United Excuses
#11
I have been reading about DAL's efforts in this for a couple of months. Very interesting. They are going back to MORE spare aircraft and commercialing their crews out to pick up an aircraft and passengers when they think the scheduled crew is going illegal. They have even launched trans atlantic and planned to stop short of destination as the crew could not make it with 117. Backup crew flew commercial in and picked the aircraft up and flew it out an hour later.
* stockholder
#12
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
I would never propose such a silly thing. Just passing on what I read about Delta.
Since DAL's unit costs are lower than ours, seems we have a cost problem somewhere. My guess is most of it is pi$$ed away in a big tall building in downtown Chicago.
Since DAL's unit costs are lower than ours, seems we have a cost problem somewhere. My guess is most of it is pi$$ed away in a big tall building in downtown Chicago.
#13
Banned
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
When was the last time United or one of it's pre-merger predecessors had a 100% completion factor day ( no cancellations)?
Hint, it was before a couple certain executives in charge of tech ops and route planning left and went to Delta.
As Delta and Alaska are showing the industry, it is not a matter of being the "biggest". Meeting the core expectations of customers is what counts first. Once that becomes the norm, growth can occur -slowly.
Hint, it was before a couple certain executives in charge of tech ops and route planning left and went to Delta.
As Delta and Alaska are showing the industry, it is not a matter of being the "biggest". Meeting the core expectations of customers is what counts first. Once that becomes the norm, growth can occur -slowly.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Its not as simple as looking at hourly pay rates between employee groups, etc.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 235
Unit costs are misleading. We are in the midst of a higher depreciation schedule under MACRS than Delta is because of where we are in the aircraft delivery schedule. DALs costs are going to rise as their deliveries come in because of the accelerated depreciation on those aircraft.
Its not as simple as looking at hourly pay rates between employee groups, etc.
Its not as simple as looking at hourly pay rates between employee groups, etc.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 880
Unit costs are misleading. We are in the midst of a higher depreciation schedule under MACRS than Delta is because of where we are in the aircraft delivery schedule. DALs costs are going to rise as their deliveries come in because of the accelerated depreciation on those aircraft.
Its not as simple as looking at hourly pay rates between employee groups, etc.
Its not as simple as looking at hourly pay rates between employee groups, etc.
#17
I am trying to fly only on DAL/Skyteam, for 3 reasons, and 2 of them are because of DAL mgmt decisions:
1-DAL has the most larger aircraft:
I flew Columbus to MIA on an Eagle 50 seater.
I flew ORD-MIA on a United Express Mesa 50 seater.
I looked at LAX-GRB:
AA and UAL both had 50 seaters from LAX-ORD-GRB.
DAL had an A-320 from LAX-MSP, then a Compass ERJ-175 from MSP-GRB. I booked the DAL itinerary.
2-DAL has a lot less cancellations than UAL/AA, and they don't fly through ORD, which is over-capacity during rush hour, so the slightest WX problems cause delays, which AA and UAL both blame on ATC!!!
About the only reason I am not flying DAL more, is that sometimes DAL/Skyteam doesn't go where I need to fly, or sometimes DAL has no seats. Occasionally AA/UAL has better schedules, but not often.
If it is not DAL, then I try to fly AA, and that is for two reasons:
1-AA has Qatar in it's network, so when I am flying thru or to/from the Middle East, I can get airline miles on AA (can't with Emirates, Etihad or DAL/UAL).
2-AA seems to have a better network, and less cancelled flights than UAL.
Overall, for American carriers, I really prefer DAL.
My buddy flies feed for both UAL and DAL. He said it is Night and Day when comparing the support he gets for his flights. The DAL personnel are MUCH more helpful, and the DAL operation runs much more smoothly. He said it is really obvious that DAL is doing a much better job than UAL.
My last point: I hope that DAL/AA/UAL can compete effectively vs. EK/EY/Qatar (and Turkish). They are really starting to move a lot of passengers (including me) to and from the US, from all points of the globe, and with a MUCH higher level or service, food, and passenger amenities.
1-DAL has the most larger aircraft:
I flew Columbus to MIA on an Eagle 50 seater.
I flew ORD-MIA on a United Express Mesa 50 seater.
I looked at LAX-GRB:
AA and UAL both had 50 seaters from LAX-ORD-GRB.
DAL had an A-320 from LAX-MSP, then a Compass ERJ-175 from MSP-GRB. I booked the DAL itinerary.
2-DAL has a lot less cancellations than UAL/AA, and they don't fly through ORD, which is over-capacity during rush hour, so the slightest WX problems cause delays, which AA and UAL both blame on ATC!!!
About the only reason I am not flying DAL more, is that sometimes DAL/Skyteam doesn't go where I need to fly, or sometimes DAL has no seats. Occasionally AA/UAL has better schedules, but not often.
If it is not DAL, then I try to fly AA, and that is for two reasons:
1-AA has Qatar in it's network, so when I am flying thru or to/from the Middle East, I can get airline miles on AA (can't with Emirates, Etihad or DAL/UAL).
2-AA seems to have a better network, and less cancelled flights than UAL.
Overall, for American carriers, I really prefer DAL.
My buddy flies feed for both UAL and DAL. He said it is Night and Day when comparing the support he gets for his flights. The DAL personnel are MUCH more helpful, and the DAL operation runs much more smoothly. He said it is really obvious that DAL is doing a much better job than UAL.
My last point: I hope that DAL/AA/UAL can compete effectively vs. EK/EY/Qatar (and Turkish). They are really starting to move a lot of passengers (including me) to and from the US, from all points of the globe, and with a MUCH higher level or service, food, and passenger amenities.
#18
When was the last time United or one of it's pre-merger predecessors had a 100% completion factor day ( no cancellations)?
Hint, it was before a couple certain executives in charge of tech ops and route planning left and went to Delta.
As Delta and Alaska are showing the industry, it is not a matter of being the "biggest". Meeting the core expectations of customers is what counts first. Once that becomes the norm, growth can occur -slowly.
Hint, it was before a couple certain executives in charge of tech ops and route planning left and went to Delta.
As Delta and Alaska are showing the industry, it is not a matter of being the "biggest". Meeting the core expectations of customers is what counts first. Once that becomes the norm, growth can occur -slowly.
The trend is "technically" reversible but you can't get there from here. Changes must be made and yesterday. The right people in the right positions and a heavy dose of REAL leadership from the heart is required. Is that realistically possible? I don't know but structural / managerial changes have to lead the rally for it to sustain and have any credibility for leadership to be effective.
UAL + "2012 Same old - Same old song and dance" = The new TWA.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
And I don't care how much DAL said they made because they aren't taking 787s and 35 guppies this year, when 1st year capital depreciation is at its highest.
Why does no one compare us to Southwest, the largest US domestic airline, where we almost doubled their 2nd quarter profit of $475M.
United could certainly perform a lot better, but in our 75+ year history we just set an all-time financial performance record.
I'm not thrilled with the performance, but we are doing damn good IMO.
Let's keep things in perspective, please.
#20
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
We just made $900M in the 2nd quarter and going to make over $1B in the 3rd quarter. Both will be quarterly records. That's "data".
And I don't care how much DAL said they made because they aren't taking 787s and 35 guppies this year, when 1st year capital depreciation is at its highest.
Why does no one compare us to Southwest, the largest US domestic airline, where we almost doubled their 2nd quarter profit of $475M.
United could certainly perform a lot better, but in our 75+ year history we just set an all-time financial performance record.
I'm not thrilled with the performance, but we are doing damn good IMO.
Let's keep things in perspective, please.
And I don't care how much DAL said they made because they aren't taking 787s and 35 guppies this year, when 1st year capital depreciation is at its highest.
Why does no one compare us to Southwest, the largest US domestic airline, where we almost doubled their 2nd quarter profit of $475M.
United could certainly perform a lot better, but in our 75+ year history we just set an all-time financial performance record.
I'm not thrilled with the performance, but we are doing damn good IMO.
Let's keep things in perspective, please.
Our current predicament isn't as bad in some ways, but the reason we just reported high earnings is just the revenue environment. "A rising tide raises all boats".
A lot is being made of how many aircraft we are taking delivery of. Guess what, it is just the normal rate of aircraft replacement, assuming a 25 year life for an airframe. We are taking delivery of about 4 - 5% of our fleet in new aircraft per year. Our fleet is not "new" it is just not as old as DAL's.
Less than 10% of our fleet is in the first 2 years of their lives. The high depreciation rate that you speak of affects only a very small fraction of our overall fleet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post