![]() |
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3741018)
Regarding Greece, why would FedEx be able to fly 757’s and MD-11’s to Greece, but not UPS?
|
Originally Posted by Riverside
(Post 3741047)
I didn't know Ups had a presence in Greece. Where does FedEx operate the 75 out of?
FedEx used to fly CGN-ATH-TLV on the 757. ATH then got shifted to the MD. Route was CDG-ATH-DBX. Not sure what the service is now. |
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3741018)
Regarding Greece, why would FedEx be able to fly 757’s and MD-11’s to Greece, but not UPS?
FDX has route authorities from their purchase of Flying Tigers that have a lot more flexibly as far as cabotage goes. After ww2 pan am, twa, and Tigers had those authorities. I know united got the pan am authorities and for a while operated a hub in LHR, but code sharing with the star alliance put a stop to that. Finally as a point of information, unless it's changed, the only routes we are guaranteed under our scope were the trunk routes and the original 727 city pairs. The rest ups operates if it makes sense to their business plan. Believe it or not, they do like to fly as much on the brown tails as they can. |
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3741071)
Ah. I thought the other poster was implying Star Airlines was running freight for UPS through Greece. I figured that meant that Euro cabotage laws prevented UPS from doing that flying or that UPS couldn’t get the route authority.
FedEx used to fly CGN-ATH-TLV on the 757. ATH then got shifted to the MD. Route was CDG-ATH-DBX. Not sure what the service is now. |
Originally Posted by 767pilot
(Post 3741218)
We could fly to Greece if ups wanted to. They tend to route the aircraft in such a way as to include a cabotage leg on star's and I suppose mng's flying in a way that preclude us. A few years back when Bob Miller was running the show I remember something happened that put Greece and Iceland on the horizon for us to fly. UPS quickly put the kybosh on that.
FDX has route authorities from their purchase of Flying Tigers that have a lot more flexibly as far as cabotage goes. After ww2 pan am, twa, and Tigers had those authorities. I know united got the pan am authorities and for a while operated a hub in LHR, but code sharing with the star alliance put a stop to that. Finally as a point of information, unless it's changed, the only routes we are guaranteed under our scope were the trunk routes and the original 727 city pairs. The rest ups operates if it makes sense to their business plan. Believe it or not, they do like to fly as much on the brown tails as they can. |
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3741348)
Excellent write up. Thanks for the history. Always interesting to hear how those routes get divvied up and who wins the route authority battles. Seems like most of the international fifth freedom rights are hard to come by these days.
|
Is it still called "scope" here at UPS if our brown tail airplanes are being flown by people not on our seniority list?
|
Originally Posted by MidwestMaster
(Post 3741503)
Is it still called "scope" here at UPS if our brown tail airplanes are being flown by people not on our seniority list?
|
While I'm far from one of the union "cheerleaders", I'm happy to give credit where it's due. Improved language on mgmt flying was one of the big wins of the 2016 contract & it's not one that's talked bout much or something that the NC/EB gets a whole lot of credit for. Scope is certainly one of the items where our contract is truly "industry leading".
|
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 3741543)
While I'm far from one of the union "cheerleaders", I'm happy to give credit where it's due. Improved language on mgmt flying was one of the big wins of the 2016 contract & it's not one that's talked bout much or something that the NC/EB gets a whole lot of credit for. Scope is certainly one of the items where our contract is truly "industry leading".
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands