|
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1172016)
I think what WE think doesn't matter and that you must be a real hoot to fly with. You're not being the devils advocate, you're just being a tool.
Couldn't have said it better |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 1172016)
I think what WE think doesn't matter and that you must be a real hoot to fly with. You're not being the devils advocate, you're just being a tool.
|
EBP,
Frendo, you've tossed more stink bombs than anyone else I can think of on this forum. So don't be surprised when someone calls you out on it. Admit it, that was a stupid thing to say. Just like your other post about training .... <<"And the new UAL way..............except that it costs us ANOTHER DAY OFF without PAY................. Yep, let's go "practice" our checkride and do it all again the next day! From everyone I've talked to, the "extra day" is a joke. Are the L-UAL pilots so "unprepared" that they need a warmup session? THAT is scary...............">> Now that was a real team builder wasn't it? As if we have anything at all to do with LCAL training schedules (thank your UCAL management) and the CAL contract which allows you guys to work for free. Sounds like a problem with your contract, not the LUAL pilots. Then there was the beauty about the UAL guys going after the CAL pilots on the PS debacle We filed a grievance against UCAL management, not CAL pilots. A grievance that will help all the UAL pilots in the long run. Over and over UAL guys posted that they were not against your getting PS, only the way it was done. Have a swell day! "ACE". (There ya go again) |
Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
(Post 1171950)
Okay, I'll be the devil's advocate here. Suppose you were hired at CAL in 2005, have seven years of longevity at CAL, and now pilots who were hired at UAL in 99 or later and had only been on property two or three years before they were furloughed, were being told they would go in FRONT of you when you clearly have MORE years on property, what would you think? It's going to be interesting to say the least................:o
I guess I don't see where "more years on property" has to do with anything. I thought it was called a "seniority list" not a "longevity list". |
Because ALPA merger policy is inclusive of longevity as one of its foundational pieces.
|
Originally Posted by Lerxst
(Post 1172556)
Because ALPA merger policy is inclusive of longevity as one of its foundational pieces.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands