Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Luv the TA >

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Luv the TA

Search
Notices

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Luv the TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2012, 11:09 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Originally Posted by El Gwopo View Post
If THIS management team has agreed to this TA then you can bet they see something they can exploit.

I will be unfortunately be voting NO until we get a new management team. They are the absolute scum of the earth. They hate us and want us ALL outsourced. Period.
If enough pilots vote no and turn it down, it may pressure the board to consider a new team. Let's face it, so far the merger has been a complete cluster and the resulting airline is lame. We know it, our long time pax know it and Wall Street knows it. DAL is mopping up and we're parking planes. I'm going to vote ush irrespective of what the TA looks like. We've taken it in the shorts since 9-11 and much of their case was bogus. Now, instead of getting the troops back on board, they're increasing the pressure and coming after us. Ush! FTP.
oldmako is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 11:14 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
I rest my case.
What?

This management team have proven themselves as UNTRUSTWORTHY. I do not deal with these people.

no
El Gwopo is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 11:47 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by El Gwopo View Post
What?

This management team have proven themselves as UNTRUSTWORTHY. I do not deal with these people.

no
I do agree with your description of this management team.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 12:57 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by Bobine View Post
This one line of your post has a lot of merit. The company has a top dollar, they may change parts of the pot to make it better but then will take money from other parts to keep the ceiling intact. It's just a game of shuffling the deck. So what parts is everyone willing to give up to get what they want? No one is going to be 100% satisfied.
So you have succumbed to the "pie theory" eh?
I have not.
liquid is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 01:47 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
I do agree with your description of this management team.
I do appreciate your desire to logically read the entire TA and then formulate your decision. I do feel however that we are dealing with such horrible people that they simply don't deserve my time. If this pilot group knew what this management team thought of us behind closed doors, I think more people would agree with me.
They want us gone. They could care less about you or your family's well being. This is all business and I simply do not do business with whale crap like this.
They are bullies and will try and put the fear of god into us to vote yes. Prepare yourself, the fear train is a comin'!
Just imagine if these bullies received a 80-90% no vote! Their jaws would drop (I could get more creative than jaws drop but I have been warned about my language). Don't give in now people! We just had a 99% strike vote with 95% participating!!! Believe me, they would begin to negotiate. NMB or no NMB, they would negotiate.

Just venting. Can't wait to vote no.
El Gwopo is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 01:57 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

James likes what you're puttin' down. Lemme fly through that cloud.

On a more serious note, all you've got to do is read through the last several mailings published by the Grievance Committee to see what they think of us, our "culture" and our contract.
oldmako is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 02:30 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by Bobine View Post
This one line of your post has a lot of merit. The company has a top dollar, they may change parts of the pot to make it better but then will take money from other parts to keep the ceiling intact. It's just a game of shuffling the deck. So what parts is everyone willing to give up to get what they want? No one is going to be 100% satisfied.
Says who? I'm not saying that they won't try, but its up to us to call their bluff. We pilots are not under any timelines to complete this merger, Smisek is. Why are YOU and others giving him so much slack and making excuses to bend over? Again, pilots talk tough and then make a bunch of excuses to vote yes on a substandard agreement.
Mitch Rapp05 is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 03:14 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Mitch R:

"call their bluff. We pilots are not under any timelines to complete this merger"

First Bobline is almost right in that there is only a top dollar amount any company can afford to pay and finding that amount is part of the art of negotiations.

Now I will also guess you are a CAL pilot and not real senior, one who can benefit from a contract being drug on into the future. Now let me ask, why did pilots vote to strike? Certainly not to drag this negotiations on much longer, we want a contract now! Guess what? Yours and my negotiators, with the help of the NMB, have gotten us a contract agreement. Now it is up to the MECs (which probably have known a lot of the details for quite a long time) to pass it on to their constituents to vote for.

Here's something else I perceive, If the TA is voted yes on by the MECs I'll bet you and many others will have a cow about them sending such a "substandard" product for the ignorant and no guts pilot population to vote on.

Relax you will get to vote and that is the limit of the power you and I have. If you want to have a bigger say run for election and represent us tough talking gutless pilots before your fellow MEC members.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 04:26 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UalHvy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Default

Regular Guy...

Agree 100%
UalHvy is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 04:30 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy View Post
Mitch R:
Now it is up to the MECs (which probably have known a lot of the details for quite a long time) to pass it on to their constituents to vote for.

Here's something else I perceive, If the TA is voted yes on by the MECs I'll bet you and many others will have a cow about them sending such a "substandard" product for the ignorant and no guts pilot population to vote on.
Are you insinuating that it is the duty of the MEC to rubber stamp the TA and pass it on to the membership, or should they carefully consider it and send it back to the negotiators if it is "substandard?"
SpecialTracking is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices