Originally Posted by skypest (Post 2301477)

My guess that she will never sit in the seat again. It's sad but most likely the reality she is facing. Reflecting on previous precedent at LUA I would guess they company will buy out the rest of her career at book rates and call it a day.

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon (Post 2301591)

I have more of a clue, knowledge and insight than you assume. And further so what about it? The safety aspect alone demands more of our profession and for the company. I don't think a slap on the wrist or a couple of sessions with the shrink is going to fix some very deep emotional problems here. Not even going to speculate on the liability issues that would follow.

I only mentioned the FFD box as a point of fact that will be used and looked at. You're delusional if you think the lawyers won't pounce on that alone.

You have your opinion and I have mine. I don't want her near an airplane ever again.

Originally Posted by Slats Extend (Post 2301603)

You sure don't sound like you have a clue.
I have never said or alluded an opinion on whether or not she should be back in the cockpit again. Nice deflection.

I just calling BS on your blowhards pumping your chests about what she did on the video and trying to apply rational thinking to it.

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon (Post 2301611)

And I call BS to you snowflakes minimizing the severity of the incident and the potential ramifications. There is no other choice to apply rational thinking to her actions. Maybe you're just to dense to grasp that simple fact?

Originally Posted by Slats Extend (Post 2301615)

Nice try Brainsurgeon... lmao

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon (Post 2301611)

And I call BS to you snowflakes minimizing the severity of the incident and the potential ramifications. There is no other choice to apply rational thinking to her actions. Maybe you're just to dense to grasp that simple fact?

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon (Post 2301620)

I figured it was to deep for you and I should've dumbed it down some more.

Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon (Post 2301563)

I also am of the understanding that once a pilot sets foot on airport or company property the EAP and or HIMS option is no longer applicable.

Originally Posted by Lerxst (Post 2301645)

Incorrect.

Originally Posted by Andy (Post 2301622)

While it was a fast moving situation, it ended pretty darned quickly. I'm sure that plane wouldn't have moved an inch; if you look at the video, there's an FA on the flight deck so both the FAs and FO were not going to let the plane move.

I don't claim to know jacksquat about mental illness but I know it would be a PR nightmare if she were to fly for a commercial carrier in the future. Not going to happen. Just like the JetBlue pilot.