Search

Notices

A350F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2021 | 03:58 PM
  #11  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.
Yes, but how far can it go with that load? Will it need a tech stop in KIX when flying from HKG/SZX to ANC? I haven’t seen those numbers yet. The other number that bears watching is the cost differential between a 777P2F and the A350F. Either way, the parking plan has to change.
Reply
Old 11-17-2021 | 04:07 PM
  #12  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,870
Likes: 85
Default A350F

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
Yes, but how far can it go with that load?
The Google sez A350F is spec’d at 4700nm range with 109 metric tons max payload.

For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload.
Reply
Old 11-17-2021 | 04:52 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 458
Likes: 52
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.
Yep. 777F has 105-106 metric ton payload capability until MZFW. About another 100T of fuel puts it at ramp weight.
Reply
Old 11-19-2021 | 03:13 PM
  #14  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
The Google sez A350F is spec’d at 4700nm range with 109 metric tons max payload.

For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload.
Why would I Google it when I can ask you?

Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal.
Reply
Old 11-21-2021 | 01:27 PM
  #15  
C17B74's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 2
From: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Default

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
Why would I Google it when I can ask you?

Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal.
All Good Stuff. 777 was tabled by Boeing to this customer and they went with the 350 anyway. Agree it probably wasn’t Purple, although like Cathay and another European outfit Fred has been a major if not one of the largest contributors for less to no pilots up front technology. Will no doubt take time, but the hunt is on like Donkey Kong with more and more interested parties and both manufacturers showcasing developments. Regulatory hurdles will slow the process some.
Reply
Old 11-24-2021 | 05:14 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: F/O
Default

I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.
Reply
Old 11-24-2021 | 10:27 PM
  #17  
C17B74's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 2
From: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Default

Originally Posted by Flybynight101
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.
Excellent, you have plenty of -8’s with a few more coming on line quickly followed by the Final 4 Atlas birds near the end of 2022. Definitely will be able to prove Ramp 6 capability in the near future.
Reply
Old 11-25-2021 | 12:02 AM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Flybynight101
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.

Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F.
It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them.
Reply
Old 11-25-2021 | 05:17 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 977
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by vprof
Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F.
It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them.

I think people question the ramp space when talking about replacing 40ish MDs vs adding a few 74s for peak. Those MDs are littered all over the wings, which obviously doesn’t work with just about any replacement.
Reply
Old 11-25-2021 | 01:14 PM
  #20  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: F/O
Default

Well I guess we’re screwed. There’s zero options then. I guess we’ll just keep the MD11 forever… lol

Again, I just laugh that people are 100% convinced that “nothing will fit in the wings…” therefore there are zero options…

Learn to be…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hedley Lamarr
FedEx
145
09-29-2022 08:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices