MD11 Replacement??
08-23-2021 | 01:38 PM
#21
Fill'er Up Again
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 1
From: Scarebus Captain
The bigger challenge is how they integrate Western Global after the purchase goes through….
08-23-2021 | 03:38 PM
#24
Living the SloBus life
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 92
I don’t think parking is as big deal as you seemed think. You do know that all the 400 gates didn’t always fit triples. Fedex will figure it out. It might not be cheap but they need a “real” replacement for the 11. If the A-350F fits that need then they will figure it out. If something better/different shows up then we will see that..
The bigger challenge is how they integrate Western Global after the purchase goes through….
The bigger challenge is how they integrate Western Global after the purchase goes through….
08-23-2021 | 04:56 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
The flight they do out of Ontario on Sunday has a backup 767 sitting there with a crew ready to go to protect the freight from Ontario and LAX that Western flies to Memphis.
08-24-2021 | 03:27 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
I don’t think parking is as big deal as you seemed think. You do know that all the 400 gates didn’t always fit triples. Fedex will figure it out. It might not be cheap but they need a “real” replacement for the 11. If the A-350F fits that need then they will figure it out. If something better/different shows up then we will see that..
But why buy the A350F when you could buy a 777F and get efficiencies with aircrew already trained and familiar with Boeing products?
08-24-2021 | 07:21 PM
#28
Custom User Title
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
One reason would be diversification of your 'portfolio'. If something happens that grounds a fleet or causes some other significant fleet impairment, the impact is lessened when you don't run a single fleet type. Your point is valid and a good one but someone has to weigh the obvious efficiencies of having fewer fleet types with the risks of having a larger portion of your operation effected when something goes wrong with that single large fleet. In the business of moving expensive time sensitive freight, I'd be leaning towards a mixed fleet.
08-24-2021 | 08:18 PM
#29
Gets Everyday Off
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
One reason would be diversification of your 'portfolio'. If something happens that grounds a fleet or causes some other significant fleet impairment, the impact is lessened when you don't run a single fleet type. Your point is valid and a good one but someone has to weigh the obvious efficiencies of having fewer fleet types with the risks of having a larger portion of your operation effected when something goes wrong with that single large fleet. In the business of moving expensive time sensitive freight, I'd be leaning towards a mixed fleet.
It seems to be most things that come up are either on the newest model or a check that can be done on overnights with 90 days (typically) to get them performed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
