Search

Notices

Aircraft types

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2010 | 07:36 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Default Aircraft types

Does UAL have a replacement plan for the 744? Is it a type of the 787, maybe the 773 or nothing at all? Any talk of reducing the number of different fleet types that the combined UAL/CAL will operate?
Reply
Old 07-18-2010 | 08:28 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: B777 FO
Default

I believe they ordered the A350 as a 747 replacement and they start arriving in 2016 barring any negotiation with Boeing on there own 747 replacement.
Reply
Old 07-18-2010 | 08:43 PM
  #3  
LifeNtheFstLne's Avatar
Recommend Retention
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Bigfoot
Default

The new United will eventually be all Boeing, as it should be. That Airbus order is a joke. Time will tell...
Reply
Old 07-18-2010 | 08:48 PM
  #4  
Monkeyfly's Avatar
Widebody
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: 777 CAP
Default

United had a $90 million dollar penalty due for non-delivery of A320s.(Fact)

So, they negotiated out of it by placing an order for A350s. (Guess)
Reply
Old 07-21-2010 | 05:55 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 65
Default

How about some heavy lift like the 748. I'm tired of other people carrying cargo out of IAH.
Reply
Old 07-24-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #6  
Tony Nelson's Avatar
Fore!
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: 756 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
How about some heavy lift like the 748. I'm tired of other people carrying cargo out of IAH.
Remember, there is no money in cargo.
Reply
Old 07-24-2010 | 06:31 AM
  #7  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
The new United will eventually be all Boeing, as it should be. That Airbus order is a joke. Time will tell...
I hope you're right. But I don't think so.
Reply
Old 10-18-2014 | 09:35 PM
  #8  
CRM114's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
The new United will eventually be all Boeing, as it should be. That Airbus order is a joke. Time will tell...
Considering the McQuality that Boeing is turning these days, I'm not sure it matters.

To the OP:

United converted 25 orders for the A350-900 to -1000's, plus another 10 aircraft in June of 2013. The first of the 35 deliveries is currently published to start in 2018.

The EASA granted 370 minutes ETOPS last week, FAA reviews flight test data next (787 has 330 minute ETOPS for comparison). The 350 flight tests have been virtually flawless and production is ramping up MUCH faster than the 787. The -1000 which will compete with the 777X will almost certainly beat the Boeing product to market.
Reply
Old 10-18-2014 | 09:54 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CRM114
Considering the McQuality that Boeing is turning these days, I'm not sure it matters.

To the OP:

United converted 25 orders for the A350-900 to -1000's, plus another 10 aircraft in June of 2013. The first of the 35 deliveries is currently published to start in 2018.

The EASA granted 370 minutes ETOPS last week, FAA reviews flight test data next (787 has 330 minute ETOPS for comparison). The 350 flight tests have been virtually flawless and production is ramping up MUCH faster than the 787. The -1000 which will compete with the 777X will almost certainly beat the Boeing product to market.
Thats an awful lot of speculation
Reply
Old 10-19-2014 | 06:30 AM
  #10  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

Doesn't seem like a lot to me. He just opined that the -350 will beat the 777X to market. The rest is verifiable fact.

I jumpseated (jumpsat?) on a 787 once. For all the hype, I wasn't all that impressed. The screens are big, and I guess they are cheap to replace (compared to current MFDs), but they almost seemed too big for an easy scan.

I hope we do get the A-350. I really liked the 320, even with its quirks. Boeing's cockpit layout still has its roots in the XB-15 of the 1930s. I get tired of craning to see around the control column on approach, or the awkward balance of eating my crew meal with a seat I can never move back quite far enough. Significant on an airplane that can fly for 12 hours or more. The Bus cockpits have a reputation for being roomy, quiet, and comfortable.

Other than the 380, I'm not aware of any major program glitches Airbus has had. Boeing had issues with the 707 (gear trucks), 727 (#2 engine compressor stalls), 737 (drag/range in the -100), 747 (engines); the -800 had lots of problems (including flutter) for a growth aircraft. The 757, 767, and 777 had no major issues I know of; and the 787 is legendary.

So, given the current status of the A-350 program, CRM's estimate seems reasonable to me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Sniper
Aviation Law
13
11-15-2009 08:16 PM
SrfNFly227
Regional
179
10-16-2009 10:12 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
jetsetter44
Corporate
4
08-04-2008 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices