Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Tumi 4.0? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/144397-tumi-4-0-a.html)

ytumama 09-05-2023 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by ugleeual (Post 3692594)
new hires… earliest date 8/2024. Also, some poison pills built in that requires a huge list of contract implementations to be completed before the company can use the provision.

This is the thing that gets ignored. BEFORE they release the seats to the new hires the have to offer those seats to literally everyone by releasing freezes etc. The first bid where that happens is going to be very interesting.

ugleeual 09-05-2023 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by Sunvox (Post 3692613)
Call me a cynic if you will, but this whole thread is really much to do about absolutely completely nothing. First off as the OP stated this TA will pass with flying colors so the whole opening diatribe is nothing more than wasted electrons. Second, forced upgrades have yet to actually happen and my crystal ball predicts another Black Swan event will happen taking the industry backwards a few years (perhaps even the age 67 issue) and make upgrades more of a priority. Not to mention that the industry has had periods in the past where new pilots were low time and planes didn't start crashing every week.

I get that people like to argue on the internet these days, but this thread and the arguments seem a bit overblown to me.

^^^ this… company will be coming for concessions before we see any significant (if at all) new hires flying in the left sest with 350 hours in type like the TA has written. What we need to focus on is the wording about furlough protections, displacement bids, etc… c2000 is a good example of what can/will happen… largest contract in history (except for this one) for UAL pilots and less than 2 years later we furloughed 2000+ pilots, massive displacements, seat stagnation… get the picture folks?

EWRflyr 09-05-2023 06:51 AM


Originally Posted by dailyops (Post 3692288)
I've stayed off these forums, especially since the announcement of the AIP, so I could form my own conclusions without the inevitable outrage the forums will have no matter what the deal. That being said, whatever Tumi verison we are on, this definitely seems to be one of them.

Before I start, let me preface by saying I know this TA will pass, the pilot group has waited too long and is too eager to vote in the first deal in front of them. I still firmly believe if Tumi 1.0 didn't have the massive amount of concessions and was basically a pay raise for a contract extension, it would have passed.

As for the new TA (Tumi 4.0?) I don't quite understand how we got here. We are still in the best negotiating environment this industry has seen in decades, and yet our TA is still riddled with concessions. Let's get the big one out of the way first:

1. Direct Entry Captains. United has slowly been becoming a regional mentality airline with (sometimes) higher pay rates. We've see for years how direct entry captains and the ability to displace first officers into captains have kept regional pay and QOL pathetically low until very recently. Now, we are the first major/legacy carrier to allow this. Worse yet, we were not even polled or surveyed about this huge change. It seems like this was a final item deal done at the last second to get an AIP out the door. The company can see the current TA is not good enough to get pilots to upgrade, so why can't ALPA?
...

4. LTD. We still have to pay a premium for our LTD insurance that is capped, while AA and Delta pay no premiums, and have no caps. Our retirement portion of LTD will also only be going into the market based plan, not a 401k, like AA and DAL. On top of this, our pilots currently on LTD will see no increase to their monthly benefit and will not receive a retirement contribution, again unlike AA and DAL received. I would gladly pay a little more each month to take care of the pilots on LTD, and hope to receive the same treatment if I ever needed to use this benefit.

.

As was explained on a prior thread, FOs can currently bid to the left seat as long as they have 500 hours on ANY aircraft type at United. Under the TA, they must have 350 hours in type PLUS another 100 hours of supervised OE. Completely agree that we, and other airlines, are in a whole new world regarding quick upgrades. However, one of these scenarios is much better and safer than the other (HINT: it's the one in the TA.)

In regards to the LTD, you say you don't like the fact that you still have to pay premiums as a pilot but then in the next couple of sentences you mention you will happily pay more premiums to improve payments to those currently out on LTD. You can't have it both ways. Also, we have been fighting for years to get improved LTD ($8,000 to $11,000 to the new TA numbers) to include the 16% from the company so pilots are still building for their retirement. We finally got that from the company. The new LTD section is a HUGE improvement over what we have now and, for me, more than checks off the box of improvements I wanted to see in this section.

I admit that I am a "yes" voter as well on this because every item I have on my personal list was addressed. I have yet to talk to anyone I know who is a "no" on this TA and most have different reasons other than mine.

CRJCapitan 09-05-2023 07:38 AM


Originally Posted by EWRflyr (Post 3692648)
As was explained on a prior thread, FOs can currently bid to the left seat as long as they have 500 hours on ANY aircraft type at United. Under the TA, they must have 350 hours in type PLUS another 100 hours of supervised OE. Completely agree that we, and other airlines, are in a whole new world regarding quick upgrades. However, one of these scenarios is much better and safer than the other (HINT: it's the one in the TA.)

This is so misleading. 350 hours is nothing for someone the 8-ball with 2200-2500 total time who doesn’t feel ready enough to bid for it.

hummingbear 09-05-2023 07:56 AM


Originally Posted by Sunvox (Post 3692613)
forced upgrades have yet to actually happen and my crystal ball predicts another Black Swan event will happen taking the industry backwards a few years (perhaps even the age 67 issue) and make upgrades more of a priority.

Ah, the old “these concessions are fine because the company probably won’t take advantage of them”. Thanks, guys, for playing the hits.

hummingbear 09-05-2023 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by CRJCapitan (Post 3692678)
This is so misleading. 350 hours is nothing for someone the 8-ball with 2200-2500 total time who doesn’t feel ready enough to bid for it.

Exactly, make it voluntary & it’s a whole different conversation. Mandatory is the issue. And I suppose all you guys who are preaching “the safety element is overblown” have contacted your senators & asked them to go ahead & authorize the SkyWest 135 exemption?

guppie 09-05-2023 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by dailyops (Post 3692288)
I've stayed off these forums, especially since the announcement of the AIP, so I could form my own conclusions without the inevitable outrage the forums will have no matter what the deal. That being said, whatever Tumi verison we are on, this definitely seems to be one of them.

Before I start, let me preface by saying I know this TA will pass, the pilot group has waited too long and is too eager to vote in the first deal in front of them. I still firmly believe if Tumi 1.0 didn't have the massive amount of concessions and was basically a pay raise for a contract extension, it would have passed.

As for the new TA (Tumi 4.0?) I don't quite understand how we got here. We are still in the best negotiating environment this industry has seen in decades, and yet our TA is still riddled with concessions. Let's get the big one out of the way first:

1. Direct Entry Captains. United has slowly been becoming a regional mentality airline with (sometimes) higher pay rates. We've see for years how direct entry captains and the ability to displace first officers into captains have kept regional pay and QOL pathetically low until very recently. Now, we are the first major/legacy carrier to allow this. Worse yet, we were not even polled or surveyed about this huge change. It seems like this was a final item deal done at the last second to get an AIP out the door. The company can see the current TA is not good enough to get pilots to upgrade, so why can't ALPA?

2. Reserve rules. While there was some decent movement on reserve rules, how did we get to the point to agreeing to allow the company to sit on them until August 2024? Besides computer based reserve to reserve day trades, reserve assignments are mostly manually built and assigned. There is no logical reason why it will take 10 months to implement the reserve package. As far as I can tell, this is not even a hard requirement, there is just additional add pay required after August 2024 if they are not implemented. Basically, reserves only get a 3 year deal.

3. Sick time. 1 additional hour of sick time, especially with min day increasing to 5:15, is absolutely pathetic. It is worse when you combine this with the fact we can no longer credit over 95 hours in a month with sick leave. Additionally, the company is allowed to mark an entire reserve block as sick if you use an advanced sick call.

4. LTD. We still have to pay a premium for our LTD insurance that is capped, while AA and Delta pay no premiums, and have no caps. Our retirement portion of LTD will also only be going into the market based plan, not a 401k, like AA and DAL. On top of this, our pilots currently on LTD will see no increase to their monthly benefit and will not receive a retirement contribution, again unlike AA and DAL received. I would gladly pay a little more each month to take care of the pilots on LTD, and hope to receive the same treatment if I ever needed to use this benefit.

5. Working on days off. This does not seem to have been addressed at all. No caps or limits on working on a day off for lineholders or reserves, just a bit of add pay here and there. Reserves don't even get the 50% add pay for working on days off, just 5:15 a day (which doesn't have to be implemented for 10 months).

6. The coverage pool. No firm language was made to address the issue of manipulating the coverage pool for trades and drops. There is some language saying the company will meet with ALPA to discuss/implement changes, but still give the company unilateral control to manipulate coverages.

There are also other smaller concessions that add up, such as contingent reserve assignments becoming the new airport standby, unused AV days counting towards minimum days off, and doctor's note requirements for blocking rollable days for global reserves.

I'm pretty satisfied when it comes to the payrates and retro. It's slightly above inflation, and we are still well within the top 3-5% of earners. Besides that, this TA seems pretty poor overall. We had so much leverage and absolutely gave all of it away. We were always starting negotiations a step back with the Tumi 1.0 fiasco, but after over a year of waiting and delays this TA is very disappointing.

I already know the TA will pass, but I know how I will be voting.



1. We extracted some serious value from the "forced upgrades". (think Herchel Walker trade here). New hires have always filled (been forced) into open vacancies, now our open vacancies include Captain vacancies.

2. The "forced upgrade" is also not implemented for 10 months... like the RSV changes.

3. I love our sick time. I've got a big O' balance to last me through an illness at FULL pay for a long time until LTD (a lot more than Delta's 270). And now some ESL to supplement that LTD.

4. Our LTD is tax free. Do the math.


You got the last sentence right.... It will pass. Easily.

El Guapo 09-05-2023 08:27 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3692697)
1. We extracted some serious value from the "forced upgrades". (think Herchel Walker trade here). New hires have always filled (been forced) into open vacancies, now our open vacancies include Captain vacancies.

2. The "forced upgrade" is also not implemented for 10 months... like the RSV changes.

3. I love our sick time. I've got a big O' balance to last me through an illness at FULL pay for a long time until LTD (a lot more than Delta's 270). And now some ESL to supplement that LTD.

4. Our LTD is tax free. Do the math.


You got the last sentence right.... It will pass. Easily.

You are happy with the fact that you are paying thousands of dollars a year for a LTD program that’s capped??? While our peers don’t pay a cent and there’s no cap? Talk about a cheap date.

guppie 09-05-2023 09:02 AM


Originally Posted by El Guapo (Post 3692703)
You are happy with the fact that you are paying thousands of dollars a year for a LTD program that’s capped??? While our peers don’t pay a cent and there’s no cap? Talk about a cheap date.

yes. very happy. Capped at what? $13500 DOS and increasing to $15900 monthly. Don't forget that's TAX FREE. Do the math on 50% pay at Delta and American with taxes hauled out.
Yes, we pay... a very modest cost, and getting cheaper with the 28% reduction.

ugleeual 09-05-2023 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3692719)
yes. very happy. Capped at what? $13500 DOS and increasing to $15900 monthly. Don't forget that's TAX FREE. Do the math on 50% pay at Delta and American with taxes hauled out.
Yes, we pay... a very modest cost, and getting cheaper with the 28% reduction.

with B/C fund contributions and auto annual increases our LTD is a better IMO… it sucked at $8K, got better with the last Covid TA (11.5), and now is an amount that won’t drain their savings to maintain same QoL.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:40 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands