![]() |
It's hard to tell with constantly changing seniority numbers, but the bottom hire on the merged list is #11055 or so, for the purposes of the snapshot.
There would have to be openings below that for an LUA to get the 787. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1925223)
No this is not true. NONE of the LUAL pilots 787 FO bids were looked at. Once it went unfilled by pre-merger CAL pilots, they just kept going down the list awarding it to post-merger hires.
I've already spoken with Manpower Planning. They admitted they made a mistake. It will be fixed on today's snapshot. LUAL pilots on the 787. Its real. |
Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
(Post 1925309)
It's hard to tell with constantly changing seniority numbers, but the bottom hire on the merged list is #11055 or so, for the purposes of the snapshot.
There would have to be openings below that for an LUA to get the 787. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1925402)
There were openings below that. 11 in SFO alone. Those pilots are post-merger hires. It was a mistake on the snapshot.
|
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought that LUAL Pilots were fenced off until #25 got on property. I wasn't aware that there was a contingency built in based off of post-merger hires getting 787.
|
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 1925427)
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought that LUAL Pilots were fenced off until #25 got on property. I wasn't aware that there was a contingency built in based off of post-merger hires getting 787.
It doesn't "drop the fence" it just allows the remaining slots on a particular bid to go to the other side for those vacancies. Since everyone hired after the SLI wasn't S-anything, it doesn't really apply other than in seniority order. In Nov/Dec when we get number 25 all fleets/seats are system-wide seniority awards. What's going to be interesting is how it's handled for bids that have an effective date after the sheduled delivery of number 25 but closes before it's actually on property. |
Answered in prior post.
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 1925431)
The ISL award only applied to the pilots on property then. If a vacancy goes unfilled with pilots from the respective side (sUAL for the 747 or sCAL for the 787) the remaining vacancies for that bid can go to anyone in seniority order.
It doesn't "drop the fence" it just allows the remaining slots on a particular bid to go to the other side for those vacancies. Since everyone hired after the SLI wasn't S-anything, it doesn't really apply other than in seniority order. In Nov/Dec when we get number 25 all fleets/seats are system-wide seniority awards. What's going to be interesting is how it's handled for bids that have an effective date after the sheduled delivery of number 25 but closes before it's actually on property. The language in the Award is straightforward as I read it. It uses the term "can be awarded" and "delivered". It doesn't say anything about effective date. So it looks like #25 has to be "delivered" before a vacancy "can be awarded". So in theory, there could be a bid that closes the day before #25 arrives and no LUAL pilots will be awarded a vacancy, unless of course it goes unfilled on the LCAL list, like it appears might happen on this bid. |
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1925442)
Great explanation. Yes LUAL pilots can fly the 787 before the fence falls, but only after it goes unfilled by LCAL pilots not bidding it.
The language in the Award is straightforward as I read it. It uses the term "can be awarded" and "delivered". It doesn't say anything about effective date. So it looks like #25 has to be "delivered" before a vacancy "can be awarded". So in theory, there could be a bid that closes the day before #25 arrives and no LUAL pilots will be awarded a vacancy, unless of course it goes unfilled on the LCAL list, like it appears might happen on this bid. It's spelled right there in the bid. VACANCY AWARD Snapshot EFFECTIVE 9/29/2015 (October Bid Month) Vacancy Award is Effective for October. If the bid says the Award is Effective for December and number 25 comes in November. The ISL doesn't say date published. It says awarded. If an award isn't effective until after 25 arrives, it should be open to all. Just saying it's going to be interesting. |
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 1925468)
I was just going by how some interpret "can be awarded". The award has an effective date. I know many who feel that "awarded" is the effective date since it's published as such. I can see their point that if the award is for a date after number 25 is on property, why were they not allowed to bid it? Already been discussed in length on the ALPA board.
It's spelled right there in the bid. VACANCY AWARD Snapshot EFFECTIVE 9/29/2015 (October Bid Month) Vacancy Award is Effective for October. If the bid says the Award is Effective for December and number 25 comes in November. The ISL doesn't say date published. It says awarded. If an award isn't effective until after 25 arrives, it should be open to all. Just saying it's going to be interesting. |
Can anyone explain in a concise way that's easy for new guy to understand how this "new" 756 bid for SFO/ORD is supposed to work? I read it to mean UA needs 30 more positions on top of what they already have staffed in the 76T at each of those locations...but I guess it's more complicated than that.
More specifically I mean, aren't all the 76T folks just going to be converted to the 756 in general? I guess it has something to do with only 50% can be forced to and the rest need to bid 756 if they want to stay there? IF that's the case, then this vacancy bid could possibly, in effect, have no vacancies at all since 30 current 76T people could just bid over to the 756? And then there would be no back-fills to the 76T since it is "closed." Some 76T folks are showing up on the 756 bid on snap 1. This just seems to skew the numbers and I'm thoroughly confused...which is easy to do I guess. |
Originally Posted by Macdacpilot
(Post 1925523)
Can anyone explain in a concise way that's easy for new guy to understand how this "new" 756 bid for SFO/ORD is supposed to work? I read it to mean UA needs 30 more positions on top of what they already have staffed in the 76T at each of those locations...but I guess it's more complicated than that.
More specifically I mean, aren't all the 76T folks just going to be converted to the 756 in general? I guess it has something to do with only 50% can be forced to and the rest need to bid 756 if they want to stay there? IF that's the case, then this vacancy bid could possibly, in effect, have no vacancies at all since 30 current 76T people could just bid over to the 756? And then there would be no back-fills to the 76T since it is "closed." Some 76T folks are showing up on the 756 bid on snap 1. This just seems to skew the numbers and I'm thoroughly confused...which is easy to do I guess. Another nice thing about it being a new category is that it ignores training freezes so basically anyone can get awarded if their seniority holds it. Hope that helps. |
Argh, Snapshot 2 "posting delayed". Something to do with the 787 stuff discussed I assume?
|
Originally Posted by Macdacpilot
(Post 1925539)
Argh, Snapshot 2 "posting delayed". Something to do with the 787 stuff discussed I assume?
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 1925536)
It's "new" because there is only a 76T base in ORD and SFO. The 76T fleet is going away. All the planes are being converted to "756". They need the lift with those planes so they're starting to staff it. In theory yes all could come from the 76T fleet, but it's an open bid so those awards are strickly by seniority. They won't be backfilling to the 76T no. It's a dead fleet. You can't even bump to it if you're displaced. The more 76T pilots who bid the 756 the less the company needs to involuntarily BAT over later.
Another nice thing about it being a new category is that it ignores training freezes so basically anyone can get awarded if their seniority holds it. Hope that helps. |
Originally Posted by Macdacpilot
(Post 1925546)
Yes, it does, but let me see if I get this then...from the company perspective, it would be better for all the 76T people to bid 756. Is this a correct simplified assumption?
|
Originally Posted by DashTrash
(Post 1925427)
Forgive my ignorance, but I thought that LUAL Pilots were fenced off until #25 got on property. I wasn't aware that there was a contingency built in based off of post-merger hires getting 787.
|
''.........................
|
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1925638)
Can't bid it until the 25th is on the property.
|
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1925638)
Can't bid it until the 25th is on the property.
6. Should there be insufficient bidders from one premerger pilot group for any position in the allocated group of positions under paragraph 5 above, the filling of the position will be governed by the ISL. A pilot thereby awarded a position will, for purposes of processing future displacements under the collective bargaining agreement, be considered as junior to all pilots from the premerger pilot group entitled to the position. Notwithstanding the awarding of positions pursuant to this insufficient bidders provision, the restrictions set out in paragraph 5 above shall continue to apply during the terms specified in paragraph 5 above. |
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1925346)
And since this is APC, a good old conspiracy theory should be tossed. Latest manning summary shows zero change to the plan to shove all future sparkie flying into IAH by mid 2016. So the staffing continues to significantly grow on the West Coast despite no additional flying. Never seen that before. Clearly the number of CAL guys willing to commute to WB reserve is running out. Curious...
Why not just open more vacancies in IAh? Because, long term, they don't plan to run that many 787 routes out of Iah. What you will see is the staffing adjust to the amount of displaced 737 Captains in IAH. Figure another 40 go to 787 FO. Now you have enough crews in Iah to cover an additional 3 routes over what is there today. So, dh SFO crews to IAH and/or create W trips and have them cover the temporary staffing issue. Sometime next year they will open up additional flying in SFO and reduce some of the flying in IAH. When their happens they will not have surplus crews in IAH and SFO will have the staffing to handle the additional flying. |
Originally Posted by CALFO
(Post 1925691)
You need to look at the big picture. We have 13 787 deliveries in less than twelve month. The next 8 are initially (temporarily) going to IAH. On paper, IAH has a lot of 787 pilots. In reality, many are 737 Captains that need to be trained. I doubt the company can train them, plus additional displacements, in time to cover the new IAH flying. Reason being, the system can't afford to lose that many 737 captains overnight. New capt's in other bases must be trained first. So, there will be a lag in training the Iah 787 fo's. The slack will be picked up by SFO and lax. Notice that they are only asking for 5 new 787 IAh Capts on this bid. IAH can't cover the flying.
Why not just open more vacancies in IAh? Because, long term, they don't plan to run that many 787 routes out of Iah. What you will see is the staffing adjust to the amount of displaced 737 Captains in IAH. Figure another 40 go to 787 FO. Now you have enough crews in Iah to cover an additional 3 routes over what is there today. So, dh SFO crews to IAH and/or create W trips and have them cover the temporary staffing issue. Sometime next year they will open up additional flying in SFO and reduce some of the flying in IAH. When their happens they will not have surplus crews in IAH and SFO will have the staffing to handle the additional flying. |
So they are going to gut the IAH 777 flying and replace it with Sparkie then promptly reduce the Sparkie flying all within 12-18 months? I think I see why the phrase "the big picture" invokes eye rolls industry wide.
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1925892)
So they are going to gut the IAH 777 flying and replace it with Sparkie then promptly reduce the Sparkie flying all within 12-18 months? I think I see why the phrase "the big picture" invokes eye rolls industry wide.
|
Any reason why this vacancy is having issues putting out snapshots?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by eagledriver122
(Post 1926457)
Any reason why this vacancy is having issues putting out snapshots?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
A little fencing reason
|
It's out finally. Looks like a fence thing as advertised.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
New snapshot is out and quite a few sUAL 787 FO awards. And LAX went way senior.
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 1926571)
New snapshot is out and quite a few sUAL 787 FO awards. And LAX went way senior.
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1926619)
But who wants to fly with a bunch of filthy scabs?
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 1926571)
New snapshot is out and quite a few sUAL 787 FO awards.
|
Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
(Post 1926675)
If the snaphshot is awarded the way it is now in SFO 4 of the top 6 FOs and 10 of the top 20 FOs will be LUAL pilots.
|
http://www.stephandtonyinvestigate.c...oo-300x199.jpgOne can always operate with a pile of fecal matter and find their prize.
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1926619)
But who wants to fly with a bunch of filthy scabs?
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1926801)
Not me. I ain't pulling gear for those POS mf. But seniority rules baby. And be it 737s or 787s...The UAL boys are gonna take full advantage of this merger. Isn't it great?
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 1926810)
It sure is. And with our increasingly unified pilot group, it will also be great when we are again begging for pennies on the dollar on the retro pay in 2020.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1926840)
why worry about that? GET SOME. Get all you can get while you can get it!
|
good to see 787 opportunities before the 25th aircraft delivery… I'm willing to bet some of the more junior LCAL pilots dropping the 787 bids now that they see way senior LUAL pilots coming on board… as they will constantly get pushed down the G-Line with every new equipment bid from now on…
|
Originally Posted by ugleeual
(Post 1927193)
good to see 787 opportunities before the 25th aircraft delivery… I'm willing to bet some of the more junior LCAL pilots dropping the 787 bids now that they see way senior LUAL pilots coming on board… as they will constantly get pushed down the G-Line with every new equipment bid from now on…
Does the 747 fence stay up then or not? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands