![]() |
Allow me to briefly tread near the kool aid drinker line and say hells yeah to this bid!
ok, back to cynical, bitter and jaded... carry on |
Originally Posted by mtnlife89
(Post 3213405)
For outsiders hoping to get on someday, does this mean no new hires until February of 2022?
|
Originally Posted by FlyPurdue
(Post 3213423)
Wr have quite a few unfilled vacancies across the system right now that would go to new hires, this new vacancy is for the assumption that international capacity will be closer to 2019 levels in 2022.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3213406)
no it guarantees new hires this fall at the latest. We need to start training sooner than later or there will shortages in the summer of 2022z
|
Did another vacancy get posted today creating even more vacant positions? RST is reporting some type of “fix it” letter going out to applicants the last day or two. Hopefully interviews on the horizon?
|
Originally Posted by Jetdriver93
(Post 3213533)
Did another vacancy get posted today creating even more vacant positions? RST is reporting some type of “fix it” letter going out to applicants the last day or two. Hopefully interviews on the horizon?
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3213225)
The town hall will most likely consist of a bunch of core 4 and DEI sound bites followed by some cherry picked softball questions.
|
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 3213692)
Diversity, Inclusion, Equity.....Those are all buzz words for hiring lower qualified people. DIE. I guess if the shoe fits.
Get quality people by casting a wide net. Attract them, vet them, train them wherever they come from through programs like AVIATE or our RJ feed, military, etc, but stop pretending the old way that produced pictures of newhire or graduation photos from **any desirable profession from the mid 20th century** of a group of 99% white guys (docs, lawyers, pilots, professors, etc, etc) was ever a good thing. That said I think UAL is presently doing better in this aspect than most and I have not heard of newhire quality/competence issues from the line. We're hiring darn good people from all corners. |
Originally Posted by Chuck D
(Post 3213803)
Ugh, find another place for that discussion. Seriously. Not even remotely a conversation that's going to be constructive in this sort of forum. Let's just get back to pure nepotism because that's always going to find the best candidate. One way or another if all we attract is pasty white guys (present company included) with a pile of LORs from their squadron buddy system or RJ cadre, we've got a real problem.
Get quality people by casting a wide net. Attract them, vet them, train them wherever they come from through programs like AVIATE or our RJ feed, military, etc, but stop pretending the old way that produced pictures of newhire or graduation photos from **any desirable profession from the mid 20th century** of a group of 99% white guys (docs, lawyers, pilots, professors, etc, etc) was ever a good thing. That said I think UAL is presently doing better in this aspect than most and I have not heard of newhire quality/competence issues from the line. We're hiring darn good people from all corners. |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 3213692)
Diversity, Inclusion, Equity.....Those are all buzz words for hiring lower qualified people. DIE. I guess if the shoe fits.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands