Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL Council 57 (LAX) Update >

UAL Council 57 (LAX) Update

Search
Notices

UAL Council 57 (LAX) Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2010, 06:51 AM
  #41  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 10
Default

Ah, I see SuperFluf already quoted my first response to FlyGuppy. Sorry for the double-post. Back to my cave now...

-Neal
Neal Schwartz is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 08:46 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dumpcheck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 126
Default

Originally Posted by bearcat View Post
Just because it wasn't used at one place, doesn't mean it wont be used at another. EVERYTHING is up for argument for the SLI. There is NO way around that.
Everything is on the table until both sides legally agree to take something off...hence the suggestion to take the JCBA off: legally exclude our future 747/777 (all actually) payrates from an argument about career expectations held in May 2010 (or earlier). This is mind-numbingly simple in principle...
dumpcheck is offline  
Old 11-07-2010, 12:46 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
Bph320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 50
Default

I posted this on another thread but felt it belonged here more

The fundamental issue regarding the pay structure is what planes fit into the different categories for pay ie. *Wide body/ Narrow Body etc. * *On one hand I believe that the 747 should not be in the same category as a 767 because there is a huge difference in range and capabilities. *That includes the 767-400 comparison. * On the other hand the 747-400 will be gone in the next 7 years regardless because of the age of the aircraft. * Currently the oldest one flying is 21 years old and the newest is about 10 years old. *Assuming UAL is not planning on buying newer 747s or A380s I personally wouldn't want the "premier" pay rate to disappear along with the planes. I would want the highest pay to remain in place for the majority of the widebody flying. *

That being said these issues need to be settled and we all need to move forward. * We can debate all day how we would be better off without each other had the merger never happened. The fact is that our metaphorical parents are married to each other now and we all have many more toys to play with now than we had before. **The CAL pilots now have a lot of wide body flying that they didn't before and personally as a UAL pilot I am happy to see more domestic flying available. * I believe that those who advocate not talking and letting JCBA issue linger should wake the hell up. *We are all on the same side in the end. *
Bph320 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dvhighdrive88
Major
6
04-03-2008 11:49 PM
WatchThis!
Major
28
04-03-2008 10:21 AM
dvhighdrive88
Major
37
02-11-2008 08:10 PM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
06-16-2005 11:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices