Is United looking at the 220?
01-29-2024, 06:34 PM
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,911
Originally Posted by iahflyr
We need to do something to make up my or all that lost profit sharing by pushing away all these customers and their money
01-29-2024, 06:52 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,178
Originally Posted by iahflyr
We need to do something to make up my or all that lost profit sharing by pushing away all these customers and their money
01-30-2024, 10:43 AM
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 646
Originally Posted by iahflyr
Our first TA increased that weight limit by 4,000lbs. That would have allowed the 50 seat CRJ-550 to be used as designed and not handicapped with an artificial limit that prevents it from being used on many routes.
However, too many people were irrational and got caught up in “they took ‘er jobs” panic mode. Then we had to use up negotiating capital to renegotiate that demand and give up some other improvement we could have gotten in the contract.
However, too many people were irrational and got caught up in “they took ‘er jobs” panic mode. Then we had to use up negotiating capital to renegotiate that demand and give up some other improvement we could have gotten in the contract.
options for regional flying.
Doing ORD-AUS like the Crj-200 did is not what a 50 seat rj was intended for.
and what Negotiating capital? It's the status quo, so nothing was expended.
01-30-2024, 10:50 AM
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 156
Originally Posted by C11DCA
and what Negotiating capital? It's the status quo, so nothing was expended.
01-30-2024, 11:53 AM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,072
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
The updated FAA pax weight changed the situation. Nothing wrong with "not one seat, not one pound" but they could have allowed some weight change, gotten something in return and kept the planes range at original specs with previous FAA policy.
where does it end? Maybe some more 76 seaters in exchange for better crew meals?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
