Search
Notices

MD11 Replacement??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2021, 04:55 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 38
Default MD11 Replacement??

https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...er-2021-07-29/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hedley Lamarr is offline  
Old 07-31-2021, 06:56 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley Lamarr View Post
Its the same size as a 777. Why would they replace it with something larger?
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 07-31-2021, 11:01 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 364
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
Its the same size as a 777. Why would they replace it with something larger?

Somewhat debatable in terms of lift and range (all theoretical with the 350 Cargo variant) but given the loads and outlook seems a reasonable replacement. It would pain me to fly an Airbus product but the cost savings in dry cleaning with the dinner tray could compensate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hoya saxa is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 01:16 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Ultimately what does it matter since they pay the same and the intention to replace internally is most important? Outside of that it could be any number of reasons from price, availability, weight savings, politics, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 09:10 AM
  #5  
Custom User Title
 
AZFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,270
Default

Same caveat that the A350F is not even a paper airplane yet, but in one of the articles I came across yesterday about it, it appears that the Airbus could have a very similar payload capability to the MD-11 and with more cargo volume. Combine with new aircraft reliability, fuel efficiency, etc...who knows what could happen.

https://cargofacts.com/airbus-nears-...ghter-program/
AZFlyer is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 06:57 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: BE-20, LR35
Posts: 266
Default

I could see us placing the first order simply to keep UPS or Amazon from getting them quickly. If we can push their deliveries off by 3-5 years, that’s a win.
Fr8Master is offline  
Old 08-01-2021, 08:05 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B757F CA
Posts: 408
Default

If the A330neo as an MD-11 replacement is not happening because the wingspan is bigger, then the A350 definitely isn't either.
IQuitEagle is offline  
Old 08-02-2021, 03:56 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by IQuitEagle View Post
If the A330neo as an MD-11 replacement is not happening because the wingspan is bigger, then the A350 definitely isn't either.
Yea at some point they have to make the decision either to just use more 767’s to replace the MD, which would use more spots as you need more 767’s to Carry what an MD does it just redo spots to fit modern aircrafts increased wingspans. Either way you have a parking spot issue.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 08-02-2021, 05:22 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,063
Default

Already using multiple 767 to cover the loss of the MDs in certain cities.
MEMA300 is offline  
Old 08-02-2021, 10:42 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8Master View Post
I could see us placing the first order simply to keep UPS or Amazon from getting them quickly. If we can push their deliveries off by 3-5 years, that’s a win.
https://investors.ups.com/news-event...or-analyst-day
“Carol Tomé: We're just taking a different look at how we allocate capital than in the past. Think about the growth that we're going to have outside of the United States. Most of that is asset light. Now we do need aircraft. The dollars that Brian described to you that we'll be spending over the next 3 years, we've got plans to acquire about 27 aircraft.

Some of that includes the big freighters that Scott needs to move cargo around the world. Some of it is actually replacing our older MD11 fleet. We've got about 40 MD11s. They’re average age -- they're the oldest aircraft we have in our fleet, the average age is up 27 years. So we're going to start to replace those aircraft at the end of this 3-year period. So that's just will almost become like maintenance spending, I think.

As you heard from Nando, we're expanding capacity by expanding weekend. We're not spending capital on that or we're spending some expense dollars. You might talk, Nando, what it means to expand the weekend.”
Precontact is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
Aviation Law
2
03-08-2017 07:45 PM
Roberto
Cargo
144
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 09:26 AM
1Seat 1Engine
Major
11
06-15-2007 05:20 AM
kaqhan
Hiring News
6
02-25-2006 10:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices