![]() |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3977460)
Here's a wrong upgrade predictions.
So 5-10 years would be 2015 to 2020 hires...so he's predicting no post-covid hires upgrading to Captain. When in fact over half on the last bid were. A lot more bad takes in other threads. This was the first I found. Our late 2022 hires upgraded on the last bid and this one. By the time they hit the line, it'll be 3.5 years since hire. For someone hired in Jan 2026, it's very reasonable to expect that they will be able to upgrade, at best, in 5 years. Because the contract is so much better for reserve guys, and because new CAs now get a year of positive space commuting, the two biggest obstacles to upgrade have been significantly improved. Which is why we're seeing so many more people wanting to jump the trash bag. Obviously nobody has a crystal ball, but I can't imagine a scenario in which 2026 hires upgrade in the 3.5 years it's taking the late 2022 hires. So I agree fully with VacancyBid's projections. |
Originally Posted by Turbosina
(Post 3977503)
That's not at all how I read his post. He specifically stated that over the near to medium term future, that upgrades would settle at 5-10 years. I read that as "for people hired now." And I think that's a very reasonable assumption because it would return upgrade times to where they have historically been, on average.
Our late 2022 hires upgraded on the last bid and this one. By the time they hit the line, it'll be 3.5 years since hire. For someone hired in Jan 2026, it's very reasonable to expect that they will be able to upgrade, at best, in 5 years. Because the contract is so much better for reserve guys, and because new CAs now get a year of positive space commuting, the two biggest obstacles to upgrade have been significantly improved. Which is why we're seeing so many more people wanting to jump the trash bag. Obviously nobody has a crystal ball, but I can't imagine a scenario in which 2026 hires upgrade in the 3.5 years it's taking the late 2022 hires. So I agree fully with VacancyBid's projections. I grew up in the south knowing delta guys on furlough throughout my young adult years. I think anyone losing sleep over having a 4-5 year flow to the left seat probably needs to stay in the right seat and gain perspective anyways. That's my $0.02. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3977465)
Read the part you didn't bold about when that pattern would emerge
He was guessing 5-10 years, and he was wrong. |
Originally Posted by aerow88
(Post 3977532)
I think his projections are spot on. As a 24 hire, I'm guesstimating I'll be able to hold the left seat plug 73 spot in ORD around spring of '28, and the last 2 vacancy bids would indicate thats a reasonable timeline.
I grew up in the south knowing delta guys on furlough throughout my young adult years. I think anyone losing sleep over having a 4-5 year flow to the left seat probably needs to stay in the right seat and gain perspective anyways. That's my $0.02. Given that ORD is a more senior base then SFO/LAX, and those bases were in the 13k range for 737CA in the last award, it seems like it may be a longer wait then two more years. |
The company learned its lesson after it went bananas with the new hire and probationary awards to CA only for deliveries to grind to a halt. Now they are taking a cautious approach. I think with retirements and deliveries now, these two vacancies will be wholly inadequate in 6 months time. The problem with ORD is it’s shifting to 320 flying, so the 737 may stagnate for a bit. My best guess
|
Originally Posted by TimetoClimb
(Post 3977551)
The company learned its lesson after it went bananas with the new hire and probationary awards to CA only for deliveries to grind to a halt. Now they are taking a cautious approach. I think with retirements and deliveries now, these two vacancies will be wholly inadequate in 6 months time. The problem with ORD is it’s shifting to 320 flying, so the 737 may stagnate for a bit. My best guess
|
Originally Posted by JackReacher
(Post 3977357)
Dude, you know pilots would complain that the bag of $100s is too heavy!! And 3 legs are too many?!? I routinely did 6 to 8 legs a day at the regionals 20 years ago for a hell of a lot less money. Perspective people!! Perspective.
Originally Posted by Guppydriver95
(Post 3977428)
20 years ago is the key phrase here. Those 6-8 leg days are a young person’s game. What I could do then and can do now without complete exhaustion are 2 different animals.
I really do buy into the LeBron James load shedding or load management phenomenon practiced in the NBA with our profession. |
Originally Posted by Dynamiterabbit
(Post 3977543)
What indicates that you could hold ORD737CA in 2028?.
|
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3977105)
Layovers are good, it’s the number of legs…
You must of never flown 10 legs a day in a B1900. 3 legs a day isn’t tough. |
Originally Posted by flynd94
(Post 3977627)
You must of never flown 10 legs a day in a B1900. 3 legs a day isn’t tough.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands