us in the cockpit. They didn't think it was gonna take this long to fleece the taxpayers and LOA kicked in screwing them. Now ALPA is covering as usual! Just my guess.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ingraining the mentality at a young age so they expect it later in their career. |
Except that other thing we got to vote on. This is unilateral contravention of the LOA provisions. And your stupid opinion counts just as much as any other stupid opinion, assuming you’re in good standing,
|
It doesn’t matter if you voted yea or nay for the loa. All of us have the right to expect the agreement will be followed. It is the agreement ...good or bad. Personal feelings aside it applies to all of us.
the argument that (you didn’t vote for it so shut up ) doesn’t work in a functioning representative democracy of our union.( or any other political system for that matter) rules should apply to all. Regardless of vote. |
I personally I’m very grateful to both the rank-and-file Union volunteers and our MEC leadership, but this one is a bit confusing to me. It kind of reminds me of when we were mandated to wear vests on walk rounds… And ALPA said “ this was our idea, and you’re welcome”
also, if you don’t like Todd‘s grandstanding around the LOA… Maybe also reconsider that announcement some guys make during deplaning: “we got you here 10 minutes early… You’re welcome.” Always sounded a little funny to me. More likely to come off as gloating, than engender gratitude |
So you guys are *****ing about having to work a full schedule for the full pay you are going to get? Think about how that plays with the taxpayer paying our salaries right now.
|
Quote:
I want United succeed, I think Kirby is a great guy… But when they dropped my Hong Kong ferry flight and tried to reassign me… I did not pick up my phone, I PDRed the “missed trip” and got paid to stay home. it doesn’t seem like people are confused why the company would want to do this… Or if they are well within their rights, I think it is more of a question why ALPA would be endorsing this action. |
No I’m not an airline pilot. I’m a 15 year old jerking off in my moms basement. The point is people are complaining about how they will get full pay and actually have to work a full schedule. I have no idea if the loa allows for this or not, but this is one area where it might be wise to keep it to yourself.
headline: UAL pilots complain about having to work a full schedule. that will go over well |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anything that I can do to help my family is what I am doing. In my reality I just gotta work smarter; and not harder. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Crisis averted. Check CCS or your inbox for message from the MEC.
April will be a LOA month with paragraph S to follow. We can now return to invigorating APC discussions of politics, religion, and crew meals. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Are they by chance Airline Pilots with a Union and a CBA that contained a monthly pay guarantee? Do they have an ATP worth well over 100K in their pockets? I am not without compassion, but there are apples and there are watermelons. |
Quote:
I know there are a lot of people out there who’ve lost a much bigger piece of a lot less than I make to begin with; and been given a lot less in return. It isn’t fair. Still, when the waiter brings free appetizers to the table, I don’t jump up & say “actually, I’d like to pay full price for these”, which is how I saw the initial MEC email. Maybe they were trying to gain something else on our behalf through that offer- I guess we’ll never know. There was no benefit to the pilots that I could discern from a decision like that, which made it an odd communication from our union representation in my opinion, but no harm no foul, I guess. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All of this really sounds like the teachers Union debacle going on. Wow not really like, but the same outcome.
Yours or other peoples Grandkids and Great Grandkids will be paying back this Bailout cuz it will never be paid back by the recipients. Thanks does specifically go to them that become taxpayers. *Granted, some folks believe their current taxes pay for it now. This bailout debt is well above and beyond status quo. And when folks argue “essential transportation” it definitely needs to be protected but to what extent... And essential dictates what is critically required to function, nothing else... Its a great deal no doubt, but just enjoy life as much as you can and not try to justify it. Have fun, carry on. |
Quote:
And I never said, "most Americans have sat at home and collected full pay". |
Quote:
Would teachers and their Union contracts be apples to apples, but then again they really don’t make any money as a business BUT control a strangle hold on the future/mental gains and health of many. Let’s all get back to work as we open up once again and that seems to be happening bit by bit. It’s not just optics, reality has hit harder for far more people than we care to imagine. |
Quote:
The min guarantee is in effect in good times and in bad times. |
Quote:
|
The sad fact is government has swung commie with totalitarian lockdowns, propagandized media, and fake elections. The guys who asked "what can I do for my country" got did by their country. The more money they put into it, the more they were screwed by the people who asked "what can my country do for me". Goodbye, small business owners.
It seems the majority of Americans would rather print dollars nonstop according to this new "people's economy" theory (author Stephanie Melton) where deficit spending is the economic prime mover and inflation is reigned in by tax, aka a command economy. You can't blame them, they couldn't work. But look at what asset prices have done despite the most unproductive economic year in a lifetime. Stocks, crypto, and real estate are all up up up. If your primary economic contribution is labor valued in dollars, sorry, sucks to be you. Maybe that min-wage increase will come through. Or maybe have another stimulus. Here's your dollar. No products or services were injected into the economy for you to spend it on since no one was at work. Rather enjoy driving up those assets for people who already didn't have to work. Either that or spend it on something you need to live before that dollar devalues completely, in which case "hooray" a stimulus has occured. So now we have a feeding frenzy on these dollars that come from the legislature rather than from the creation of goods and services. I'm just not eager to provide real services in exchange for that. Lots of free money out there, as there should be, since nothing of value was created. |
wow That's something right there.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons
Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands