Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
SKs Comments About Lack of Upgrades >

SKs Comments About Lack of Upgrades

Search

Notices

SKs Comments About Lack of Upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2023 | 12:03 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by ytumama
I don’t see anyone being forced to upgrade in that AIP. Much less new hires.
You're giving me flashbacks to the Tumi roadshow.
"We don't think that the company will do that." - BH
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 12:26 PM
  #32  
dmeg13021's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 927
Likes: 110
Default

I foresee an LOA 6 months after contract implementation to deal with still unfilled CA vacancies.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 12:54 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 399
Likes: 49
Default

Originally Posted by dmeg13021
I foresee an LOA 6 months after contract implementation to deal with still unfilled CA vacancies.
Oracle?……..
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 02:57 PM
  #34  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 70
Likes: 8
Default

Personally I do not see the AIP fixing the problem at United. WB FO looks too attractive by comparison.

More flexibility for junior NB CAs will fix it.

Ability to bid for (and be awarded!) fewer reserve days and a lower guarantee, but add the ability to pick up on days off.
Ability to bid for (and be awarded) lower LPV for junior lineholders.

Put another way, if Jr NB CA can have similar time off as WB FO, the attraction goes way up. A more satisfying job, fewer time zones/backside of clock issues.

It might be frightening to implement such changes as they require additional manpower.... but mark my words: It will fix the problem. If you can choose the right balance of time and money, doing a job you enjoy, life is wonderful. But a fat paycheck for too much of a grind..... we are seeing the results of that today. Attitudes to work and life balance are shifting.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 03:25 PM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 452
Likes: 15
Default

On the surface this sounds better than what we have today. But make no mistake, not a single item in the bullet points could be considered industry leading, let alone the group of them collectively. This will not fix the staffing issues United is facing - it just won't move the QOL needle far enough.

And new hire captains? What the hell did we gain in order to concede that??
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 03:41 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
You're giving me flashbacks to the Tumi roadshow.
"We don't think that the company will do that." - BH
What a ridiculous thing to do, to not show where in the limited AIP language your belief is founded but to lean on hyperbolic non-sequiturs. Did Bill Gates put a microchip in the CA upgrade too? (You see what I did there?)
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 04:16 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by ytumama
I don’t see anyone being forced to upgrade in that AIP. Much less new hires.

The freeze will be 3 years. Deep freeze so they won't be able to move up, down, or sideways. They'll be subjected to guidelines no other UAL pilot will.
​​​​​​​This isn't spelled out in the bullet points but you can hear it for yourself if you make a call and ask.
The bullet point specifically says that any UAL pilot can bid CA as long as they meet the FAR minimums. So if these unfilled CA positions show up in a new hire class drop and these positions are the only thing left, they will be forced into these spots. Whether they want them or not. That's where the forced part comes from.

Not saying it's enough to kill a deal, but it's a bad idea. Instead of further addressing the things that make these spots go unfilled, all they'll have to do post TA is force folks into these spots. Forced into the seat and forced to be reserve for their two years in the left seat with no option to bid off.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 04:19 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 934
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
The freeze will be 3 years. Deep freeze so they won't be able to move up, down, or sideways. They'll be subjected to guidelines no other UAL pilot will.
This isn't spelled out in the bullet points but you can hear it for yourself if you make a call and ask.
The bullet point specifically says that any UAL pilot can bid CA as long as they meet the FAR minimums. So if these unfilled CA positions show up in a new hire class drop and these positions are the only thing left, they will be forced into these spots. Whether they want them or not. That's where the forced part comes from.

Not saying it's enough to kill a deal, but it's a bad idea. Instead of further addressing the things that make these spots go unfilled, all they'll have to do post TA is force folks into these spots. Forced into the seat and forced to be reserve for their two years in the left seat with no option to bid off.

yes but they still need to meet the hour requirements set forth, they don’t just go to captain school day one. I think if anything it shortens it a few months from a year where it’s currently at. It happens at delta all the time
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 04:25 PM
  #39  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by KnightNight
yes but they still need to meet the hour requirements set forth, they don’t just go to captain school day one. I think if anything it shortens it a few months from a year where it’s currently at. It happens at delta all the time
They won't go to CA school day one. I wasn't saying different. Their bid position will be CA and they will serve as FO's on that fleet for 350 hours. Aided by a consolidation line so they might get to 350 quicker than current. Once they get the 350 they'd go back to school for their bid position.
That's why I think it would go junior in a new hire class. For those that have the option in the drop with their seniority, why not just bid right seat and then go left after probation if they ultimately want the left seat? They'd avoid all of the restrictions that a new hire CA would carry for three years. I think these positions could end up going junior in a class to the folks that don't have any other categories fall to them.

Last edited by 89Pistons; 07-21-2023 at 04:42 PM.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 04:26 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KnightNight
yes but they still need to meet the hour requirements set forth, they don’t just go to captain school day one. I think if anything it shortens it a few months from a year where it’s currently at. It happens at delta all the time
Yep. And I don’t think it’ll end up getting forced. Between the reserve rule improvements possibly enticing people already on property and plenty of go-getter 30 year old RJ captains that probably wouldn’t mind immediately making 250-300k a year.

and if it does? I mean that sucks but so does getting stuck with a cross country commute to a terrible schedule in the right seat like it did for new hires ten years ago. So does getting stuck on a WB to commute to global reserve right now. I wonder if they’ll get the free year of positive space for first upgrade. That alone takes away quite a bit of the sting.

I’m not for leaving the probies for dead in contract negotiations but I’m also not particularly concerned about the slight possibility of new hires getting forced into the left seat in indoc.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thirtyonmike
Endeavor Air
38
06-25-2019 11:07 AM
DrMantisTobogan
Frontier
59
09-24-2018 06:09 AM
Excargodog
Compass Airlines
36
03-21-2018 06:30 AM
awax
United
14
02-04-2017 05:43 PM
Polarfr8dog
Cargo
6
12-06-2010 06:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices