No more LOS
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 18
DEN makes sense - there was a reason we chose ORD over IAH for the headquarters and DEN over IAH for the dominate training center. Hard to accept - I know, but CLE will wither and IAH will fold as DEN grows as United resumes it's role as dominate carrier there.
Rational thought is going on and OM is being held accountable going forward for the petty games JS played post merger. What say you - OM?
Rational thought is going on and OM is being held accountable going forward for the petty games JS played post merger. What say you - OM?
#42
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
You want to just use population as a criteria when you need to look at the economy of that community. NY, ORD, DC, LA, SFO and DEN have an economy that supports that flying. Take away oil and the per capita income falls quickly. This in and of itself causes United to force passengers through IAH to support the base/hub. This flying can easily be flown out of LAX,ORD,EWR and IAD.
#43
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
"Hard to accept?" I don't really give a ******* where United flies their airplanes as long as they make money doing it- I haven't flown an airplane in or out of IAH in over ten years. The DEN economy pales in comparison to Houston, when the bubble popped in Silicon Valley no one abandoned SFO. Same deal in Houston, no different. The energy sector isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Completely agree about CLE but IAD is also headed for some change, the revamping of the airport fees only prolonged it for a little bit.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 18
I agree IAD is in for change and most of it will come from EWR. EWR can't expand and absorb any IAD flying. Irregardless of cost we'll need a solid gateway to Europe and that is IAD. Would also make a good location for Central and South American flying. With EWR staying about the same as a NY location.
Houston is the fifth largest economy in the US by GDP, it's not gloing anywhere. The NY economy is almost four times that of DC.
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
You want to just use population as a criteria when you need to look at the economy of that community. NY, ORD, DC, LA, SFO and DEN have an economy that supports that flying. Take away oil and the per capita income falls quickly. This in and of itself causes United to force passengers through IAH to support the base/hub. This flying can easily be flown out of LAX,ORD,EWR and IAD.
There are some short term contractions that are going on due to low oil prices, but those effects are being felt around the globe.
One nice thing about Houston is that folks can afford to live here. If your spouse also works, then he/she likely has a decent job. The growth is crazy, even in the middle of the contractions. I see four new major hospitals being built and those only get built when they see people coming here. The city planners try to stay ahead of the population surge for safety's sake. But, it's big money to keep building.
I wasn't big on Houston until I moved here. That being said, I can now understand this place a little better. It has robust and redundant trade due to overlapping economies and sectors. It is an economy of scale and when one portion lags, other portions pick up. From Petroleum, to chemicals, to shipping, to manufacturing, to sci/tech, to engineering, to construction, to medical, to research this city attracts allot of internal and external investment and accompanying growth.
I would like it to slow down a bit. Traffic keeps getting worse on the roads.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,509
Likes: 109
Houston...
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#47
Houston...
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Houston...
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#58 in median family income, #68 in per capita.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High..._United_States
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
I do think Houston has tremendous upside. I would love to see more international lift capacity in IAH. With both DAL and AA in the neighborhood we could use it. I notice Korean, ANA, Lufthansa, Volaris, Air New Zealand, Air China,Copa,Avianca, Ethiad, JAL, Qantas, Ibreria, Aero Mexico, Emirates,West Jet, Hawaiian expanding into the DFW and IAH markets. I guess these other airlines won't concede the market place to AA/DAL/UAL. Must be money there somewhere.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
By that measure, we should open a hub in Anchorage. Look, I've got no dog in the fight, but Houston isn't Cleveland, Denver, or even Dulles in our system. It's our southern gateway and the fifth largest city in the country by both population and economic measures. It's also, unlike LAX and ORD, a place where we don't face competition from AA or DAL.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GovernmentIssue
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-01-2007 04:46 AM



