![]() |
Originally Posted by Mooner
(Post 3544871)
Another Delta guy here… I also think this time is different. There is something tangible to reference, the Delta AIP. It isn’t the end all, but it’s the dye that will be used to pattern bargain with for United and American.
If I were on the United MEC, I wouldn’t need to know whether the United pilots would vote in favor of Delta’s contractual value. That’s a given and largely will capped at that value plus some marginal gain. What I would need to know is if a choice between compensation and “QOL” must be made at some point, which one should the money go to? Which QOL items absolutely have to be improved? I would hope the survey would address that question. Also, I would hope that survey would explore the question of time and perceived risk going forward. That is a very real and legitimate concern with some, and zero concern for others. I can only say that regardless of how people perceive time risk, I would hope there would be a desire to get the deal done in an expedited manner. |
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
(Post 3544697)
For 100% of the new hires…I can’t see how any of them have any trust in this complete s show. This will take years to build back. Embarrassing and pathetic.
1. New hire and yeah, my perception is that our union is embarrassing. 2. Tone down the comrade bull**** narrative. The guy who talked to our new hire class poorly represented the union and why a union was necessary. A pilot union makes sense from a safety aspect and a niche profession of extremely and expensively trained and maintained persons. Hit that, not the fellowship, fraternal, and comrade talk. I don’t need the emotional argument. 3. The union mentors have been great. Later, after probation, someone having my back if something goes south is going to feel comforting. For safety issues someone has to have our voice. To be clear, I believe a union is necessary in our profession. 4. The union folks conducting contract talks feels like a ****ing joke and worse it feels like a bunch of old crusty guys who are more concerned with fixing things up for them and no ****s given for the younger guys. “But you’ll have a better QOL in 10 years” doesn’t sound that great to me. 5. The lack of comm from previous committees seems to have driven this newer one to too actively seek information and it creates wasted time. At this point, ask for the moon, use the Delta contract as the benchmark, and find a place somewhere between the moon and the Delta contract. 6. Frankly, it looks like management is frustrated dealing with amateur hour. …and it does look like amateur hour. Look, I’m a non voting/non paying member right now and I’m aware that I know little and have much to learn. Since the comment was made, I thought I’d tell you what my, admittedly, uninformed perception was right now of our union, their methods, the frustrating stagnation, the lack of direction, over communicating through worthless emails, and poor process management of this debacle. All the other stuff the union does is great so far though. I really hope to see our folks get their feet under them and start running. |
Originally Posted by Spartacusbob
(Post 3546953)
Late reply-sorry.
1. New hire and yeah, my perception is that our union is embarrassing. 2. Tone down the comrade bull**** narrative. The guy who talked to our new hire class poorly represented the union and why a union was necessary. A pilot union makes sense from a safety aspect and a niche profession of extremely and expensively trained and maintained persons. Hit that, not the fellowship, fraternal, and comrade talk. I don’t need the emotional argument. 3. The union mentors have been great. Later, after probation, someone having my back if something goes south is going to feel comforting. For safety issues someone has to have our voice. To be clear, I believe a union is necessary in our profession. 4. The union folks conducting contract talks feels like a ****ing joke and worse it feels like a bunch of old crusty guys who are more concerned with fixing things up for them and no ****s given for the younger guys. “But you’ll have a better QOL in 10 years” doesn’t sound that great to me. 5. The lack of comm from previous committees seems to have driven this newer one to too actively seek information and it creates wasted time. At this point, ask for the moon, use the Delta contract as the benchmark, and find a place somewhere between the moon and the Delta contract. 6. Frankly, it looks like management is frustrated dealing with amateur hour. …and it does look like amateur hour. Look, I’m a non voting/non paying member right now and I’m aware that I know little and have much to learn. Since the comment was made, I thought I’d tell you what my, admittedly, uninformed perception was right now of our union, their methods, the frustrating stagnation, the lack of direction, over communicating through worthless emails, and poor process management of this debacle. All the other stuff the union does is great so far though. I really hope to see our folks get their feet under them and start running. The mentor program is an example of how the triangle is supposed to work, I’m glad it has helped you. Give it time, the rest will follow. |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3547000)
Welcome to United. Unfortunately, you are seeing the by-product of a union that completely pi**ed on the concept of the upside down triangle under the previous MC/MEC due to personal ambitions. The ship is turning, admittedly slow, but it IS happening.
The mentor program is an example of how the triangle is supposed to work, I’m glad it has helped you. Give it time, the rest will follow. |
Originally Posted by GPullR
(Post 3547042)
The problem with this union is it's inceatual. We just keep recycling these super old/senior people. People get thrown out and names from the past come back to life. They all need to go. I don't care if everybody in the union has been here less then 5 years. For some many years all we heard was how great UAL ALPA was. It's been nothing but a joke for a long time.
|
Originally Posted by RaginCajun
(Post 3544797)
Didn’t DALPA hire professional negotiators?
No, they didn’t. But, they have access to the same professional negotiators (ALPA attorneys), SMEs, etc. as we do. What DAL does have that UAL lacks is an informed and unified pilot group. Happily, that tide is shifting at UAL, though. |
Originally Posted by jdavk
(Post 3547596)
Not this again!
No, they didn’t. But, they have access to the same professional negotiators (ALPA attorneys), SMEs, etc. as we do. What DAL does have that UAL lacks is an informed and unified pilot group. Happily, that tide is shifting at UAL, though. we are ready to walk the line for a great contract |
Tumi 3.0
Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
(Post 3547624)
Contrary to the *unearned* reputation new hires get… we are ready to walk the line for a great contract
|
Originally Posted by jdavk
(Post 3547630)
That plus TUMI 1.0 are two of the biggest reasons why the pilots’ attitudes are shifting at UAL, IMO.
|
Originally Posted by UALFlyer
(Post 3547676)
I can't wait until the spin starts that the ****ty first pass was just to get the membership fired up. Was the plan the whole time. Blah, blah, blah...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands