Search

Notices

FA Contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2026 | 12:19 PM
  #81  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Freds Ex
which is not good.

Despite whatever dysfunction the AFA may seem to have, it does not benefit any UAL pilot to publicly take the company's side or deem FA contract desires as unreasonable.
This right here….
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 12:21 PM
  #82  
Swakid8's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Navy
10 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by AF OneWire
I don’t see how this doesn’t end up in arbitration, based on how far apart the side are.

I’d be curious to know how many majors have FAs using PBS vs line bidding. If 75% have already gone to PBS it might be in their best interests to focus their negotiating capital elsewhere (work rules). That way if it gets to arbitration you can say “look how unreasonable the company is, no one else does X,Y, and Z but the company is insisting on it.”
Mediation is word you are looking for not Arbitration….
Reply
Old 01-14-2026 | 07:01 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 279
Likes: 181
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
SWA attendants do not use PBS. Their new contract includes maternal/paternal leave, 22% initial raise w/retro, 3% increase per year.
And no required hours for medical insurance.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 03:25 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Swakid8
Mediation is word you are looking for not Arbitration….
They have been in mediation for a long time.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 06:12 AM
  #85  
SoFloFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 161
Default

Originally Posted by Freds Ex
And no required hours for medical insurance.
I don’t get this. Idk of any job that pays for benefits for someone who doesn’t work. What am I missing?
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 09:38 AM
  #86  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 33
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by SoFloFlyer
I don’t get this. Idk of any job that pays for benefits for someone who doesn’t work. What am I missing?
AND five weeks of paid vacation a year despite not stepping foot onboard an aircraft for years.

Yeah... some of us that work there actually don't get it either.

It's incredible how often you hear someone here mention another flight attendant who works here "but they haven't flown in a long time."
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 02:27 PM
  #87  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 308
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

My spouse is a 26 year FA at WN. She says the same thing. She was a 200TFP/month flyer for a long time. She says the same thing—many senior to her just do recurrent and give everything away. The FA gig (especially for the senior ones) at SWA seems to be the best pay and QOL in the industry.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 05:31 PM
  #88  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 444
Likes: 88
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
My spouse is a 26 year FA at WN. She says the same thing. She was a 200TFP/month flyer for a long time. She says the same thing—many senior to her just do recurrent and give everything away. The FA gig (especially for the senior ones) at SWA seems to be the best pay and QOL in the industry.
I understand why they do it, free medical care for them and the family, travel benefits, vacation pay….but every one of those folks is probably costing the company over 100k per person per year.

It seems like the first thing a labor board member, or member of congress forcing a contract would throw out. It’s not a hill I would choose to die on, but maybe they are just trying to get the company to give them something juicy in return.

The safety aspect of very aged FA is a little concerning though. Probably a topic for a different thread though.
Reply
Old 01-15-2026 | 06:19 PM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 249
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by AF OneWire
I understand why they do it, free medical care for them and the family, travel benefits, vacation pay….but every one of those folks is probably costing the company over 100k per person per year.

It seems like the first thing a labor board member, or member of congress forcing a contract would throw out. It’s not a hill I would choose to die on, but maybe they are just trying to get the company to give them something juicy in return.

The safety aspect of very aged FA is a little concerning though. Probably a topic for a different thread though.
100k for someone who doesn’t work ?? Well that’s money that come from the total bottom line affecting profits and………….profit sharing.
Just food for thought.
Reply
Old 01-16-2026 | 03:58 AM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 444
Likes: 88
Default

Originally Posted by OFFCOURSE
100k for someone who doesn’t work ?? Well that’s money that come from the total bottom line affecting profits and………….profit sharing.
Just food for thought.
I don’t mind the company making less profit to pay employees, but only if those employees ……actually …,you know…. work

I’d much rather have that contract value going to new hires doing the hard work dealing with customers every day.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
4
09-04-2008 12:09 PM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM
old gasser
Union Talk
28
06-08-2008 12:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices