![]() |
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3947839)
If you're referring to me, I missed the boomer generation by nearly 20 years.
This whole thing has the feel of FedEx and future dysfunction. Those I used to fly with said their biggest fear with all of this hiring is the past being forgotten and mistakes repeated. They may have been correct to feel that way. we can’t keep living in the past, airlines are fluid and so should we. Look at the optimizer, BOOM, how do we adapt to that with 2006 expertise? We have to adapt to change and start coming up with new and fresh ideas. Even the management from what I hear is not even close to the terror of the past. So come on, let’s be real, we have tons of talent with legacy experience. We can use new and old to come up with great results. not 700 dollars/$HR cus UPS won’t respect the language and we are run by truckers. Time to stop that BS |
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3947839)
If you're referring to me, I missed the boomer generation by nearly 20 years.
This whole thing has the feel of FedEx and future dysfunction. Those I used to fly with said their biggest fear with all of this hiring is the past being forgotten and mistakes repeated. They may have been correct to feel that way. |
Originally Posted by Brownose74
(Post 3947914)
We have to adapt to change and start coming up with new and fresh ideas.
|
Originally Posted by Brownose74
we can’t keep living in the past, airlines are fluid and so should we. Look at the optimizer, BOOM, how do we adapt to that with 2006 expertise?
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3948256)
You have a Scheduling Chair with multiple years of experience using it at a previous airline, that's how...
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3948256)
You have a Scheduling Chair with multiple years of experience using it at a previous airline, that's how...
|
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 3948857)
Is that the reason the previous chair was asked to resign?
|
Joachim, ,
You seem to come across as a bit of a snowflake. Why would you care if a retiree posts on the B&G?. And what do they say that seems to bother you so much?I’ve said it before, a retiree can convey information or opine on many subjects that can get an active line pilot fired. If an active pilot promotes a certain course of action, or inaction, he could get fired. If a retiree says the same thing, no repercussions. So why is allowing retiress’s access such a bad thing?. Chess not checkers. Read into some of the posts and try to decipher what is being said. |
Originally Posted by Vito
(Post 3952192)
Joachim, ,
You seem to come across as a bit of a snowflake. Why would you care if a retiree posts on the B&G?. And what do they say that seems to bother you so much?I’ve said it before, a retiree can convey information or opine on many subjects that can get an active line pilot fired. If an active pilot promotes a certain course of action, or inaction, he could get fired. If a retiree says the same thing, no repercussions. So why is allowing retiress’s access such a bad thing?. Chess not checkers. Read into some of the posts and try to decipher what is being said. |
Originally Posted by Vito
(Post 3952192)
Joachim, ,
You seem to come across as a bit of a snowflake. Why would you care if a retiree posts on the B&G?. And what do they say that seems to bother you so much?I’ve said it before, a retiree can convey information or opine on many subjects that can get an active line pilot fired. If an active pilot promotes a certain course of action, or inaction, he could get fired. If a retiree says the same thing, no repercussions. So why is allowing retiress’s access such a bad thing?. Chess not checkers. Read into some of the posts and try to decipher what is being said. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands