My S2000 in High Dynamic Range (HDR)

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 3

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-21-2009, 12:32 PM

#11

Herb Flemmming

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jun 2009

Posts: 441

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotshot

It still has 2 fewer doors and is slower than my STI

stock........

12-21-2009, 03:37 PM

#12

JoeyMeatballs

Banned

Thread Starter

Joined APC: Jan 2006

Position: A-320

Posts: 6,929

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotshot

It still has 2 fewer doors and is slower than my STI

Nice ride (picture is blurry though)

my S2000 at the moment is actually a lot slower than a stock S2000, haha

I lowered the compression with a 3mm headgasket in anticipation of a Twinscroll GT35r on Water/meth, tuned on Q16 hello 650RWHP...........

PS at least my car doesnt look like a refrigerator on its side with a park bench as a wing

12-22-2009, 12:55 AM

#13

Dubes

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Aug 2008

Posts: 277

That S2000 is soooo clean! I have a friend who has a stock S2000, and it hauls arse everywhere. I need a new car

12-22-2009, 12:59 AM

#14

Photon

Blue Skies

Joined APC: Aug 2006

Position: C208B

Posts: 778

What kind of program and settings did you use to get a HDR like that?

12-22-2009, 05:49 AM

#15

JoeyMeatballs

Banned

Thread Starter

Joined APC: Jan 2006

Position: A-320

Posts: 6,929

Quote:

Originally Posted by Photon

What kind of program and settings did you use to get a HDR like that?

I use a program called "photomatix". Basically use a tripod take 3 exposures

One under exposed, one at proper exposure, and one overexposed, then merge them together using the above program.

12-22-2009, 07:51 AM

#16

Mitragorz

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jul 2007

Position: C402, on the side with the switches!

Posts: 433

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs

I use a program called "photomatix". Basically use a tripod take 3 exposures

One under exposed, one at proper exposure, and one overexposed, then merge them together using the above program.

What range do you use, -2, 0, +2?

12-22-2009, 12:16 PM

#17

Herb Flemmming

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jun 2009

Posts: 441

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs

I lowered the compression with a 3mm headgasket

With the money youve put in why not go pistons? your power goal on 3mm head gasket seems dangerous, but im a Nissan guy i come from the 1.5 world

Brakes/suspension > engine

12-22-2009, 03:59 PM

#18

meeko031

alchemist

Joined APC: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,089

you're missing a front mount intercooler to fill that gap..

12-22-2009, 08:49 PM

#19

JoeyMeatballs

Banned

Thread Starter

Joined APC: Jan 2006

Position: A-320

Posts: 6,929

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herb Flemmming

With the money youve put in why not go pistons? your power goal on 3mm head gasket seems dangerous, but im a Nissan guy i come from the 1.5 world

Brakes/suspension > engine

Yeah, if/when I blow this motor (its pretty strong, pistons come forges for the factory) but the 3mm Headgasket is a lot cheaper then a built block and has been pretty reliable. On Q16 I should have no problem making well into 600, on pump gas an Meth alone I should be mid 500's