No more LOS
#1
No more LOS.....Now IAH 787 is going to be even more massively overstaffed.
So IAH 756 is overstaffed in both seats. IAH 737 CA is overstaffed and IAH 787 FO is way overstaffed. Going to be interesting to see how they plan to fix this.
So IAH 756 is overstaffed in both seats. IAH 737 CA is overstaffed and IAH 787 FO is way overstaffed. Going to be interesting to see how they plan to fix this.
#2
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
The 787 FO seat is way out of whack after the Guppy displacements. Now I can't see them avoiding a displacement. There are already 40 reserves everyday and that's with Lagos. IAH already has the DEN-NRT forced in. Maybe they could build some W trips.
Going to be interesting in IAH for a while.
#4
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
2 Options IMHO. Displacements or more forced flying.
The 787 FO seat is way out of whack after the Guppy displacements. Now I can't see them avoiding a displacement. There are already 40 reserves everyday and that's with Lagos. IAH already has the DEN-NRT forced in. Maybe they could build some W trips.
Going to be interesting in IAH for a while.
The 787 FO seat is way out of whack after the Guppy displacements. Now I can't see them avoiding a displacement. There are already 40 reserves everyday and that's with Lagos. IAH already has the DEN-NRT forced in. Maybe they could build some W trips.
Going to be interesting in IAH for a while.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
I went to the "reports" tool on the CCS website to look at staffing in various airplanes and seats. Is there a way to sort it by "retirement date."
That may give folks an idea as to when their fleet type and seat may be more properly staffed or with their quality of life will improve.
I think we need more retirements to fix the over-staffing issue. The displacements have caused quite a problem.
That may give folks an idea as to when their fleet type and seat may be more properly staffed or with their quality of life will improve.
I think we need more retirements to fix the over-staffing issue. The displacements have caused quite a problem.
#8
I went to the "reports" tool on the CCS website to look at staffing in various airplanes and seats. Is there a way to sort it by "retirement date."
That may give folks an idea as to when their fleet type and seat may be more properly staffed or with their quality of life will improve.
I think we need more retirements to fix the over-staffing issue. The displacements have caused quite a problem.
That may give folks an idea as to when their fleet type and seat may be more properly staffed or with their quality of life will improve.
I think we need more retirements to fix the over-staffing issue. The displacements have caused quite a problem.
United Seniority
This pilot does some great work in keeping this site up to date. I especially like to see all the "never"s on the Junior Pilot Report that shows when I can (can't) hold a particular seat.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Just some facts that support the idea of no bumps.
1) May crew resources update: "IAH: We expect an increase in staffing of approximately 15 percent on each seat, due to additional flying in this hub. This will allow us to open more captain positions and continue to reduce overstaffing on the first officer seat."
2) IAH maintenance base: They need to keep the aircraft flowing in and out.
3) Training: They can not afford to lose bodies. With the fleet still growing and the training capacity shrinking during the training device relocations to DEN they will be limited on adding new 787 pilots.
4) Asset cost: Poor utilization on our highest costing asset in the enterprise will not happen. They will find a new location to send these airplanes.
1) May crew resources update: "IAH: We expect an increase in staffing of approximately 15 percent on each seat, due to additional flying in this hub. This will allow us to open more captain positions and continue to reduce overstaffing on the first officer seat."
2) IAH maintenance base: They need to keep the aircraft flowing in and out.
3) Training: They can not afford to lose bodies. With the fleet still growing and the training capacity shrinking during the training device relocations to DEN they will be limited on adding new 787 pilots.
4) Asset cost: Poor utilization on our highest costing asset in the enterprise will not happen. They will find a new location to send these airplanes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GovernmentIssue
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-01-2007 04:46 AM



