United Airline Apps
#11
The "CIRC APCH-VMC ONLY" limitation is how UAL gives type ratings since about 2003. In 2001 when I upgraded on the 737 we actually did an IMC circling approach in the sim on the Maneuvers Val part of the check-ride. Thus no limitation for that type of mine. The B-757, B767, and A-320 that UAL gave me did not have that as part of the syllabus and thus the limitation. It's not a problem as Op Specs at UAL require 1000 - 3 for circling approaches anyway.
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Also, weren't the previous requirements listed as "must hold a Commercial Pilots License with 1500 Total time and ATP written." I would have assumed that the reason for this was that they would be able to issue you the ATP during your check ride.
But now I believe they want you to go get the ATP on your own, and then apply. Meaning they wont issue the unrestricted ATP with your check ride even if you meet all the requirements for the unrestricted ATP when you interview and get hired.
Correct me if I am wrong please. Thanks!
#15
ALCON:
The "restricted" ATP is a relatively new creation, as a result of the 1500 hour rule that went into effect on 1 Aug of this year. As a result of a law passed after the Colgan Air crash, Congress mandated that ALL pilots flying in Part 121 operations had to hold an ATP, even FO's. Previously, an FO could operate on a Commercial ticket. However, as a result of ALPA efforts, a "restricted" ATP was created by the FAA to allow pilots who received training from either 1) an accredited 4-year aviation university (example: UND), or 2) the military, to obtain a "restricted" ATP with less than the full 1500 hour requirement.
The stipulation being put out is that, for the purposes of being accepted as an applicant to United, you have to have an unrestricted ATP...i.e., not a "restricted" one. I would imagine that all the Majors will put this word out in the near future...the only place I can see accepting "restricted" ATP holders will be the Regionals.
If you have an ATP, and you don't already know that you have a "restricted" one, I'm pretty confident yours is the "unrestricted" variety, and hence, you have nothing to worry about. The VMC circling limitation is not it...I have an unrestricted ATP with that limitation on it.
Also, this answers the question why the past minimum of a Commercial ticket is no longer acceptable.
For the armchair FAA lawyers out there, I'm sure there is some minor detail or two in this explanation that I've left out...my purpose was not to quote chapter and verse, but to answer the general question being posed on this forum.
Now, we could talk about whether the 1500 hour rule was an appropriate answer to the event that precipitated it, but that's a whole different discussion...
The "restricted" ATP is a relatively new creation, as a result of the 1500 hour rule that went into effect on 1 Aug of this year. As a result of a law passed after the Colgan Air crash, Congress mandated that ALL pilots flying in Part 121 operations had to hold an ATP, even FO's. Previously, an FO could operate on a Commercial ticket. However, as a result of ALPA efforts, a "restricted" ATP was created by the FAA to allow pilots who received training from either 1) an accredited 4-year aviation university (example: UND), or 2) the military, to obtain a "restricted" ATP with less than the full 1500 hour requirement.
The stipulation being put out is that, for the purposes of being accepted as an applicant to United, you have to have an unrestricted ATP...i.e., not a "restricted" one. I would imagine that all the Majors will put this word out in the near future...the only place I can see accepting "restricted" ATP holders will be the Regionals.
If you have an ATP, and you don't already know that you have a "restricted" one, I'm pretty confident yours is the "unrestricted" variety, and hence, you have nothing to worry about. The VMC circling limitation is not it...I have an unrestricted ATP with that limitation on it.
Also, this answers the question why the past minimum of a Commercial ticket is no longer acceptable.
For the armchair FAA lawyers out there, I'm sure there is some minor detail or two in this explanation that I've left out...my purpose was not to quote chapter and verse, but to answer the general question being posed on this forum.
Now, we could talk about whether the 1500 hour rule was an appropriate answer to the event that precipitated it, but that's a whole different discussion...
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,508
Likes: 109
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



