![]() |
Originally Posted by tupues
(Post 3909321)
No, not at all. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing anything and the guy along with his GF was indeed the VP jumpseat at United. Anyway. Have a good weekend!
Stay mad. |
Originally Posted by tupues
(Post 3909321)
No, not at all. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing anything and the guy along with his GF was indeed the VP jumpseat at United. Anyway. Have a good weekend!
He did the math, saw that he was a lock for a seat in the cabin, and turned down the JS so you can have it. Like a good ALPA member does for a fellow pilot. You don't have to thank the guy if you don't want, but at least don't disparage someone for trying to hook you up. |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3909296)
Personally, I hope he wouldn’t have given up the jumpseat in order to bump a United pass rider from a cabin seat. That’s the only scenario where the dude would have gotten left behind.
|
Originally Posted by ClappedOut145
(Post 3909365)
Oh I would…if it comes down to a pass rider getting a seat or the other jumpseat getting on, I’m taking the seat in the cabin and helping that pilot get to their destination. Take care of your fellow pilots first and make sure that you get to where you need to and they get to where they need to regardless of what ID they wear. If there aren’t any pilots listed and I can get a pass rider on by taking the jumpseat I will, but if me taking a seat in the back means getting a lower priority code pilot on the jumpseat then I’m taking the seat in the back.
|
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this entirely. The way I’m used to you have a listing for any seat on the plane, all by seniority order. As a last resort, if the cabin is full, the jumpseat(s) get assigned, again in order of seniority (to people eligible for it). I’ve never heard of people being allowed to double list out of order etc. (and the carriers I’ve worked at are ALPA too) where I am from that’s frowned upon because you block several seats without ever actually using them.
If that’s possible at UA I can get his patronizing stance. He knew he was gonna get a seat in the back and was now offering his Jumpseat to me (even though it’s not even him deciding who gets it ultimately). Yes people can argue that he was doing me a solid, however imho it’s not the way it’s supposed to be. If you get a seat in the cabin you should take it and not mess up the system by listing for the JS only to give it to someone else at the last minute to stand there as a star. |
Originally Posted by OldAndGrumpy
(Post 3909347)
Wow, clearly you’re mad the young mustache guy is at mainline and you’re not.
Stay mad. the only thing missing was him videoing himself 😂 |
Originally Posted by tupues
(Post 3909372)
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this entirely. The way I’m used to you have a listing for any seat on the plane, all by seniority order. As a last resort, if the cabin is full, the jumpseat(s) get assigned, again in order of seniority (to people eligible for it). I’ve never heard of people being allowed to double list out of order etc. (and the carriers I’ve worked at are ALPA too) where I am from that’s frowned upon because you block several seats without ever actually using them.
If that’s possible at UA I can get his patronizing stance. He knew he was gonna get a seat in the back and was now offering his Jumpseat to me (even though it’s not even him deciding who gets it ultimately). Yes people can argue that he was doing me a solid, however imho it’s not the way it’s supposed to be. If you get a seat in the cabin you should take it and not mess up the system by listing for the JS only to give it to someone else at the last minute to stand there as a star. There is no “supposed to be.” Every airline is different. At United, we can and are encouraged to list for both the cabin and the JS, allowing the most junior/lowest priority pilot to occupy the jumpseat if available. Some recent changes to our IT may make this practice less important, though, but that won’t affect you. |
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 3909375)
There is no “supposed to be.” Every airline is different. At United, we can and are encouraged to list for both the cabin and the JS, allowing the most junior/lowest priority pilot to occupy the jumpseat if available. Some recent changes to our IT may make this practice less important, though, but that won’t affect you.
|
Originally Posted by tupues
(Post 3909372)
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this entirely. The way I’m used to you have a listing for any seat on the plane, all by seniority order. As a last resort, if the cabin is full, the jumpseat(s) get assigned, again in order of seniority (to people eligible for it). I’ve never heard of people being allowed to double list out of order etc. (and the carriers I’ve worked at are ALPA too) where I am from that’s frowned upon because you block several seats without ever actually using them.
If that’s possible at UA I can get his patronizing stance. He knew he was gonna get a seat in the back and was now offering his Jumpseat to me (even though it’s not even him deciding who gets it ultimately). Yes people can argue that he was doing me a solid, however imho it’s not the way it’s supposed to be. If you get a seat in the cabin you should take it and not mess up the system by listing for the JS only to give it to someone else at the last minute to stand there as a star. |
Originally Posted by tupues
(Post 3909377)
Oh I see. So should I be doing the same when I list in the future? Or is this automatic? Do I need to tell them at the podium that I want to be listed for both? I always assumed a listing for the JS meant an automatic flowback if there is space in the back.
I think the other pilot was simply telling you he got a seat in the back from his cabin listing and the system worked as it should. Like most carriers, we can see everyone on and offline listed for the pilot and FA jump seats as well as everyone in the cabin. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands