![]() |
MCO base
Just looking for more info about this base, the schedule, reserves lines, and if there is some rumors, the possibility for the base to grow and any talks about having WB there in the future.
|
Is it too late for the union to use the new base openings (or not) as contract leverage?
|
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 3635444)
Is it too late for the union to use the new base openings (or not) as contract leverage?
|
Thus far there are 3 data points on mco
1) may schedule 2) june schedule 3) slight growth seen on recent base bid None of this really points toward anything actionable beyond “yeah, there’s a 737 base in mco” The company said mco was not a hub for the airline operation - just a convenient place to keep pilots. Mco flying will start and finish with a hub leg. No new routes. The company has commented extensively on other potential narrowbody bases and the unifying theme has been “if the numbers work”. There has been zero official inside discussion of a non-hub widebody base. |
Originally Posted by Brickfire
(Post 3635491)
Thus far there are 3 data points on mco
1) may schedule 2) june schedule 3) slight growth seen on recent base bid None of this really points toward anything actionable beyond “yeah, there’s a 737 base in mco” The company said mco was not a hub for the airline operation - just a convenient place to keep pilots. Mco flying will start and finish with a hub leg. No new routes. The company has commented extensively on other potential narrowbody bases and the unifying theme has been “if the numbers work”. There has been zero official inside discussion of a non-hub widebody base. |
Originally Posted by ETFtwpD
(Post 3635514)
Thanks for the info. How senior did the left seat go?
|
Originally Posted by Brickfire
(Post 3635491)
Thus far there are 3 data points on mco
1) may schedule 2) june schedule 3) slight growth seen on recent base bid None of this really points toward anything actionable beyond “yeah, there’s a 737 base in mco” The company said mco was not a hub for the airline operation - just a convenient place to keep pilots. Mco flying will start and finish with a hub leg. No new routes. The company has commented extensively on other potential narrowbody bases and the unifying theme has been “if the numbers work”. There has been zero official inside discussion of a non-hub widebody base. When you say will start and finish with a hub leg, meaning one of the legs will fly into a UA hub? But start and finish in MCO? |
Originally Posted by aznpilot87
(Post 3635699)
Thank you
When you say will start and finish with a hub leg, meaning one of the legs will fly into a UA hub? But start and finish in MCO? |
Originally Posted by aznpilot87
(Post 3635699)
Thank you
When you say will start and finish with a hub leg, meaning one of the legs will fly into a UA hub? But start and finish in MCO? Historically, outstation based results in a lot of un-commutable trips. I haven’t looked at the bid packages for MCO and LAS (outliner due to number of red eyes). |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3635745)
If you are familiar with how outbases worked at the regionals, it will operate in a similar fashion. Trip will always start with a leg to fly to a hub to get the crew into the system then finish with leg from a hub to base.
Historically, outstation based results in a lot of un-commutable trips. I haven’t looked at the bid packages for MCO and LAS (outliner due to number of red eyes). I hope there is growth out of MCO in the future. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands