![]() |
Originally Posted by A320
Chicago isn't what I want however I'll take a Chicago winter before a Houston summer any day.
Regarding bids I suspect the SCal bids in DEN will go very senior while the SUAL bids in IAH will go relatively junior. I think the TDY A320 IAH flying will go senior. Actually I think ORD will be easily filled as well....even if by all UAL pilots from the bottom of the list. I cannot believe we will get to a situation for DEN and ORD where we have to volunteer for TDY or have involuntary assignments there. We have how many at the bottom of the CAL seniority list now who are furloughed L-UAL pilots? I would think that if not one CAL pilot bids the 140 positions available at these two bases that 140 UAL pilots at the bottom wouldn't get these positions if they put them on their bid choices. |
Originally Posted by Once United
It would be better if nobody(CAL/UAL) took any of these bids and let the company pay to move/house people for a TDY operation. Greed probably won't allow that. We should do what the MEC wouldn't do. Make the company give us a JCBA through our actions.
I'll flat out say right now that I've updated my standing bid screen to show DEN/ORD CA and FO slots as my next to last choices...right above GUM CA/FO. Won't be an issue on this bid, but family obligations rules out GUM for many of us. |
Originally Posted by A320
(Post 1144407)
The LCAs should stop VOLUNTEERING to do IOE work until the JCBA is reached. The doesn't violate the court order or the RLA for that matter. This place will grind to a halt
Any LCA's on this board care to respond? |
Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".
|
Originally Posted by UalHvy
(Post 1144686)
Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1144717)
What do you mean by the " dark side"?
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1144717)
What do you mean by the " dark side"?
|
Originally Posted by UalHvy
(Post 1144846)
You can't really be that clueless.
|
Originally Posted by UalHvy
(Post 1144686)
Too many of the LCAs are on the "dark side".
Bitter? Nope. |
Simple question:
Why are LCA's still volunteering their services? Answer: Silence. Simple question I asked 8 years ago: What is my union doing to save my job? Answer: Silence. Welcome to United Airlines - Every man for himself. |
Originally Posted by UAL SUX
(Post 1145085)
Simple question:
Why are LCA's still volunteering their services? Answer: Silence. Simple question I asked 8 years ago: What is my union doing to save my job? Answer: Silence. Welcome to United Airlines - Every man for himself. 1) Are you currently flying for someone? 2) IF you are, why don't you simply stop coming to work? That's in essence what you are asking LCA to stop doing their job. They can just as soon stop giving line checks and training as you can stop showing up for your pairings. You want THEM to put THEIR collective jobs on the line? Does it state somewhere in the UAL contract that in the event of a furlough that LCAs don't have to conduct training anymore? If it doesn't, then what you are suggesting would be illegal job action and could get people in big trouble if suggested by someone with a leadership position. Add in the fact that if one or two LCA decided to quit, 1 or 2 more would just step up and fill those positions. You're living in a fantasy world. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 1145236)
A few simple questions for you UAL SUX:
1) Are you currently flying for someone? 2) IF you are, why don't you simply stop coming to work? That's in essence what you are asking LCA to stop doing their job. They can just as soon stop giving line checks and training as you can stop showing up for your pairings. You want THEM to put THEIR collective jobs on the line? Does it state somewhere in the UAL contract that in the event of a furlough that LCAs don't have to conduct training anymore? If it doesn't, then what you are suggesting would be illegal job action and could get people in big trouble if suggested by someone with a leadership position. Add in the fact that if one or two LCA decided to quit, 1 or 2 more would just step up and fill those positions. You're living in a fantasy world. |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 1145236)
A few simple questions for you UAL SUX:
1) Are you currently flying for someone? 2) IF you are, why don't you simply stop coming to work? That's in essence what you are asking LCA to stop doing their job. They can just as soon stop giving line checks and training as you can stop showing up for your pairings. You want THEM to put THEIR collective jobs on the line? Does it state somewhere in the UAL contract that in the event of a furlough that LCAs don't have to conduct training anymore? If it doesn't, then what you are suggesting would be illegal job action and could get people in big trouble if suggested by someone with a leadership position. Add in the fact that if one or two LCA decided to quit, 1 or 2 more would just step up and fill those positions. You're living in a fantasy world. See iadfo's post above. |
Originally Posted by iadfo
(Post 1145277)
Actually its not a fantasy world, this has happened in the real world in the past. I had an opportunity to witness it. You see, being an LCA is something you volunteer to do. Each individual who is an LCA is one because they want to, and not because they have to. If that individual decides they don't want to be an LCA, they still get to come to work and be an airline pilot. During the summer of 2000 a large number of LCA's at UA made an individual personal decision that they no longer wanted to be LCA's. And someone was not right behind them to fill their shoes, because nobody really wanted to do anything special for the company, since the company didnt want to do anything for us. Nothing illegal about changing your mind. Only organized job actions are illegal. But you are right, in this case someone else will just step up and do it. CAL pilots don't have the same culture when it comes to not helping the company out. Someone is always willing to help here. It aint wrong, just different.
Hopefully we have that kind of unity on the UAL side currently but I think I may already know the answer to that one. :( |
I know, I was being Kind.
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1144916)
Not clueless at all...It was a joke to continue the thought...Relax...
|
Originally Posted by iadfo
(Post 1145277)
Actually its not a fantasy world, this has happened in the real world in the past. I had an opportunity to witness it. You see, being an LCA is something you volunteer to do. Each individual who is an LCA is one because they want to, and not because they have to. If that individual decides they don't want to be an LCA, they still get to come to work and be an airline pilot. During the summer of 2000 a large number of LCA's at UA made an individual personal decision that they no longer wanted to be LCA's. And someone was not right behind them to fill their shoes, because nobody really wanted to do anything special for the company, since the company didnt want to do anything for us. Nothing illegal about changing your mind. Only organized job actions are illegal. But you are right, in this case someone else will just step up and do it. CAL pilots don't have the same culture when it comes to not helping the company out. Someone is always willing to help here. It aint wrong, just different.
If what you say happened back in 2000 is true, that's news to me. However since then, your union has received an injunction which has in essence cut themselves off at the knees. We're playing the game with both hands tied behind our backs. Has UAL guys stopped picking up open time? No. I know for sure that hasn't happened at CAL (It's considered a "right" here at CAL) and will never happen here without a huge change in culture. We basically need a clause in our contract like UPS that allows a union to ban open time during a furlough. We don't have that now. Have you talked to your reps to make sure that's in the new contract? |
Originally Posted by Zoomie
(Post 1145391)
Sure, perhaps if each individual pilot decided on their own as a LCA they no longer wanted the job, they could quit their LCA duties, but the union organizing such a thing would be illegal. I think you agree here.
If what you say happened back in 2000 is true, that's news to me. However since then, your union has received an injunction which has in essence cut themselves off at the knees. We're playing the game with both hands tied behind our backs. Has UAL guys stopped picking up open time? No. I know for sure that hasn't happened at CAL (It's considered a "right" here at CAL) and will never happen here without a huge change in culture. We basically need a clause in our contract like UPS that allows a union to ban open time during a furlough. We don't have that now. Have you talked to your reps to make sure that's in the new contract? |
Originally Posted by ewrflyr
(Post 1144525)
i'll flat out say right now that i've updated my standing bid screen to show den/ord ca and fo slots as my next to last choices...right above gum ca/fo.
|
Originally Posted by 13n144e
(Post 1145486)
hey!!........ ;)
|
When are the snapshots again and where can we find those results?
|
Originally Posted by beeker
(Post 1145927)
When are the snapshots again and where can we find those results?
|
What is the snapshot?
|
Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
(Post 1146244)
What is the snapshot?
|
Originally Posted by guppyflyer
(Post 1143680)
13-04
243 vacancies 35 737 crews to ORD & DEN starting 9/12 No SFO or 767 in LUAL domiciles |
Thanks WarEagle, where can you see it?
|
Originally Posted by Coto Pilot
(Post 1146309)
Thanks WarEagle, where can you see it?
|
Originally Posted by GGG 2172
(Post 1146293)
So what exactly does starting 9/12 mean? Is that when they expect the base to open with all pilots trained and ready to go? Or does it mean training starts 9/12 to fill those slots. If they needed additional UAL furloughees to fill those slots, could one expect to be trained prior to that date? TIA!
|
Originally Posted by GGG 2172
(Post 1146293)
So what exactly does starting 9/12 mean? Is that when they expect the base to open with all pilots trained and ready to go? Or does it mean training starts 9/12 to fill those slots. If they needed additional UAL furloughees to fill those slots, could one expect to be trained prior to that date? TIA!
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1146362)
This has got nothing to do with LUAL pilots. This all about LCAL. We might as well not even exist.
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1146376)
Bases are to be staffed to support ops in Sept, so Ual furloughed or off the street hires will need to be trained to fill vacancies. Just finished my annual MV/LOE and was told they expect to hire off the street based on the historical UA take rate and train throughout the summer, to cover vacancies. We'll see....but can't see how they can fill vacancies across the 737 without training this summer and hiring (as there are no reductions).
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1146376)
Bases are to be staffed to support ops in Sept, so Ual furloughed or off the street hires will need to be trained to fill vacancies. Just finished my annual MV/LOE and was told they expect to hire off the street based on the historical UA take rate and train throughout the summer, to cover vacancies. We'll see....but can't see how they can fill vacancies across the 737 without training this summer and hiring (as there are no reductions).
This just in... The pre-summer training may overflow into May, but will not likely reach your seniority. They expect the Sept. 2012 slots to be filled by pilots already on the property (that was from Chen) followed by... There will be additional hiring in the fall, but the slots in the new bases will be filled by re-balancing the pilots they have on property for the summer. As I understand it, September is the right time for this kind of re-arranging of manpower because of the seasonal reduction in manpower requirements following Labor Day. Manpower planning is very complicated, and the subject does not lend itself to easy description in newsletters! |
Will LCAL pilots have their own Flight Ops at DEN and ORD or will they share the LUAL Flight Ops, and same with LUAL pilots in IAH? If so, are the LCAL planes now occupying gates close to LUAL Ops? Sorry if this is a dumb question, I've been out of the loop for awhile.
|
Originally Posted by Slammer
(Post 1146376)
Bases are to be staffed to support ops in Sept, so Ual furloughed or off the street hires will need to be trained to fill vacancies. Just finished my annual MV/LOE and was told they expect to hire off the street based on the historical UA take rate and train throughout the summer, to cover vacancies. We'll see....but can't see how they can fill vacancies across the 737 without training this summer and hiring (as there are no reductions).
It wouldn't surprise me if they went with 1-2 small classes/mo throughout the summer. This would be a slowdown but not complete shutdown of training. |
Snapshot is out.
|
Snapshot is out. |
Originally Posted by bkaz
(Post 1147270)
We're there enough takers to fill the new bases? How senior are they?
|
Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
(Post 1147275)
Yes. Denver went wayyy senior. Guam is way junior. Others were typical spread.
What sort of DOH was the junior captain and what base? |
Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
(Post 1147277)
What sort of DOH was the junior captain and what base?
|
Originally Posted by Blockoutblockin
(Post 1147286)
Preliminarily the DOH is 7/26/2005 in Guam.
What is the DOH of junior Capt in EWR and IAH. How about junior pilot DOH on EWR 757 and 777. Just curious. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands