OMG Seriously? Fuel Efficiency Training???
04-25-2014, 02:00 PM
#51
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,544
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
1) The A320 fleet was slated to be retired starting in 2015. Then there was a decision to stretch that out to 2020 if they could improve the economics... mainly reliability and efficiency. The reliability has improved with a $40 million some odd investment. The efficiency is really up to us. I'm now hearing that there is talk that the fleet could be stretched to 2025 if the metrics work. Personally, I have no interest in flying the 737 again. So it behooves me to keep the A320 around as LONG as possible. If that means being efficient to sway the case towards making it viable to 2025, I'm on board.
2) We SE taxi around 3% of the time. Delta SE taxi's around 79% of the time. We are last in SE taxi. Why is that? I know on the A320 with the weirdness of the power transfer it can be construed as a safety issue. But Delta flies the A320 and I can't remember a single incident or accident attributable to SE taxi at their airline. Not saying there aren't any.... I just haven't heard of them. Like it or not; for reasons intentional or unintentional, we are at the bottom of fuel efficiency in the industry on our specific fleet, and as an airline in general. That's not something I'm particularly proud of.
3) Environmental issues. Call me a tree-hugger if you will, but it makes no sense to just waste a resource which is finite. Especially when that resource costs $115/barrel.
4) We have a contract. And I will fight to my last breath to defend every word in it against the onslaught of attempts to undermind it. Unfortunately, I'm sure there will be a time to express my displeasure with the fact that we DON'T have a contract through operating EXTREMELY safely, but now is not that time.
5) I've flown with enough FO's who were about to be furloughed, some for the second time, that I know that I hope to God I don't ever have to watch that happen again. If it does happen (and judging by our Q1 results compared to our peers, I'm afraid it will be sooner rather than later as we implode) I want to be able to look them in the eye and say that I have tried hard to do whatever I could to keep them in their seat. ****ing money out the tailpipe for the sake of telling Jeff (who isn't listening) that you're ****ed simply doesn't accomplish that goal.
6) If this airline goes back into Ch11, or worse yet Ch7, I want to be able to look my family in the eye and know that I did my part to make the company successful. See #5.
7) Professional pride. I hate seeing us suck. It's not my fault, and it's not the pilot group's fault by any means, but I still hate it. I'm not proud of being last in the industry in cost effectiveness for things I CAN CONTROL.
I'm sure nothing that I say is going to change your mind. You'll consider me to be a Marvin, and that's fine. You'll accuse me of drinking the KoolAid and that's fine too. I don't answer to you. I don't have my head in the sand. I haven't forgotten the past. And I completely understand why we are where we are. And I still have decided that the best thing for me, my crew, my family, and my fellow pilot group at this point is to operate the airplane efficiently when it makes sense to do so.
2) We SE taxi around 3% of the time. Delta SE taxi's around 79% of the time. We are last in SE taxi. Why is that? I know on the A320 with the weirdness of the power transfer it can be construed as a safety issue. But Delta flies the A320 and I can't remember a single incident or accident attributable to SE taxi at their airline. Not saying there aren't any.... I just haven't heard of them. Like it or not; for reasons intentional or unintentional, we are at the bottom of fuel efficiency in the industry on our specific fleet, and as an airline in general. That's not something I'm particularly proud of.
3) Environmental issues. Call me a tree-hugger if you will, but it makes no sense to just waste a resource which is finite. Especially when that resource costs $115/barrel.
4) We have a contract. And I will fight to my last breath to defend every word in it against the onslaught of attempts to undermind it. Unfortunately, I'm sure there will be a time to express my displeasure with the fact that we DON'T have a contract through operating EXTREMELY safely, but now is not that time.
5) I've flown with enough FO's who were about to be furloughed, some for the second time, that I know that I hope to God I don't ever have to watch that happen again. If it does happen (and judging by our Q1 results compared to our peers, I'm afraid it will be sooner rather than later as we implode) I want to be able to look them in the eye and say that I have tried hard to do whatever I could to keep them in their seat. ****ing money out the tailpipe for the sake of telling Jeff (who isn't listening) that you're ****ed simply doesn't accomplish that goal.
6) If this airline goes back into Ch11, or worse yet Ch7, I want to be able to look my family in the eye and know that I did my part to make the company successful. See #5.
7) Professional pride. I hate seeing us suck. It's not my fault, and it's not the pilot group's fault by any means, but I still hate it. I'm not proud of being last in the industry in cost effectiveness for things I CAN CONTROL.
I'm sure nothing that I say is going to change your mind. You'll consider me to be a Marvin, and that's fine. You'll accuse me of drinking the KoolAid and that's fine too. I don't answer to you. I don't have my head in the sand. I haven't forgotten the past. And I completely understand why we are where we are. And I still have decided that the best thing for me, my crew, my family, and my fellow pilot group at this point is to operate the airplane efficiently when it makes sense to do so.
04-25-2014, 03:11 PM
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 424
All the fuel that I have ever been able to save by asking for optimum altitude, routings, flying planned speed, or single engine taxiing has been burned waiting for gates (and more).
Until some management level changes happen I'm afraid it will just be professionalism and pride that motivate our behavior.
Also, at this airline I have never flown with anyone who intentionally wasted fuel. On time comes before efficient
Until some management level changes happen I'm afraid it will just be professionalism and pride that motivate our behavior.
Also, at this airline I have never flown with anyone who intentionally wasted fuel. On time comes before efficient
04-25-2014, 05:09 PM
#53
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
BusJock,
You seem to be very passionate about this. Understood. And far be it from me to tell you how to run your jet. That's between you, your FO, and your employer.
Like you, I've been through the misery that has become of United Airlines due to bad leadership following bad leadership. It seems now we have actually gotten WORSE leadership... something I thought was impossible. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a pilot that doesn't agree with you that Jeff and his band of Yessir's has to go. Hopefully Wall Street and more importantly the board will agree soon. The clock is ticking, and one needs to look no further than our Q1 results vs. the rest of the industry.
I must not have done a good job of explaining my philosophy if you think that I am suggesting for one second that the pilot group is to blame for our woes. A chimpanzee can figure out that the financial and operational failures of UAL rest exactly where they should... Willis Tower. It would be funny to list their failures if it wasn't so directly affecting my life and my future. But at the end of the day, the result is that if we fail, you and I are left out in the dirt looking for a new job at the bottom of some other list, and Jeff will walk with his millions. Sucks, but that's a fact. So it's in my best interest to see this company succeed, in spite of Jeff.
Here is where you and I disagree. You understandably see this FE training as a total waste of time. After all, if management is going to squander all our $$ through shares, CMS, FAR117, etc. etc. etc., why should you go out of your way to make ANY effort to save gas? How many times have you gotten to the arrival station and waited 20 minutes for a gate, thus ****ing away all the fuel you would have saved? How many times have you sat there with the APU running waiting for them to plug in ground power so you can shut down? Again, it would be funny how we continue to fail if it weren't so important to our lives that United succeed. Why should you try if all your efforts are thwarted by a management team hell bent on stealing every dollar from you and violating every section of the contract that they agreed to? It's very understandable that you give Jeff the middle finger as you plow across the country at Mach .81, APU on at FL260. I choose to do things differently, and here's why. If you don't care, you certainly don't need to read, as your approval isn't important to me.
1) The A320 fleet was slated to be retired starting in 2015. Then there was a decision to stretch that out to 2020 if they could improve the economics... mainly reliability and efficiency. The reliability has improved with a $40 million some odd investment. The efficiency is really up to us. I'm now hearing that there is talk that the fleet could be stretched to 2025 if the metrics work. Personally, I have no interest in flying the 737 again. So it behooves me to keep the A320 around as LONG as possible. If that means being efficient to sway the case towards making it viable to 2025, I'm on board.
2) We SE taxi around 3% of the time. Delta SE taxi's around 79% of the time. We are last in SE taxi. Why is that? I know on the A320 with the weirdness of the power transfer it can be construed as a safety issue. But Delta flies the A320 and I can't remember a single incident or accident attributable to SE taxi at their airline. Not saying there aren't any.... I just haven't heard of them. Like it or not; for reasons intentional or unintentional, we are at the bottom of fuel efficiency in the industry on our specific fleet, and as an airline in general. That's not something I'm particularly proud of.
3) Environmental issues. Call me a tree-hugger if you will, but it makes no sense to just waste a resource which is finite. Especially when that resource costs $115/barrel.
4) We have a contract. And I will fight to my last breath to defend every word in it against the onslaught of attempts to undermind it. Unfortunately, I'm sure there will be a time to express my displeasure with the fact that we DON'T have a contract through operating EXTREMELY safely, but now is not that time.
5) I've flown with enough FO's who were about to be furloughed, some for the second time, that I know that I hope to God I don't ever have to watch that happen again. If it does happen (and judging by our Q1 results compared to our peers, I'm afraid it will be sooner rather than later as we implode) I want to be able to look them in the eye and say that I have tried hard to do whatever I could to keep them in their seat. ****ing money out the tailpipe for the sake of telling Jeff (who isn't listening) that you're ****ed simply doesn't accomplish that goal.
6) If this airline goes back into Ch11, or worse yet Ch7, I want to be able to look my family in the eye and know that I did my part to make the company successful. See #5.
7) Professional pride. I hate seeing us suck. It's not my fault, and it's not the pilot group's fault by any means, but I still hate it. I'm not proud of being last in the industry in cost effectiveness for things I CAN CONTROL.
I'm sure nothing that I say is going to change your mind. You'll consider me to be a Marvin, and that's fine. You'll accuse me of drinking the KoolAid and that's fine too. I don't answer to you. I don't have my head in the sand. I haven't forgotten the past. And I completely understand why we are where we are. And I still have decided that the best thing for me, my crew, my family, and my fellow pilot group at this point is to operate the airplane efficiently when it makes sense to do so.
I've clearly said more about this subject than anyone cares to read, so I'll sign off of this thread now. Best of luck to us all. And I don't blame you for not taking Fuel Efficiency seriously.
You seem to be very passionate about this. Understood. And far be it from me to tell you how to run your jet. That's between you, your FO, and your employer.
Like you, I've been through the misery that has become of United Airlines due to bad leadership following bad leadership. It seems now we have actually gotten WORSE leadership... something I thought was impossible. I think you'd be hard pressed to find a pilot that doesn't agree with you that Jeff and his band of Yessir's has to go. Hopefully Wall Street and more importantly the board will agree soon. The clock is ticking, and one needs to look no further than our Q1 results vs. the rest of the industry.
I must not have done a good job of explaining my philosophy if you think that I am suggesting for one second that the pilot group is to blame for our woes. A chimpanzee can figure out that the financial and operational failures of UAL rest exactly where they should... Willis Tower. It would be funny to list their failures if it wasn't so directly affecting my life and my future. But at the end of the day, the result is that if we fail, you and I are left out in the dirt looking for a new job at the bottom of some other list, and Jeff will walk with his millions. Sucks, but that's a fact. So it's in my best interest to see this company succeed, in spite of Jeff.
Here is where you and I disagree. You understandably see this FE training as a total waste of time. After all, if management is going to squander all our $$ through shares, CMS, FAR117, etc. etc. etc., why should you go out of your way to make ANY effort to save gas? How many times have you gotten to the arrival station and waited 20 minutes for a gate, thus ****ing away all the fuel you would have saved? How many times have you sat there with the APU running waiting for them to plug in ground power so you can shut down? Again, it would be funny how we continue to fail if it weren't so important to our lives that United succeed. Why should you try if all your efforts are thwarted by a management team hell bent on stealing every dollar from you and violating every section of the contract that they agreed to? It's very understandable that you give Jeff the middle finger as you plow across the country at Mach .81, APU on at FL260. I choose to do things differently, and here's why. If you don't care, you certainly don't need to read, as your approval isn't important to me.
1) The A320 fleet was slated to be retired starting in 2015. Then there was a decision to stretch that out to 2020 if they could improve the economics... mainly reliability and efficiency. The reliability has improved with a $40 million some odd investment. The efficiency is really up to us. I'm now hearing that there is talk that the fleet could be stretched to 2025 if the metrics work. Personally, I have no interest in flying the 737 again. So it behooves me to keep the A320 around as LONG as possible. If that means being efficient to sway the case towards making it viable to 2025, I'm on board.
2) We SE taxi around 3% of the time. Delta SE taxi's around 79% of the time. We are last in SE taxi. Why is that? I know on the A320 with the weirdness of the power transfer it can be construed as a safety issue. But Delta flies the A320 and I can't remember a single incident or accident attributable to SE taxi at their airline. Not saying there aren't any.... I just haven't heard of them. Like it or not; for reasons intentional or unintentional, we are at the bottom of fuel efficiency in the industry on our specific fleet, and as an airline in general. That's not something I'm particularly proud of.
3) Environmental issues. Call me a tree-hugger if you will, but it makes no sense to just waste a resource which is finite. Especially when that resource costs $115/barrel.
4) We have a contract. And I will fight to my last breath to defend every word in it against the onslaught of attempts to undermind it. Unfortunately, I'm sure there will be a time to express my displeasure with the fact that we DON'T have a contract through operating EXTREMELY safely, but now is not that time.
5) I've flown with enough FO's who were about to be furloughed, some for the second time, that I know that I hope to God I don't ever have to watch that happen again. If it does happen (and judging by our Q1 results compared to our peers, I'm afraid it will be sooner rather than later as we implode) I want to be able to look them in the eye and say that I have tried hard to do whatever I could to keep them in their seat. ****ing money out the tailpipe for the sake of telling Jeff (who isn't listening) that you're ****ed simply doesn't accomplish that goal.
6) If this airline goes back into Ch11, or worse yet Ch7, I want to be able to look my family in the eye and know that I did my part to make the company successful. See #5.
7) Professional pride. I hate seeing us suck. It's not my fault, and it's not the pilot group's fault by any means, but I still hate it. I'm not proud of being last in the industry in cost effectiveness for things I CAN CONTROL.
I'm sure nothing that I say is going to change your mind. You'll consider me to be a Marvin, and that's fine. You'll accuse me of drinking the KoolAid and that's fine too. I don't answer to you. I don't have my head in the sand. I haven't forgotten the past. And I completely understand why we are where we are. And I still have decided that the best thing for me, my crew, my family, and my fellow pilot group at this point is to operate the airplane efficiently when it makes sense to do so.
I've clearly said more about this subject than anyone cares to read, so I'll sign off of this thread now. Best of luck to us all. And I don't blame you for not taking Fuel Efficiency seriously.
04-25-2014, 07:20 PM
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
They were lucky not to get an aircraft off the end of the runway with the last "reversers as required" initiative, and the FOQA data scared them into rescinding it. Now here we go again. Let's hope they remain lucky long enough to rescind this again. Morons.
04-26-2014, 01:38 AM
#55
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Romeo.
You haven't been around long enough. We have had the exact same fuel savings program every 4-6 years for our entire careers. We don't need it, the problem is we have another new generation of MBA's who haven't heard of it before.
Shouldn't be long now before we try something completely different -
an airline within an airline! Low cost!
What will we call it this time? Jeffy?
You haven't been around long enough. We have had the exact same fuel savings program every 4-6 years for our entire careers. We don't need it, the problem is we have another new generation of MBA's who haven't heard of it before.
Shouldn't be long now before we try something completely different -
an airline within an airline! Low cost!
What will we call it this time? Jeffy?
04-26-2014, 03:10 AM
#56
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Originally Posted by RomeoJulietLima
Seriously, you are using the terms of a juvenile
Well, dude! Here are some other terms really! Can we really do that!
Omg! Let's keep it real! Are there other jobs out there? Do, I really have to get a college degree! Really dude! I mean really, why do I have to work so hard! Omg, this is so ....... Hard! I mean really dude! Take a chill pill! Oh my god! You guys are so critical in the pilot business! Fine whatever!
This is so hard!
Yeah, this pilot business is hard so suck it up!
You guys complain about every little last "thing" hold on, do I mean crap! yeah I do! Oh should I have to be PC of course, I have to be because everyone here is so delicate! You know what? Yeah being a pilot means making sacrifices, but you know up so does any profession,
So suck it up!
You guys complain so much! You know what I walked with a great doctor today on a trail here in ANC, I didn't care what he does in his personal life. It was just my pleasure to say hi to him!
You know being a pilot takes training, hell of a lot of training. So don't take it for granted, because many "men" went before you boys!
Enjoy!
Rjl
Well, dude! Here are some other terms really! Can we really do that!
Omg! Let's keep it real! Are there other jobs out there? Do, I really have to get a college degree! Really dude! I mean really, why do I have to work so hard! Omg, this is so ....... Hard! I mean really dude! Take a chill pill! Oh my god! You guys are so critical in the pilot business! Fine whatever!
This is so hard!
Yeah, this pilot business is hard so suck it up!
You guys complain about every little last "thing" hold on, do I mean crap! yeah I do! Oh should I have to be PC of course, I have to be because everyone here is so delicate! You know what? Yeah being a pilot means making sacrifices, but you know up so does any profession,
So suck it up!
You guys complain so much! You know what I walked with a great doctor today on a trail here in ANC, I didn't care what he does in his personal life. It was just my pleasure to say hi to him!
You know being a pilot takes training, hell of a lot of training. So don't take it for granted, because many "men" went before you boys!
Enjoy!
Rjl
Well "dude" what is your story? You are not even a pilot. From the living AK thread;
You might thing I marketing the base, but I am a microbiologist! Still love it! I don't have deal in this game!
So a couple of obvious things here.
1. This and previous corporate sponsored non researched unworkable corporate fuel policy crop doesn't work, isn't usable from a safety or operational standpoint, is dangerous at it's worst and just plain idiotic at it's best. And obviously as a microbiologist you wouldn't know that and have no place here or anywhere expounding an opinion about it...
2. I have lots o doctor friends. They have plenty of negative to say about the medical industry. The difference is there aren't many open forums where you can go see it in the medical community. Come to think of it APC is about pilots and aviation issues it's not called MPC and it's not about microbiologists last time I checked. So why don't you stick to microbiology, we'll handle the airplane stuff....
3. You really have nothing to ad on this site. Yet you seem to have tried to make yourself into a self appointed morality, attitude and conversation monitor. This isn't the first member or the first thread into which you have felt the need to interject your opinion on what other peoples attitudes and or views should be.
4. It's getting old, CHILL!! Go ride your bike, or climb a mountain, or rub a grizzly bears belly or something. But your trash talk is not needed, wanted or appreciated here. Thanks for your consideration.
04-26-2014, 03:31 AM
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Originally Posted by Airhoss
RJL,
Well "dude" what is your story? You are not even a pilot. From the living AK thread; ...But you come on here throwing out advice on an airline specific thread about an airline specific policy of which you HAVE NO IDEA what you are speaking of?
So a couple of obvious things here.
1. This and previous corporate sponsored non researched unworkable corporate fuel policy crop doesn't work, isn't usable from a safety or operational standpoint, is dangerous at it's worst and just plain idiotic at it's best. And obviously as a microbiologist you wouldn't know that and have no place here or anywhere expounding an opinion about it...
2. I have lots o doctor friends. They have plenty of negative to say about the medical industry. The difference is there aren't many open forums where you can go see it in the medical community. Come to think of it APC is about pilots and aviation issues it's not called MPC and it's not about microbiologists last time I checked. So why don't you stick to microbiology, we'll handle the airplane stuff....
3. You really have nothing to ad on this site. Yet you seem to have tried to make yourself into a self appointed morality, attitude and conversation monitor. This isn't the first member or the first thread into which you have felt the need to interject your opinion on what other peoples attitudes and or views should be.
4. It's getting old, CHILL!! Go ride your bike, or climb a mountain, or rub a grizzly bears belly or something. But your trash talk is not needed, wanted or appreciated here. Thanks for your consideration.
Well "dude" what is your story? You are not even a pilot. From the living AK thread; ...But you come on here throwing out advice on an airline specific thread about an airline specific policy of which you HAVE NO IDEA what you are speaking of?
So a couple of obvious things here.
1. This and previous corporate sponsored non researched unworkable corporate fuel policy crop doesn't work, isn't usable from a safety or operational standpoint, is dangerous at it's worst and just plain idiotic at it's best. And obviously as a microbiologist you wouldn't know that and have no place here or anywhere expounding an opinion about it...
2. I have lots o doctor friends. They have plenty of negative to say about the medical industry. The difference is there aren't many open forums where you can go see it in the medical community. Come to think of it APC is about pilots and aviation issues it's not called MPC and it's not about microbiologists last time I checked. So why don't you stick to microbiology, we'll handle the airplane stuff....
3. You really have nothing to ad on this site. Yet you seem to have tried to make yourself into a self appointed morality, attitude and conversation monitor. This isn't the first member or the first thread into which you have felt the need to interject your opinion on what other peoples attitudes and or views should be.
4. It's getting old, CHILL!! Go ride your bike, or climb a mountain, or rub a grizzly bears belly or something. But your trash talk is not needed, wanted or appreciated here. Thanks for your consideration.
04-26-2014, 05:25 AM
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,083
Originally Posted by Probe
Romeo.
You haven't been around long enough. We have had the exact same fuel savings program every 4-6 years for our entire careers. We don't need it, the problem is we have another new generation of MBA's who haven't heard of it before.
Shouldn't be long now before we try something completely different -
an airline within an airline! Low cost!
What will we call it this time? Jeffy?
You haven't been around long enough. We have had the exact same fuel savings program every 4-6 years for our entire careers. We don't need it, the problem is we have another new generation of MBA's who haven't heard of it before.
Shouldn't be long now before we try something completely different -
an airline within an airline! Low cost!
What will we call it this time? Jeffy?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
