![]() |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1857411)
I find it hard to believe that you would be forced to leave the IAH base. If you have been based there since 1996 you can easily hold Airbus Captain, 777 FO or 787 FO. Lots of DEN pilots were forced to move to different seats to stay in the same base.
You can too. No one is forcing you to move out of base. Oh, I am not worried about that at all. I was just empathizing with anyone who may be forced out of their domicile that is raising a family and I was using my situation as an example. I can't leave Houston and likely won't until I am close to retirement and am looking for something with all four seasons and little to no snow. Holding out hope for the Destin Florida base............ Ready to pull the kids out of school at a moments notice for that. |
Originally Posted by Kilder
(Post 1858856)
Yes Andy Houston is doing bad...you might wanna call Forbes and tell them
Houston named America's No. 1 city by national mag: Oil bust no matter - CultureMap Houston and while you're at it advise Siemens against this move..what are they thinking don't they realize that Houston is in a depression as per the knowledgeable expertise of Andy from APC... Siemens announces expansion in Houston | News - Home Face it...Houston is not losing any flying...IAH is losing 737 flying to other bases...other bases will fly the routes that were part of the IAH flying...period. The hot shots that were shorting Houston Residential and commercial construction lost some money. Construction and home sales are doing very well despite some contraction in energy sectors. We may have a third negative quarter, but since this is both a beta and a gamma city it has allot of redundancies and over-lapping of economic sectors that protect it in such times. Very unique city. Probably one of 7 in the USA in my opinion that could withstand some of the other negative factors and still come out in a favorable economy. The Tax base is still very strong. |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 1859038)
Oh, I am not worried about that at all. I was just empathizing with anyone who may be forced out of their domicile that is raising a family and I was using my situation as an example. I can't leave Houston and likely won't until I am close to retirement and am looking for something with all four seasons and little to no snow. Holding out hope for the Destin Florida base............ Ready to pull the kids out of school at a moments notice for that.
|
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 1859415)
Getting bumped sucks. Badly. I think the reason Kilder is getting some flak is that the LUAL side has been enduring this "base shuffling" since day 1 of the merger. We've had bumps from ORD, LAX, DEN, shifting flying out of SFO, and the complete closure of SEA. That's a lot of lives that were effected. Not much was said except a few gems about LUAL being lucky to still being in business. Now that there is some shifting in a LCAL base its a travesty and unjustified. This reeks of self centeredness. The pain that each of the LUAL pilots displaced from their domicile was just as great as it's going to be for the LCAL pilots out of IAH. I personally wouldn't wish it for anyone, and definitely hope that folks in IAH find a soft landing
Scott |
Originally Posted by Scott Stoops
(Post 1859473)
. For Ben to act as if the company is somehow favoring the LUAL side of the ship is comical at best. It just happens that it finally affected him - Ben that is. Oh, boo freaking hoo.
Scott Honestly; just speculation not trying to ignite anything. |
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 1859415)
I personally wouldn't wish it for anyone, and definitely hope that folks in IAH find a soft landing
Right. I don't know what it costs these days, but in 1996 it cost over 10K to move my family. If management wants to displace pilots it will be very expensive. I wonder three things really: 1. Does the company have the cash to move the pilots? 2. Whose budget does it come out of? Who accounts for it? 3. Was this in any of the financial plans published so far (another words was it previously planned for and budgeted?) |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 1859747)
Right.
I don't know what it costs these days, but in 1996 it cost over 10K to move my family. If management wants to displace pilots it will be very expensive. I wonder three things really: 1. Does the company have the cash to move the pilots? 2. Whose budget does it come out of? Who accounts for it? 3. Was this in any of the financial plans published so far (another words was it previously planned for and budgeted?) Also, what's the cost (for just one month) to have a Captain in a base that they don't need, let alone 150 of them. At $14,000 a month it makes sense to displace. Plus the company knows all the pilots who get bumped won't leave the base. They know many will just move to other positions, so there isn't really a big cost. Plus others won't move, they'll just commute until they can get back in base. None of us hope to see anyone leave the base. But this is the reality of the merger. The LUAL guys are now running manpower planning and most of them have been here 20+ years, and this is how they did things in the past. They have more pilots and more bases to play with, and they are going to optimize it as much as possible. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1860208)
The LUAL guys are now running manpower planning and most of them have been here 20+ years, and this is how they did things in the past. They have more pilots and more bases to play with, and they are going to optimize it as much as possible.
|
Originally Posted by sleeves
(Post 1860681)
I think ol' Herve is LCAL.
|
Don't know who VC and DK are but Ben and Mike are very clearly directing their ire at Herve. And yes Herve is LCAL and commutes from IAH to Chicago.
Really it matters not who is LCAL or LUAL here. The bottom line is making a profit. Herve wants to make money. He has already reduced short calls for reserves. What is not being mentioned in all this is that the rumor on the street is the A320 will go to 300 crews in IAH. There will be little to no net loss of CA positions in IAH. Dogg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands