Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2014, 11:27 AM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Back to da “Bus soon, thank GOD!
Posts: 650
Default United Excuses

Excuses Galore at United Airlines

By Adam Levine-Weinberg | More Articles
March 3, 2014 | Comments (1)
On Thursday, United Continental (NYSE: UAL ) updated its Q1 investor guidance to reflect that unit revenue will be down 0.5%-2.5% this quarter. This compares to an initial expectation of a 0%-2% gain. United blamed the revenue weakness on the severe weather that has snarled U.S. air travel this year.
Most airline analysts have advised investors to look past United's weak Q1, arguing that the bad weather should be seen as a one-time occurrence with no long-term implications. Normally, I'd be inclined to agree -- investors should not be fazed by short-term setbacks for companies with good long-term prospects.

United Continental is on pace for an ugly loss in Q1.
However, this is just the latest in a long line of excuses that United's management team has used to explain away weak results. As has often been the case, United's excuses don't quite hold up to scrutiny. United's weak Q1 performance is merely one symptom of a much bigger problem: bad management.
The big excuse(s)
In an SEC filing on Thursday, United stated that it had been forced to cancel more than 22,500 flights year to date due to severe weather. This is nearly four times the number of cancellations during the same period in 2013!
The vast majority of the cancellations -- about 20,000 -- affected regional flights. Regional flights tend to be shorter than mainline flights and have fewer seats, and so unit revenue for these flights is almost double the unit revenue for mainline flights on average. Canceling lots of high-unit revenue regional flights therefore negatively affected United's overall unit revenue.

United canceled about 20,000 regional flights in the first two months of 2014.
United estimated that weather-related cancellations negatively affected Q1 unit revenue by 1.5 percentage points in total. The company saw an additional 0.5 percentage point headwind from re-estimating the number of future tickets that would go unused. Lastly, United stated that the shift in Easter demand from March to April has been greater than expected.
It doesn't add up
While United has provided a lot of explanations (or excuses) for its weak performance, there is more to the story than meets the eye. First, United's initial estimate for a 0%-2% increase in Q1 unit revenue already put it well behind top competitors Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL ) and American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL ) .
Delta's original Q1 unit revenue projection called for a 2%-4% increase. For January, Delta reported a 5% unit revenue gain, which was better than its initial expectation. Moreover, while Delta also experienced heavy flight cancellations, these actually had a slight positive impact on its unit revenue! Meanwhile, as of three weeks ago, American was sticking with its initial guidance for a 2%-4% Q1 unit revenue gain.

Winter storms haven't kept Delta or American down!
Given the large scale of the three network carriers, there's no reason why the bad weather should have disproportionately affected United's unit revenue. Atlanta and Dallas (the largest hubs for Delta and American, respectively) have been hit by big ice storms this year, causing lots of flight cancellations. United seems to have had much more trouble than its rivals in recapturing revenue from canceled flights.
Furthermore, many of the headwinds that United cited when reducing its guidance should have been incorporated in its original guidance. Of United's 22,500 canceled flights year to date, more than 12,000 occurred between Jan.1 and Jan. 22, according to data from masFlight -- before United issued the guidance it just retracted!
Indeed, United CFO John Rainey told analysts on the company's January earnings call that the guidance for 0%-2% unit revenue growth was conservative. He specifically called out January flight cancellations and the Easter shift as factors driving lower unit revenue growth. It seems disingenuous for United to come back a month later and blame the same things for falling short of the already weak guidance.
A pattern of underperformance
From an investor perspective, the worst thing about United's latest issue is that it fits neatly into a pattern of consistent underperformance. Over the past three years, Delta has grown its pre-tax earnings rapidly. Meanwhile, United earned less money in 2013 than it did in 2011. (American also has vastly improved its profitability since 2011, but it had an "assist" from bankruptcy-related cost cuts.)

DAL Pre-Tax Income (TTM) data by YCharts
So far, it looks like Delta is well on the way to extending its pre-tax profit advantage over United in 2014. While United should still be able to improve its full-year 2014 profitability compared to 2013, the average analyst EPS estimate of $4.33 probably overestimates United's earnings power. Based on United's track record, investors should expect more excuses in the coming quarters to explain why United can't match its competitors' earnings.
Foolish bottom line
Sometimes, one-time issues cause a solid company's stock to go on sale, making for a great buying opportunity. Some analysts are interpreting United's recent guidance revision in that way.
However, sometimes a bad quarter is part of a broader pattern of weak performance. As of six months ago, United was mired in a streak of nine consecutive quarters of year-over-year earnings declines -- at a time when the rest of the airline industry was posting solid earnings growth! In fact, last quarter was arguably the company's only really strong quarter since the 2010 United-Continental merger.
Looking at the last several years as a whole, United's strong Q4 performance stands out as the anomaly compared to the numerous quarters when, for one reason or another, United has missed the mark. Investors should probably avoid United Continental until it starts delivering solid results on a more consistent basis.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 11:45 AM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

This guy hates us. No matter what he always finds the bad news.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 11:47 AM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
Investors should probably avoid United Continental until it starts delivering solid results on a more consistent basis.
By the time that happens, the stock will be WAY too expensive, and he will rant that United is overbought.

Using the perfect market theory, our stock price is exactly correct because it already takes in all this information.

So which stock would you rather own, one that is overperforming, or one that is underperforming and could do much better with more potential?
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 07:41 PM   #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 1,890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
This guy hates us. No matter what he always finds the bad news.
But is he wrong? I think not.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 07:55 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 2,936
Default

Don't like the message....?
oldmako is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 08:05 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
8ballfreight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Posts: 196
Default

The author has a short position on ual stock right now.
Also, he loves rjet stock, so that is about enough to write a guy off from the word go.
8ballfreight is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 11:06 PM   #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CRM114's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8ballfreight View Post
The author has a short position on ual stock right now.
Also, he loves rjet stock, so that is about enough to write a guy off from the word go.
So, did UAL Corp revise it's Q1 earning estimates downward from an already industry trailing position?
CRM114 is offline  
Old 03-04-2014, 05:17 AM   #8  
Don't say Guppy
 
Probe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Somebody has to be the bottom. Welcome to UAL!
Probe is offline  
Old 08-09-2014, 03:57 PM   #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Probe View Post
Somebody has to be the bottom. Welcome to UAL!
And somebody at the top.

"Delta Has Totally Stopped Canceling Flights"

For airline geeks, the Department of Transportation’s monthly consumer travel report is a data trove (PDF) that can expose trouble spots in carriers’ operations. It’s also a way for airlines to keep score: Many of them pay out employee bonuses for good performance. Two things stick out from the newly released report on June:

Delta just doesn’t cancel. For all practical purposes, the nation’s third-largest airline no longer cancels flights. Delta (DAL) scrubbed 19 flights in June—that’s out of 69,621 flights in total. Delta executives have become fanatical about eradicating flight cancellations, having found that passengers prefer flight delays to outright cancellations. “If that’s what customers hate most, let’s not cancel any more flights,” a Delta vice president told the Wall Street Journal earlier this year.

http://www.businessweek.com/articles...till-runs-late
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-09-2014, 08:52 PM   #10  
Don't say Guppy
 
Probe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

I have been reading about DAL's efforts in this for a couple of months. Very interesting. They are going back to MORE spare aircraft and commercialing their crews out to pick up an aircraft and passengers when they think the scheduled crew is going illegal. They have even launched trans atlantic and planned to stop short of destination as the crew could not make it with 117. Backup crew flew commercial in and picked the aircraft up and flew it out an hour later.

Really thinking outside the box, and their operational metrics are blowing everybody else out of the water by 10 points.
Probe is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
United Drops Air Wisconsin (2005) Gordon C Air Wisconsin 10 06-11-2020 03:16 PM
United: Growth plans on little expenditure EWRflyr United 44 04-26-2014 05:07 AM
United Announces New International And Domest Rotor2prop Major 13 07-11-2012 10:55 AM
United Gets $1.2 Billion Dollar Cash Infusion iahflyr Major 13 07-30-2008 10:20 PM
United Airlines Announces Major Aircraft Order WatchThis! Major 8 04-01-2006 08:57 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 AM.