Search
Notices

OET class...Surprised.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2015, 05:40 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Sorry to inform you Dave, there were changes made and presented at the OET. I guess you weren't listening.

The in and out 0 is new.
The CI standard is new.
The idea to spend time and discuss joint/crew flight plan meeting as best practice is new to many and officially sanctioned now by top.
The explanation of the new ground equipment plan is new
To a lot of pilots the ACF is new.
The standard fuel policy is new to many dispatchers and pilots.
The combination of both former pilot groups is a first.

Dave you just want to complain about what you have no control over.

This thread is about OET and it's ok to not like it but all that other stuff belongs on another thread.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 06:35 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

Hey Greg Bockleman, consider this link. I don't base an investment or personal cockpit policy on something a Saudi prince says, but he seems pretty adamant...then again he hedges saying, "If supply stays where it is."

Good news for gas prices: Saudi prince says oil will 'never' cost $100 a barrel again | syracuse.com
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 08:03 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Bligh View Post
Hey Greg Bockleman, consider this link. I don't base an investment or personal cockpit policy on something a Saudi prince says, but he seems pretty adamant...then again he hedges saying, "If supply stays where it is."

Good news for gas prices: Saudi prince says oil will 'never' cost $100 a barrel again | syracuse.com
Did he also say there would be no displacements?
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 09:05 AM
  #114  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Guppy - DEN
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Kilder View Post
Continental was innovative in its use of its fleet (757 to Europe, 737 to Hawaii....)
Thanks for sharing this bit of info. I always wonder who the brain child of this strategy was.

My last DH to the islands left many blocked [empty] seats, many bags, and many full fare folks who were left behind to accommodate the 30,000 foot crossing, APU burning the whole way, crappy ride in the guppy.
Duck is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 10:27 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by Duck View Post
My last DH to the islands left many blocked [empty] seats, many bags, and many full fare folks who were left behind to accommodate the 30,000 foot crossing, APU burning the whole way, crappy ride in the guppy.
Just wait for "APU On Demand" on the New Guppy.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 01-16-2015, 09:32 PM
  #116  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
Default

Originally Posted by ron kent View Post
It doesn't matter what we do to save a few hundred lbs of fuel each flight. I would estimate that I burn an extra 500-700 lbs each flight waiting to get parked because the ramp is under manned...management solution? Lay off more rampers.
For those of us who have been here 15-30+ years, we have been hearing them tell us to save gas the whole time. We do. We have also been waiting for a gate in the penalty box, or 50 yards short due to no jetway driver, for the same number of years.

They want to apply process improvement to "us", but they don't do it to their own decision making and the repercussions from those same decisions.

At the end of the day we get to see the same movie every 5-8 years. I have most of the words memorized by now.
Probe is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 12:15 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy View Post
Sorry to inform you Dave, there were changes made and presented at the OET. I guess you weren't listening.

The in and out 0 is new.
The CI standard is new.
The idea to spend time and discuss joint/crew flight plan meeting as best practice is new to many and officially sanctioned now by top.
The explanation of the new ground equipment plan is new
To a lot of pilots the ACF is new.
The standard fuel policy is new to many dispatchers and pilots.
The combination of both former pilot groups is a first.

Dave you just want to complain about what you have no control over.

This thread is about OET and it's ok to not like it but all that other stuff belongs on another thread.
I hate to say it, but no, none of this is new. If you pay attention to FOM summary of changes, FM changes, and bulletins, all this stuff was already there, maybe recently, but there---or we used to do it long ago, and is now rediscovered.....what's old is new again.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 08:59 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Dave are you from the sUAL side?

If so you are what makes it rough for us other sUAL exs. You have to argue everything and be right. The truth is this class and the data is new to many and many don't peruse the change dates on the FOM like you do.

It, the class, is there to reinforce what has happened.
And for your info the standard CI began on the same date as the first OET class, the ACF has been in the FOM since the merger, but the other side didn't use it until SABRE, the standard fuel policy was not used until SABRE and even then it was not being used by most of the sCAL dispatchers until they attended this course.

Dude be a help and not a complainer.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 09:02 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Oh and Dave I've been at good old United for over three decades and very little is "new" to me and yet I found the class worth the five hours pay and a sandwich. It was a good way for both exs to consolidate as the new United.

Learn a new tune, if you can harmonize.
Regularguy is offline  
Old 01-17-2015, 10:34 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 646
Default

Originally Posted by Duck View Post
Thanks for sharing this bit of info. I always wonder who the brain child of this strategy was.

My last DH to the islands left many blocked [empty] seats, many bags, and many full fare folks who were left behind to accommodate the 30,000 foot crossing, APU burning the whole way, crappy ride in the guppy.
CAL wasn't the pioneer in using the 757 transatlantic. They just built it to a scale that hadn't been done before, due to the EWR hub and not having enough widebodies in their fleet. The used what the had available.

The European carriers were doing it years before CAL's first flight in 1995. American did JFK-MAN on a 757 in 1995 too.


Airliners.net forum: 757 Transatlantic History
C11DCA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
olly
Cargo
9
10-16-2012 04:11 PM
b11fedex
Cargo
30
08-21-2012 06:32 PM
KC10 FATboy
Major
29
04-18-2008 07:17 AM
Ray Blaszak
Technical
5
04-17-2008 07:14 PM
Illini
Flight Schools and Training
3
11-06-2006 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices