![]() |
Originally Posted by Dash8Pilot
(Post 895699)
Almost nobody at SkyWest wants to do this flying...
|
Originally Posted by dosbo
(Post 895742)
Perhaps restricting the jumpseat from regional crewmembers would create enough of a cluster that management would have to do something.
|
Originally Posted by Dash8Pilot
(Post 895699)
Almost nobody at SkyWest wants to do this flying......
Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
(Post 895744)
So don't do it. Or are you saying "Almost nobody, but there are just a few that are eager at the opportunity"?
Last time I checked Dash, no one from Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge is holding a gun to your head for the Death March.....and the "Were not Unionized" at SkyWest, doesn't hold water in my book either. Believe me, the UAL pilot group already knows the outcome of this style of tactic, and the alternative is grim. Banded vs Unbanded?? That's child's play....SCOPE is ONE thing we ALL see eye to eye on.....Let the games begin. Good luck on that. |
Originally Posted by Captain Bligh
(Post 895747)
Chartered Non-Rev only flights to bring in pilots? The economy is tight, kids want to fly bad enough, if they told them move there or no job, they would all move. What a shame the MECs have recently demonstrated such dysfunction and non-unity. This would be a great time to shine with some real leadership... hint.
Bring that flying in-house and the problem will be solved. Furloughs returned and more pilots hired at a major for a career that has actual growth opportunities for a lifetime, maybe. You are right this profession is in serious need of leadership from both the union and management. |
I'm glad you posted this 757Driver. To me it brings to light the fact that we should STOP the bickering about banding, and return our focus to getting the JCBA done STAT with Scope nailed down. I keep hearing that the CAL guys are on their forums saying "take your time.. no rush" to getting this deal done, so hopefully THIS arrogant move by management will change that philosophy.
By the way, Skywest is shrinking its ORD presence by about half to move the airplanes down to IAH. Clearly its the CAL pilots who are going to lose in this latest Scope nightmare. The only way I see to stem this tide is refocus on the SCOPE in our JCBA and move past this ridiculous banding vs. unbanding issue. KILL the 70's. |
Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
(Post 895751)
Banded vs Unbanded?? That's child's play....SCOPE is ONE thing we ALL see eye to eye on.....Let the games begin.
Good luck on that. |
Originally Posted by luv757
(Post 895911)
+1. I won't launch into my feeling on it here but this is the REAL threat here boys. Not a couple of bucks an hour on an airplane but getting ZERO bucks an hour because the job got outsourced, or taking a huge hit in pay as you move to the right seat from the left seat.
I don't fly the 'short bus', nor am I a Mensa Scholar......but I know one thing......you have to be/remain on property first in order to collect in the riches/rates/benefits of any future JCBA (regardless of pay structure). No qualms about it, we are seriously on 'hells brink' concerning SCOPE as it relates to this new company and the entire industry from this point forward. |
Originally Posted by 757Driver
(Post 895575)
Just wondering what we CAL folks can do in response to Skywest and Shuttle America violating our scope agreement in our CBA. I know I for one won't be allowing any of them on my jumpseat to get work to violate my contract.
That'll show 'em. |
Originally Posted by boxer6
(Post 895605)
Man, Sorry to see this bunch of crap. Looks like Smisek has been hanging around Glenn too much...although, deep down, I don't think he needs Glenn's tutledge one iota.
I bet this is one topic where you and the UAL guys will be in lock step with one another. Contrary to popular belief, SMISEK is the CEO, BUT NOT the Chairman and Won't be for the next 2 years. Let him NOT stay with the "Corporate LINE" as far as the scope stands as it is today? And you'll see HIM leaving as for "other opportunities" as "mysteriously" as your Former CEO left. Tilton doesn't CARE what Smisek's ideas are, And? For the next 2 years Smisek will be "Grinning and Bearing it". Unlesss you guys NEGOTIATE the scope restrictions away? They won't be going Anywhere!! So what you guys might need to do is quit "haggling" about Nothing and Start worrying about SOMETHING because Scope is going to bite you in the Butt a damn sight Harder than whether Banding the 747/777 is viable.. Maybe you didn't live through the 1113 hearings but let me make this PERFECTLY clear. Tilton is EVERY BIT as sharp as ANYBODY in ALPA and TWICE as Treacherous. You'd better be getting up Earlier and staying up LATER if you plan to best him. "Just a word to the wise". |
Originally Posted by strfyr51
(Post 895968)
************************************************** **********
Contrary to popular belief, SMISEK is the CEO, BUT NOT the Chairman and Won't be for the next 2 years. Let him NOT stay with the "Corporate LINE" as far as the scope stands as it is today? And you'll see HIM leaving as for "other opportunities" as "mysteriously" as your Former CEO left. Tilton doesn't CARE what Smisek's ideas are, And? For the next 2 years Smisek will be "Grinning and Bearing it". Unlesss you guys NEGOTIATE the scope restrictions away? They won't be going Anywhere!! So what you guys might need to do is quit "haggling" about Nothing and Start worrying about SOMETHING because Scope is going to bite you in the Butt a damn sight Harder than whether Banding the 747/777 is viable.. Maybe you didn't live through the 1113 hearings but let me make this PERFECTLY clear. Tilton is EVERY BIT as sharp as ANYBODY in ALPA and TWICE as Treacherous. You'd better be getting up Earlier and staying up LATER if you plan to best him. "Just a word to the wise". |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands