Search

Notices

Sparky Demo Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2014 | 05:21 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
That's a pretty all-encompassing list!!
But not totally. T-34 "Turbo Weenie", A-7 was also known as the "Sewer Pipe" and "Ensign Killer" (though both were less common than SLUF) and the S-3 was the "Hoover" or "War Hoover."
Reply
Old 07-18-2014 | 05:29 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by oldmako
Yes, it must be an infantile UAL thing. Just for your edification here are a few more.......
The difference is UAL uses names not heard outside UAL. Trying too hard to be cool isn't cool (Bigfoot... really?). Of all people, the Godfather should know that. Oh yeah, I forgot... at CAL the WB crews often referred to 737s as "Speed Bumps" because of the .74ish cruise speed of the "Classics."
Reply
Old 07-18-2014 | 07:32 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker
The difference is UAL uses names not heard outside UAL. Trying too hard to be cool isn't cool
It part of the culture and tradition which there is a concerted effort to remove that culture and replace it with a different one. Forcing L-CAL naming conventions (Like calling Flight Operations the "Chief Pilots Office" etc) is just one way to force a culture change. In the Navy in the 80s the CNO tried to change the name of the BOQ to the UOPH (Unaccompanied Officer Personnel Housing) because of the larger number of women officers but it failed because everyone refuse to call it UOPH and they still called it the BOQ. The next CNO reversed the name change.

It has nothing to do with trying to "sound cool". Naming aircraft is part of the tradition of aviation.
Reply
Old 07-18-2014 | 08:11 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
It part of the culture and tradition which there is a concerted effort to remove that culture and replace it with a different one. Forcing L-CAL naming conventions (Like calling Flight Operations the "Chief Pilots Office" etc) is just one way to force a culture change. In the Navy in the 80s the CNO tried to change the name of the BOQ to the UOPH (Unaccompanied Officer Personnel Housing) because of the larger number of women officers but it failed because everyone refuse to call it UOPH and they still called it the BOQ. The next CNO reversed the name change.

It has nothing to do with trying to "sound cool". Naming aircraft is part of the tradition of aviation.
Lol, did ya notice how on the other board u were taken to the woodshed for your moaning about the 'Chief Pilots Office' conspiracy? Nobody is forcing anything on you. But in your world were all out to get you. Call it whatever the heck you want, I just wanna fly my trip and go home.
Reply
Old 07-18-2014 | 08:42 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
Lol, did ya notice how on the other board u were taken to the woodshed for your moaning about the 'Chief Pilots Office' conspiracy? Nobody is forcing anything on you. But in your world were all out to get you. Call it whatever the heck you want, I just wanna fly my trip and go home.
+1.

Who cares. I call a 737 a "737" and a 747 a "747". Yes I know, crazy right? If you want to play your reindeer games of Fifi and Guppy and Sparky that's fine...I'll roll my eyes, smile, and tell ya I'll meet you at the jet. I really just want to have an enjoyable trip and get the F home. This is a job, nothing more, nothing less. I enjoy the job but it's a job - and certainly doesn't define me or my character.
Reply
Old 07-19-2014 | 11:08 PM
  #16  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Sparky is quite possibly the best nickname I've heard for an airliner in a long time.

The thing was/is prone to battery fires- of course it needs a dark nickname for its' tendencies!
Reply
Old 07-20-2014 | 04:39 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Default

Originally Posted by MotorCity22
What is up with all this infantile baby talk over at UAL ?

Guppy, Bunky and now Sparky... You want a Binky to go with that ?

/>
Yeah, but we say em with a really deep voice.
Reply
Old 07-20-2014 | 07:16 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Aspiring FO
Default

Originally Posted by MotorCity22
...infantile baby talk...
And what is up with the redundancy? It's so redundant.
Reply
Old 07-20-2014 | 07:29 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Default

I remember hearing the names Whale and Guppy when I was a kid in the 80s and early 90s. Now it seems like it's mostly UAL guys that use these terms. Was it an old school united thing to name planes after fish? Just curious.
Reply
Old 07-20-2014 | 08:02 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: 75/76 Right
Default

The 747-100/200 (aka - the whale or the classic) was actually called "the rope start" here at united. That one makes me laugh.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MX727
Cargo
220
06-26-2013 11:17 AM
Cubdriver
Hiring News
0
02-05-2013 08:00 AM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices