Originally Posted by Cocoloco (Post 3740268)

What are u worried about? FDX is a monster Internationally. Do u fly Intl with FDX? They outnumber UPS at every major gateway by 3x. CRK has 4 wide bodies to UPS 1. NRT has 9 WB on the Ramp to UPS 2. KIX 6 WB's to UPS 2. SIN has 3 to UPS 1. You want me going?? I can go on with a dozen more. FDX may have a weak Scope, but it isn't affecting there footprint at all.

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender (Post 3740356)

Seems a little short sighted. Fred wanted every little box on a purple tail. Not sure that’s the case moving forward, but you go with that.

Originally Posted by Riverside (Post 3740390)

How many Ups 737's do you see flying around Europe? That's the problem.

Originally Posted by Meeko (Post 3740472)

So because our weak scope isnt effecting our footprint we should just leave the scope weak? Yeahhhh that type of thinking has never ended poorly for a pilot group in the past before......

Originally Posted by Cocoloco (Post 3740609)

I will Swede. Obviously u havent been outside of the US flying. FDX is bigger now than before Fred retired at Intl. Airports. I see it daily. This sky isn't falling because of their weak scope doesnt match reality. Even in CGN they have three planes a night at our Hub. We have one plane in CDG.

Originally Posted by Cocoloco (Post 3740614)

Really??? We have a compnay called Star Airlines. With about 20 767's flying intra europe and Greece.

Originally Posted by airplanes (Post 3740676)

How do they get away with this with our “awesome” scope?

Originally Posted by Cocoloco (Post 3740619)

Your weak scope hasn't hurt you yet.

Originally Posted by Cocoloco (Post 3740614)

Really??? We have a compnay called Star Airlines. With about 20 767's flying intra europe and Greece.

Originally Posted by Riverside (Post 3740963)

yeah, there's a reason for that you know🙄