Search

Notices

No more LOS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2016 | 08:00 AM
  #11  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by SVA402
Unless they built it as a W trip out of a base that flies the 787 to NRT... I believe SFO does seasonally.
I haven't seen it in SFO except for some 1 offs, but LAX flies it year round. It used to do the SIN tag that went away sight the direct route.
Reply
Old 05-26-2016 | 08:15 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SVA402
Unless they built it as a W trip out of a base that flies the 787 to NRT... I believe SFO does seasonally.
SFO doesn't do NRT direct. On DEN-NRT, SFO had 3 seats and LA the other over last fall/winter with no W. Extremely popular move needless to say. That was due to management's past genius decision to put all of last winter's deliveries on IAH-S America stuff.

Doubt a 6 day W out of LA would be quite as sought after. Plus sticking DEN-NRT in LA almost guarantees a reduction in IAH and a vacancy in LA. Anyways fwiw early rumbling are manpower planning is saying no reductions planned in IAH.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 08:06 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

In today's FOU Howard says they're looking to give IAH 787 crews one of the SFO trips and getting some 756 SA to avoid displacements. It was pretty easy to see something had to give. With 40 FOs per day sitting reserve and losing 30 lines of flying from LOS that they had one of two choices. I'm glad they chose the forced flying as to not disrupt anymore lives that they have to.
Reply
Old 05-27-2016 | 08:27 PM
  #14  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

The manpower buffoonery continues. Another year or so and we will all be deadheading somewhere to start our trips.
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 04:36 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 1
Default

What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?

Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it?
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 04:42 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?

Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it?
According to the press, United pulled out of Africa.
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 04:43 AM
  #17  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by baseball
What exactly happened to the Lagos trip?

Did we lose the trip all together, or did another airframe take it?
Gone.

Two big problems:

1) The business traffic flying IAH-LOS is oil industry related

2) Nigeria is experiencing some extreme currency issues and UAL, along with other airlines, has a whole lot of $$$ locked up that the Nigerian government will not permit to be exchanged into dollars.
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 07:01 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
The manpower buffoonery continues. Another year or so and we will all be deadheading somewhere to start our trips.
Not manpower buffoonery, more like network and marketing trying to cut our losses.
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 07:09 AM
  #19  
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by El10
Not manpower buffoonery, more like network and marketing trying to cut our losses.
Exactly.....stop the bleeding
Reply
Old 05-28-2016 | 01:33 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bigfatdaddy
Exactly.....stop the bleeding
Well there is some buffoonery---Flight Operations.

IAH 787 FO has been overmanned since Bid 14-02D which was a Flight Ops creation. Bid 14-02D pilots bid into there after SLI. There should have been a displacement then. Manning decided to first get the IAH 737 manning correct, was met with a flood of Flight Ops tears and backtracked. Manning being gunshy after that episode elected to let IAH 787 FO stay bloated after IAH 737 CA's bumped to the fleet. It got so bad at one point the FO to CA ratio was 4.0. With manning so out of whack instead of bumping 787 FO's some inefficient flying was manufactured for the IAH 787 to have a 787 CA bid to lower the FO to CA ratio.

So the company has been paying a couple dozen pilots 200K/year for two and a half years to sit at home rather than nipping the problem in the bud in the first place.

Rest easy though IAH 787 FO's on reserve. You can continue your extracurricular activities (well one can't), Flight Operations is too whimpy to try to bump you.

Dogg

Last edited by Birddog; 05-28-2016 at 02:18 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
CanoePilot
American
19
06-22-2014 08:43 AM
FlyinPiker
Major
12
12-18-2008 05:34 PM
GovernmentIssue
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-01-2007 04:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices