![]() |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1167242)
I don't think anybody is getting their panties in a bunch so to speak. The
'I Pads by August' debacle is a fitting example of the cluster **** that is Fred's Flying Circus. Therefore anytime he and his underlings try to make themselves look world class I call them out for the pathetic Yes Men that they are. I think most agree that the poop shovels of merger integration by memo to both pilot groups is a much more fitting example of United Flight Ops showing 'dignity and respect'. |
Originally Posted by Old UCAL CA
(Post 1167290)
Sounds like "panties in a bunch"....;)
|
Originally Posted by Ottopilot
(Post 1167208)
I haven't seen any video, nor do I care to. I have used the iPad belonging to a check airman I flew with. It works just fine. Plus, I can look up stuff in manuals normally located at home. From what I'm told, its just a ebook reader. Your manuals will be put on it. Eventually, after an adjustment period, you won't need paper manuals. Plug in, battery, etc are not a problem because I rarely look something up anyway. Later on, iPads will be installed in the aircraft with Jepps on it. They will be mounted and have power. You will still carry the iPad reader for your manuals too. So, there will be four ipads minimum per aircraft. The test one had Jepps and it worked great; Enroute charts and all. I could care less about iPads, but the idea of dumping all manuals and Jepps someday will be worth it. One pound vs. 45 pounds. Easy choice. I'm not sure why people are getting their panties in a bunch about this?
To paraphrase from another forum post, it takes a lot to make the iPad as completely useless as they've made it. Kudos to UCH. FWIW, at UAl we don't carry manuals anymore, so this is actually a huge inconvenience. I have to make sure it is charged and up to date, yet UCH doesn't provide me a wireless connection at even one of our domiciles, and they most certainly don't pay me to charge it at home. They've removed most of the "useful" functions that I might use to make my life easier and take ownership of the device by eliminating the ability to upgrade the device through the app store. They have also made it quite clear that it is to be used only for UCH functions, so like the flight bag I used to carry, it will stay at work. Further, its functionality is exceptionally poor, and the implementation is worse. When required to carry one, it will go right back into my "secure" V file between trips. If stolen by the cleaning crew that vacuums the floors, I'll be happy to file a police report and get another from the office. I just hope that there is a charge plug withing reach of my V file so that it will be ready to deploy when I get to work. I currently work for a company that has so completely devalued what I do for them, that I simply do the absolute minimum required. Just the way it is. Unfortunate, but they made that bed. I'm not alone. Not by a long shot. |
To All:
UAL is now rolling out the iPads to all line pilots. They say, "PLAN ON 10-15 MINUTES TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVATION;" I have this to say: I won't pick one up on my time. Either pay me to come in and pick it up before a flight, or the flight will leave late based on time to do it. IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me. |
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 1168152)
To All:
UAL is now rolling out the iPads to all line pilots. They say, "PLAN ON 10-15 MINUTES TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVATION;" I have this to say: I won't pick one up on my time. Either pay me to come in and pick it up before a flight, or the flight will leave late based on time to do it. IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me. I don't know how UAL ALPA let this one slip by - Maybe because it's not required and people are doing it for free. Not Me! |
+2. Me either.
|
Originally Posted by Scott Stoops
(Post 1168148)
I currently work for a company that has so completely devalued what I do for them, that I simply do the absolute minimum required. Just the way it is. Unfortunate, but they made that bed. I'm not alone. Not by a long shot.
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 1168152)
To All:
IT and non-contract people decree something not in accordance witht the contract. Not for me. Summer of 2012, you can just feel the love. |
Spy on you, "no criminal intent"
Robbins v. Lower Merion School District is a federal class action lawsuit, brought in February 2010 on behalf of students of two high schools in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania suburbs.[2] In October 2010, the school district agreed to pay $610,000 to settle the Robbins and parallel Hasan lawsuits against it.[1]
The suit alleged that, in what was dubbed the "WebcamGate" scandal, the schools secretly spied on the students while they were in the privacy of their homes.[3][4] School authorities surreptitiously and remotely activated webcams embedded in school-issued laptops the students were using at home.[5][6] After the suit was brought, the school district, of which the two high schools are part, revealed that it had secretly snapped more than 66,000 images.[7][8] The suit charged that in doing so the district infringed on its students' privacy rights.[5][9][10] A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction, ordering the school district to stop its secret webcam monitoring, and ordered the district to pay the plaintiffs' attorney fees.[11][12][13] The lawsuit was filed after 15-year-old high school sophomore Blake Robbins was disciplined at school, for his behavior in his home.[5][13] The school's "evidence" that triggered his discipline was a photograph that the school had secretly taken of him in his bedroom, via the webcam in his school-issued laptop. Without telling its students, the schools remotely accessed their school-issued laptops to secretly snap pictures of students in their own homes, their chat logs, and records of the websites they visited. The school then transmitted the snapshots to servers at the school, where school authorities reviewed them and shared the snapshots with others.[14] In one widely published photo, the school had photographed Robbins in his bed.[15] The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), U.S. Attorney's Office, and Montgomery County District Attorney all initiated criminal investigations of the matter, which they combined and then closed because they did not find evidence "that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone involved had criminal intent". In addition, a U.S. Senate Judiciary subcommittee held hearings on the issues raised by the schools' secret surveillance, and Senator Arlen Specter introduced draft legislation in the Senate to protect against it in the future. Parents, media, and academicians criticized the schools, and the matter was cited as a cautionary example of how modern technology can be used to infringe on personal privacy.[16] |
The bigg question is can you get Porn on it?????????????
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:25 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands