Wendy's Video
10-09-2011 | 02:43 PM
#61
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
bumped,
Wrong, the 1113c "dream sheet" from the company became nothing once the required negotiations went into play. Wedoff could not have ruled on anything other than the "last/best offer" from the company in the required negotiations. Not the original term sheet. In other words, you would have gotten the same contract with a "amendable date" of BK exit. Doesn't mean you'd have a contract today. But, you would have been in section 6 since that date. And, that much closer to release.
This is not interpretation but precedent. The "contract" would have been no worse than the one you have, and would be open for renegotiation once the company exited.
Now, if you want to talk about the merits of "fair and equitable," then in my opinion, Wedoff could have never ruled in the company's favor in an 1113c ruling based on the percentage of concessions being sought from the pilots relative to the other groups. That is of course based upon competant legal counsel.......we had Cohen Weiss and Sh*thead.....same folks TWA had.
Their legal scorecard since the 70's isn't too impressive. For some reason ALPA Nat'l endorses them. They are a labor law firm and never should have been the lead in the BK process.
Frats,
Lee
Wrong, the 1113c "dream sheet" from the company became nothing once the required negotiations went into play. Wedoff could not have ruled on anything other than the "last/best offer" from the company in the required negotiations. Not the original term sheet. In other words, you would have gotten the same contract with a "amendable date" of BK exit. Doesn't mean you'd have a contract today. But, you would have been in section 6 since that date. And, that much closer to release.
This is not interpretation but precedent. The "contract" would have been no worse than the one you have, and would be open for renegotiation once the company exited.
Now, if you want to talk about the merits of "fair and equitable," then in my opinion, Wedoff could have never ruled in the company's favor in an 1113c ruling based on the percentage of concessions being sought from the pilots relative to the other groups. That is of course based upon competant legal counsel.......we had Cohen Weiss and Sh*thead.....same folks TWA had.
Their legal scorecard since the 70's isn't too impressive. For some reason ALPA Nat'l endorses them. They are a labor law firm and never should have been the lead in the BK process.
Frats,
Lee
10-11-2011 | 08:36 AM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Cub Cap
He is the father of the 3 year LEC term. That idea moved the LEC representatives away from their constituents and is part of the reason the MEC is dysfunctional.
10-11-2011 | 08:39 AM
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
You may want to get use to him, Mr. RJ, "information is bad" Rice is on the leader board for the concessionists. His problem, if he gets Wendy's eight votes, he will be looking at being recalled after the next election cycle.
He is the father of the 3 year LEC term. That idea moved the LEC representatives away from their constituents and is part of the reason the MEC is dysfunctional.
He is the father of the 3 year LEC term. That idea moved the LEC representatives away from their constituents and is part of the reason the MEC is dysfunctional.
10-11-2011 | 07:59 PM
#66
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
