![]() |
Originally Posted by SVA402
(Post 2135547)
Unless they built it as a W trip out of a base that flies the 787 to NRT... I believe SFO does seasonally.
|
Originally Posted by SVA402
(Post 2135547)
Unless they built it as a W trip out of a base that flies the 787 to NRT... I believe SFO does seasonally.
Doubt a 6 day W out of LA would be quite as sought after. Plus sticking DEN-NRT in LA almost guarantees a reduction in IAH and a vacancy in LA. Anyways fwiw early rumbling are manpower planning is saying no reductions planned in IAH. |
In today's FOU Howard says they're looking to give IAH 787 crews one of the SFO trips and getting some 756 SA to avoid displacements. It was pretty easy to see something had to give. With 40 FOs per day sitting reserve and losing 30 lines of flying from LOS that they had one of two choices. I'm glad they chose the forced flying as to not disrupt anymore lives that they have to.
|
The manpower buffoonery continues. Another year or so and we will all be deadheading somewhere to start our trips.
|
What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?
Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it? |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 2136401)
What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?
Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it? |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 2136401)
What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?
Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it? Two big problems: 1) The business traffic flying IAH-LOS is oil industry related 2) Nigeria is experiencing some extreme currency issues and UAL, along with other airlines, has a whole lot of $$$ locked up that the Nigerian government will not permit to be exchanged into dollars. |
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 2136338)
The manpower buffoonery continues. Another year or so and we will all be deadheading somewhere to start our trips.
|
Originally Posted by El10
(Post 2136449)
Not manpower buffoonery, more like network and marketing trying to cut our losses.
|
Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
(Post 2136453)
Exactly.....stop the bleeding
IAH 787 FO has been overmanned since Bid 14-02D which was a Flight Ops creation. Bid 14-02D pilots bid into there after SLI. There should have been a displacement then. Manning decided to first get the IAH 737 manning correct, was met with a flood of Flight Ops tears and backtracked. Manning being gunshy after that episode elected to let IAH 787 FO stay bloated after IAH 737 CA's bumped to the fleet. It got so bad at one point the FO to CA ratio was 4.0. With manning so out of whack instead of bumping 787 FO's some inefficient flying was manufactured for the IAH 787 to have a 787 CA bid to lower the FO to CA ratio. So the company has been paying a couple dozen pilots 200K/year for two and a half years to sit at home rather than nipping the problem in the bud in the first place. Rest easy though IAH 787 FO's on reserve. You can continue your extracurricular activities (well one can't), Flight Operations is too whimpy to try to bump you. Dogg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands