IAH Widebody plans
#31
IAH has a robust INTL portfolio but it’s because those people are going to IAH. No one is going to go out of their way to go to IAH on United to fly somewhere. United’s network doesn’t require that….Continentals did.
#32
It was all EWR and IAH for Continental, that’s it….
Post-merger, it would been naive think United would continue to maintain Continental level of international flying through IAH abd prioritize connecting traffic for trans-pacific flights over SFO, LAX, and even ORD…
ANZ, ZIPAir, ANA, ITA all rely on Point of Sale from their hubs…
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets;[url=tel:4013372
4013372]I don’t disagree with you but INTL flying requires connections unless the flight can stand on its own.
who will connect through IAH to get anywhere in the world outside of central and South America…..SYD works because it picks up connections from east of the Mississippi and it’s on the way. You could make a case for South Africa but at the moment we don’t have the slots and the distance is just a bit to far for any aircraft to fly it profitably.
who will connect through IAH to get anywhere in the world outside of central and South America…..SYD works because it picks up connections from east of the Mississippi and it’s on the way. You could make a case for South Africa but at the moment we don’t have the slots and the distance is just a bit to far for any aircraft to fly it profitably.
IAH is geographically limited in the companies ability to funnel network traffic through for international connections. From just about anywhere in the Midwest and southern states there is a better hub, going in the correct direction to most intl destinations. Unless that destination is South America, which just flat out does not have the travel density to support large scale widebody flying on a EWR/SFO scale. The entire continent has less than 6% of the global population. It’s just the reality of the geography. Clearly the bean counters know exactly how much O&D traffic there is and have deemed it more profitable to route it through a coastal hub.
Originally Posted by jdavk;[url=tel:4013863
4013863]Yeah, I guess that explains why Air New Zealand, ZipAir, ANA and ITA have moved in since the merger, eh?
From a numbers and geography standpoint, IAH will never win for intl travel it just will not. It will serve its purpose in the domestic market and the limited intl fly it does service, but it’s a cog in the machine of making money serving its purpose.
John Paxson may not have been the superstar MJ and Scotty Pippin were, but he was still an important part of the team and they wouldn’t have won as many championships as they did without him.
Otherwise, you’re free to bid/move some where the flying is more to your liking.
Last edited by Grumble; 03-18-2026 at 10:14 PM.
#34
line slug
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
Yeah, all of the ex-CAL guys have heard these excuses for years (applied to all of the hubs as CEOs came and went) from actual airline managers, not the wannabe pilot “experts” around here, a lot of whom don’t even fly airplanes, from the look of it.
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Last edited by jdavk; 03-19-2026 at 01:46 PM.
#35
Yeah, all of the ex-CAL guys have heard these excuses for years (applied to all of the hubs as CEOs came and went) from actual airline managers, not the wannabe pilot “experts” around here, a lot of whom don’t even fly airplanes, from the look of it.
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
#36
line slug
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 360
Likes: 7
From: B787 Captain
#38
Yeah, all of the ex-CAL guys have heard these excuses for years (applied to all of the hubs as CEOs came and went) from actual airline managers, not the wannabe pilot “experts” around here, a lot of whom don’t even fly airplanes, from the look of it.
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
IAH thrived in those circumstances because DEN losing money hand over fist and the costs of moving over to DIA was too much for Continental to swallow coming out of Bankruptcy 2.0….
LAX hasn’t been a hub for Continental since the Robert F Six days…. Pretty sure none of us were in the industry during those days…..
After the DEN hub closure, It was all IAH, EWR for international or nothing. It’s easy to run more international flights if you have 2 hubs to feed passengers through….
#39
make it from IAH Europe. If the XLR makes it to IAH it will be for smaller markets in SOUTH AMERICA. Because that’s what IAH is good for
#40
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 599
Likes: 46
Yeah, all of the ex-CAL guys have heard these excuses for years (applied to all of the hubs as CEOs came and went) from actual airline managers, not the wannabe pilot “experts” around here, a lot of whom don’t even fly airplanes, from the look of it.
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Yet when CAL had DEN and LAX bases IAH still thrived as an international airport, even when oil was the only economic driver in town. Oh well, Mama U has other plans and Kirby has done a good job running the place so it is what it is.
Anyway, I’m glad to have access to all of the management expertise here capable of explaining away the loss of market share!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




