|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1123651)
If you "got it" we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Your assumption that dexim is "under skin" is a clear miss, this is incorrect. However the resolution to nullify the offender - "Operation ignore" should be fully and completely adopted and implemented, without delay...I concur. Let the games begin. Cheers, Horhay |
Originally Posted by Horhay
(Post 1123738)
You sir, are incorrect. What you're apparently lacking is the context for the aforementioned comment. The intent was to intimate to the masses that whilst "he" (read dexim) my be of a certain opinion, he represents a rapidly growing minority of those within the L-UAL camp. I, like many others imho, intend not to dwell/anchor in the thrash that has occurred as of late amongst our collective "pilot group". While the lessons learned shouldn't be lost going forward, neither should they be the focus of our "collective" attention. Therefore I felt the best methodology to surmise and convey my thoughts/feelings regarding this issue was to simply state "got-it" (translated = message received and understood, but less wordy and stuff). At that point the stage is set to discontinue engaging in discussion regarding related subject matter, no further discussion expected or required.
Your assumption that dexim is "under skin" is a clear miss, this is incorrect. However the resolution to nullify the offender - "Operation ignore" should be fully and completely adopted and implemented, without delay...I concur. Let the games begin. Cheers, Horhay |
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1123140)
let's recap:
- cal mec chairman testifies for company against ual mec in training lawsuit. Something about the ual mec wanting to much training. - cal mec leadership sends out email to cal pilots explaining why they had to split with ual mec on training lawsuit. Something about pride, profession and the cal way of life. - cal mec chairman accepts a company designed plan to give the cal pilots profit sharing and leaving the ual mec with no way to negotiate for equal treatment under the tpa. Something about ual mec asking for to much. Summary: I'll leave that up to you! remember we are talking about accountability and unity. |
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1123529)
You are joking - right!
|
Originally Posted by UalHvy
(Post 1123829)
No, I'm not joking. Just what purpose does it serve to beat it to death on this message board?
Not beating it to death - Just trying to keep it alive. We can't afford to have it happen again and there is no indication from either MEC that it won't. |
This character, what's he call himself, Dexim?
Obviously a management plant trying to stir up some angst. Let's move along, shall we? |
Originally Posted by Ontheleft
(Post 1123944)
This character, what's he call himself, Dexim?
Obviously a management plant trying to stir up some angst. Let's move along, shall we? |
Originally Posted by Horhay
(Post 1123977)
All you're doing is feeding the beast...copy, ignore and we're all better off
|
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1123140)
Let's recap:
- CAL MEC Chairman testifies for company against UAL MEC in training lawsuit. Something about the UAL MEC wanting to much training. - CAL MEC leadership sends out Email to CAL pilots explaining why they had to split with UAL MEC on training lawsuit. Something about pride, profession and the CAL way of life. - CAL MEC Chairman accepts a company designed plan to give the CAL pilots Profit Sharing and leaving the UAL MEC with no way to negotiate for equal treatment under the TPA. Something about UAL MEC asking for to much. Summary: I'll leave that up to you! Remember we are talking about Accountability and Unity.
Originally Posted by Ontheleft
(Post 1123944)
This character, what's he call himself, Dexim?
Obviously a management plant trying to stir up some angst. Let's move along, shall we? As I remember it - Dexim had nothing to do with it. CAL MEC and membership were responsible. Explain how Dexim is responsible and how/why he should be held accountable. |
Originally Posted by dexim
(Post 1124066)
As I remember it - Dexim had nothing to do with it. CAL MEC and membership were responsible. Explain how Dexim is responsible and how/why he should be held accountable.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands