Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Template or Starting Point (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/141124-template-starting-point.html)

HiPlaneDrifter 01-15-2023 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by horrido27 (Post 3570567)
GREAT Post.
I understand I get a bit of flak about "always" grouping pilots into 3 categories.. LUAL, LCAL and Post Merger.
History needs to be communicated here.

Prior to UPA2012, LCAL (to my understanding) did not have any sort of FSB. But I do believe we had "looser" Reassignment rules. At the same time, this was also pre 117 and I also don't think we were doing the long haul flying like we are doing now.
So, as Hedley asked- What is a solution?
I agree that FSB sucks. But why does it suck? Is it cause of the way scheduling arbitrarily assigns it? Is it because it doesnt give Add Pay? Is it because (as Pilots), some don't want to work on Reserve?
This discussion has shown that some actually don't mind it, some HATE it, and others (many) are indifferent to it.

I understand WHY we have it, just expect to be compensated for it. You put on your uniform and have to sit at the airport for a few hours, ok.. but it should net you some Add Pay (1hr).
Our Long Haul, International WideBody Trips net the company boocoo bucks (look it up, younger generation! LOL). Having a pilot(s) sitting FSB is their form of insurance. OK. But FUPM>
As someone mentioned- Would love to see the stats on
Bases breakdown on FSB
Fleets
Seats
And then, usage.

Ironically, when I look at EWR today, I see 4 pilots (on what I assume are FSB's- 13P & 10P) One A320 crew, and one 737/Guppy! crew.
Again, we can argue the merits of those 4 slots- but maybe it's a good deal for them if they get used.. or maybe it's a bad deal if they get used. Either way, they SHOULD have gotten 1 hour of ADD Pay (in my opinion) and there NEEDS to be transparency on those assignments.
Also a bit strange as they AREN'T the International stuff I thought they would be scared of canceling and need protecting. Maybe they are more worried about the massive Narrow Body flying we have and they just feel those 2 times are strategic for those aircraft..
Maybe something else we NEED to have is set FSB times and therefore, everyone knows.., m-f at 10am there's always a FSB on the the 73Guppy~ etc..

Till ILC23, be well..
Always
Motch


Scheduling builds whatever is legal. Manipulating times for legality. On my fleet/seat you will see a combination of as many SC/FSB as they can build and assign. It doesn’t seem to matter what the flying schedule may look like or forecast weather. There are days when they have zero…because they don’t have anyone available. There are days when they’ll have a combination of 8 pilots on SC/FSB with nothing assignable because they can. There is no disincentive for them not to so they max out available pilots. In 2yrs I bet I haven’t been on 4 LCs. I’ve seen 6hr SC assignments on last day of reserve built specifically for me. If you’re local it sucks. If you commute it sucks more. If a trip is legal to assign in your RAP they’ll assign it to you rather than to someone with more crew rest. They will call you outside your phone window to see if you’ll answer it. Zero luck on early releases to catch a flight home. They will try to work you beyond your RAP. That’s reserve in a nutshell.

ThumbsUp 01-15-2023 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by WeiserTraffic (Post 3571828)
This would be one of the most important items to me if I were a prospective new hire. A huge part of QOL is schedule flexibility and to have a beautiful bright light at the end of the reserve tunnel is final piece most of us would need in order to see UAL as the obvious no-brainer destination.


This affects everyone, not just reserves. The ability to trade and drop is predicated solely on the staffing of reserves. Definitely needs to be reigned in.

WeiserTraffic 01-15-2023 03:19 PM


Originally Posted by ThumbsUp (Post 3571916)
This affects everyone, not just reserves. The ability to trade and drop is predicated solely on the staffing of reserves. Definitely needs to be reigned in.

Agreed and this is exactly my point. I suppose I could’ve explained my thoughts a bit more clearly; the “beautiful bright light” would mean that after gaining enough seniority to hold a line, one could expect to be able to trade/drop since the new contract could specify rules for minimum reserve coverage. This would be a major win-win.

ThumbsUp 01-15-2023 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by WeiserTraffic (Post 3572138)
Agreed and this is exactly my point. I suppose I could’ve explained my thoughts a bit more clearly; the “beautiful bright light” would mean that after gaining enough seniority to hold a line, one could expect to be able to trade/drop since the new contract could specify rules for minimum reserve coverage. This would be a major win-win.


Gotcha. Pass it on to your reps. The guys on the NC wouldn't know a trade or drop unless it had something to do with FTFPL.

WeiserTraffic 01-15-2023 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by ThumbsUp (Post 3572185)
Gotcha. Pass it on to your reps. The guys on the NC wouldn't know a trade or drop unless it had something to do with FTFPL.

I would love to but I have to at least get an interview first! :P

jdavk 01-16-2023 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by horrido27 (Post 3570567)
Prior to UPA2012, LCAL (to my understanding) did not have any sort of FSB.

Yeah, we did, it was just called something different (ARC - Airport Ready Crew).


Originally Posted by horrido27 (Post 3570567)
boocoo bucks (look it up, younger generation! LOL).

If you want anyone to look it up you should probably get closer to the correct spelling! LOL

horrido27 01-16-2023 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by Jersey (Post 3570745)
1 hr add pay for FSB didn't we just shoot that down in tumi TA. How about 5hr add pay and voluntary for SC and FSB maybe that'll get my vote. Line holder should get 5hr add pay for each leg reassigned until back on original schedule. Think bigger people.

For those who were screaming about United and Field Stand By.. seems Delta will now have it too, thought by another name and different rules.

Voluntary Airport Standby (23.EE)
Offered, not forced. Seems it pays 3 hours if not used, 3 hours plus trip if used. 6 hours at the airport and need to depart immediately if used.

Also seems that their reserves got a few more days off (1 or 2 based on monthly line credit).

I understand that everyone is probably rushing to Section 3 (compensation).. but said it before-
Rate PLUS work rules PLUS soft pay PLUS Retirement = Total Compensation

let the games begin,
be interesting to see what the final numbers are (at Delta), but don’t see this failing.

Always
Motch

hummingbear 01-16-2023 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by horrido27 (Post 3572860)
Voluntary Airport Standby (23.EE)
Offered, not forced. Seems it pays 3 hours if not used, 3 hours plus trip if used. 6 hours at the airport and need to depart immediately if used.

Possible unpopular opinion, I think 3 hours & pay not dependent on used/unused is in the ballpark. The TUMI 1 hour would not have been worth my time, but I’d probably pick them up from time to time at 3/per.

But seriously 01-16-2023 06:51 PM


Originally Posted by hummingbear (Post 3572871)
Possible unpopular opinion, I think 3 hours & pay not dependent on used/unused is in the ballpark. The TUMI 1 hour would not have been worth my time, but I’d probably pick them up from time to time at 3/per.

I don’t know why this would be an unpopular opinion. If there are enough people to voluntarily pickup all the FSBs for the ADD pay, then no one gets them who doesn’t actually want them. Everyone wins.

jdavk 01-16-2023 07:21 PM


Originally Posted by horrido27 (Post 3570567)
LCAL (to my understanding) did not have any sort of FSB.

We did but it was called ARC (Airport Ready Crew) at the time.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands