Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
UAL offer street hires classes? >

UAL offer street hires classes?

Search

Notices

UAL offer street hires classes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2013 | 10:14 AM
  #371  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
Guys dress conservatively as mentioned above. Dark Blue suits tend to give the appearance of trimming your figure, if you have a very skinny build then a gray suit might work better for you as it has the appearance of adding a bit of bulk.

Also and this a very important point. Always frame your stories up in a positive light. When I talk to interview captains they all tell me stories of this guy:

Why are you thinking of leaving your current employer?

"Because my old company SUXS!" ......WRONG ANSWER!

I am looking to advance my career and would LOVE to fly wide body aircraft. (Something in this light is the right answer.)

I had an interview captain tell me this story:

Tell us about a time that you had to deal with a difficult crew member?

"Well there was this one phukker!!" (No kidding..)

Remember the most dangerous interviewer is the super nice guy. Don't get too comfortable with the interview captain they are NOT your buddy, Don't allow yourself to become to relaxed this is not a three day trip and you are not on the flight deck BSing with a crew member. Be friendly, be cordial, be yourself, but be professional, don't forget the setting you are being interviewed no matter how comfortable you are made to feel.

Make sure and emphasize your use of CRM principles and run through what stories you'd like to present. If you can't end the story with a positive outcome don't tell that story.

It always helped me to thumb through my log books to help me think of stories. You'd be surprised what you'll remember by just looking through it.

And once again guys and gals. Good luck!

Thanks! Very helpful, I will remember these points in the interview
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 10:24 AM
  #372  
Saabs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 0
From: Airbus button pusher
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
And the big airlines will hire about 10 to 20% of those they interview statistically speaking!

Were you under a different impression of how this works?
Nope the was merely pointing out the wrong guy got hired....
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 10:52 AM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
Default

I still believe the hardest part is just getting the interview.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 11:41 AM
  #374  
Airhoss's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,738
Likes: 5
From: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Default

Originally Posted by Lobaeux
I still believe the hardest part is just getting the interview.
True,

Something to keep in mind guys. You've already got the job when you walk into the interview. They wouldn't have called you in if they didn't want to hire you. You're mission during the course of that interview is to hang on to that job.

In the 2007 era I believe it went up to over the 50% mark, but can't remember the exact average.
I think the current crop of applicants is incredibly well qualified. So at least initially I think you'll see a high number of successful applicants. Just like back in 2007.

In 1997 when I got hired at UAL. There were 28 of us invited to interview that day. 7 made it to the sim ride the following day and 4 were hired. we were a mix of military, major airline and other. In the waiting room I spoke to a Fed Ex guy a SWA guy a UPS guy a TWA guy, myself an AWA guy there were Marines, Navy, Air Force and Coast Guard and smattering of "others" commuter, frieght and GA guys. They hired a Marine, Myself a TWA Guy and the UPS guy.

I'd be willing to bet that most of us did not have the T-PIC and total time that the average RJ guy interviewing today has. This is due to the stagnation during the last decade. But this pool of ultra experienced guys is going to dry up in a year or two. Then it will back to business as usual with a 10% average success rate. Just a SWAG but that's what I think.

Last edited by Airhoss; 03-23-2013 at 11:53 AM.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #375  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss
I'd be willing to bet that most of us did not have the T-PIC and total time that the average RJ guy interviewing today has. This is due to the stagnation during the last decade.
True. Although not as long as back then, the early 90's were a bit of a stagnation period as well. And the "commuters" weren't anywhere near as large back then. So that pool of candidates to draw from in the civilian sector just wasn't as large.

Originally Posted by Airhoss
But this pool of ultra experienced guys is going to dry up in a year or two. Then it will back to business as usual with a 10% average success rate. Just a SWAG but that's what I think.
Kind of going on my previous comment, agree. The first year or two will be (on average and excluding the usual other factors) the ultra-experienced. Followed by the very experienced, then simply just experienced.

Can't tell you how many FO's I flew with that would make the comment of "if I could go sideways right into a job at (insert legacy) without ever having to upgrade that would great!!!!!!"

True, it would be great!!!!! But again, barring the usual outside factors that don't involve flight time, it'll be YEARS before even "high time" regional FO's get a flat out cold call from an airline's HR department. Even BEFORE 9/11 it just simply didn't happen. Although NS did mention that the infamous UAL flight scantron flight time form may include FO jet time in the future. It never happened though.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 05:08 PM
  #376  
LifeNtheFstLne's Avatar
Recommend Retention
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Bigfoot
Default

You are partially incorrect. I have a few friends interviewing at UAL without any turbine PIC time and though 'experienced' they certainly don't have 5,000+ hours of RJ time. And before you speculate, no, they're not women or minorities. They're sharp, well-networked, and good sticks. I hope we hire them. Knowing our recruitment team fairly well, I'm confident they will choose wisely for UAL going forward and cast a wide net.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 05:42 PM
  #377  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
You are partially incorrect. I have a few friends interviewing at UAL without any turbine PIC time and though 'experienced' they certainly don't have 5,000+ hours of RJ time. And before you speculate, no, they're not women or minorities. They're sharp, well-networked, and good sticks. I hope we hire them. Knowing our recruitment team fairly well, I'm confident they will choose wisely for UAL going forward and cast a wide net.
Originally Posted by xjtguy
Kind of going on my previous comment, agree. The first year or two will be (on average and (excluding the usual other factors) the ultra-experienced. Followed by the very experienced, then simply just experienced.

True, it would be great!!!!! But again, barring the usual outside factors that don't involve flight time, it'll be YEARS before even "high time" regional FO's get a flat out cold call from an airline's HR department. Even BEFORE 9/11 it just simply didn't happen. Although NS did mention that the infamous UAL flight scantron flight time form may include FO jet time in the future. It never happened though.
The bold parts are key. You only partially comprehended the post.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 05:56 PM
  #378  
LifeNtheFstLne's Avatar
Recommend Retention
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Bigfoot
Default

I fully comprehended your post. I just want everyone to apply. If you note from those that posted their stats after receiving an email and a phone call, there is very little (if any) consistency. I'm amazed at how many people won't toss their hat in the ring because they assume they won't be selected. You never know... a human still looks at the apps, not everything is left to the computer. Just a thought.
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 06:08 PM
  #379  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
I fully comprehended your post.
Not to be rude, but the "other factors" was there for a reason. To mean that those that meet the mins but are not competitive WITHOUT some kind of connection more than likely won't get a call anytime soon.

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
I just want everyone to apply. If you note from those that posted their stats after receiving an email and a phone call, there is very little (if any) consistency. I'm amazed at how many people won't toss their hat in the ring because they assume they won't be selected. You never know... a human still looks at the apps, not everything is left to the computer. Just a thought.
Thanks, unlike the pre 9/11 method of hiring where it ALL went off the scantron

(mass sarcasm)
Reply
Old 03-23-2013 | 07:49 PM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Originally Posted by LifeNtheFstLne
You are partially incorrect. I have a few friends interviewing at UAL without any turbine PIC time and though 'experienced' they certainly don't have 5,000+ hours of RJ time. And before you speculate, no, they're not women or minorities. They're sharp, well-networked, and good sticks. I hope we hire them. Knowing our recruitment team fairly well, I'm confident they will choose wisely for UAL going forward and cast a wide net.
I had 400 TPIC in a 15K lb turboprop when I got hired. You never know.

Sled
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
1
05-30-2007 03:27 PM
WatchThis!
Hangar Talk
0
04-20-2007 04:45 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM
HSLD
Major
14
01-30-2006 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices