Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Another SIC question.. >

Another SIC question..

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Another SIC question..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2015, 06:45 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
badtransam97's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 462
Default Another SIC question..

Sorry to beat a dead horse guys, but there is a company Im looking at going to work for that is utilizing Phenom aircraft, and they want two pilots on board. I have researched the threads on here, and still am unsure about it all.
The company is a fractional type outfit, and all flights are done under part 91 to the best of my knowledge. The CA's all hold single pilot type certs for the 100's and 300's. My question arises from one of the posts I saw under the sticky in this section regarding logging SIC time. In that sticky, he references a "FAA Flight Standardization Board report" for the Phenom aircraft. He stated that one who held a single pilot type cert, could elect to use a SIC if he so wanted..I have copied and pasted the portion I believe he is talking about, and wanted to get some better clarification on it, so here is it:

"4.1.1 EMB-505

The EMB-505 type rating is approved for pilots who satisfactorily complete the type rating practical test in the EMB‑505 as a single pilot. A pilot with the EMB-505 type rating may operate the aircraft as a single pilot, or operate as a pilot in command (PIC) with a second in command (SIC) on the aircraft.

A pilot with the EMB-505 type rating must have a SIC in the aircraft if it lacks an operative autopilot system, headset mounted microphone, or flight director. AFM Limitations require a SIC under these conditions. If this circumstance arises, the PIC must comply with the PIC proficiency check requirements specified by § 61.58, and use a SIC that meets the qualification and training requirements of § 61.55."

Only reason I am concerned is, if I go to work there, sure I will get great experience and get paid, but how would I ever build any more flight time towards upgrading, and/or better jobs down the road if I can't log any time...Thanks again for the info!
badtransam97 is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 07:27 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

It's not another question, it's the same question.

If the TCDS requires a SIC or if the regs the aircraft is operated under require a SIC you can log the time. The TCDS lists the MEL items that require a SIC in lieu of the inop system. If the regs, part 135 or 91.531, require a SIC you can log the time. However, if it's just the "company" or more likely the insurance company that requires a SIC you're out of luck.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 10:58 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
badtransam97's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 462
Default

So the above mentioned is useless info then it sounds like. I understood the whole inop equip deal needing a SIC, as well as if 135 req one, just was wondering how and if it played into the statements I had quoted above. Sorry to trick you with the thread title ;)
badtransam97 is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 01:15 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

EMB-505"S" = single pilot type

EMB-505 with
"Second-In-Command Required"
(limitation) is the other possibility depending on practical test circumstances.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 01:29 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

I think your luck - if there is any in this situation - will lie in the regulations under which the company operates.
Do many fractionals operate under P91 rules (not P91K) - meaning the operators that operate under P91K still have regs/OPSPECs requiring the use of SIC correct?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 04:24 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
badtransam97's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 462
Default

From what I can gather, they operate under pt91, not 91k
badtransam97 is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 04:35 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by badtransam97 View Post
From what I can gather, they operate under pt91, not 91k
And you are sure they are a FRACTIONAL?
The company is a fractional type outfit, and all flights are done under part 91 to the best of my knowledge.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 05:41 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hemaybedid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 247
Default

If an aircraft requires two pilots, with the exception that a pic may have a single pilot qualification, that is an exception not the norm. A qualified sic on an aircraft requiring two pilots can log sic time, regardless of the pic's single pilot qualification.
hemaybedid is offline  
Old 07-16-2015, 05:54 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
badtransam97's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
And you are sure they are a FRACTIONAL?
Im really not too sure what they are lol! Im new to the whole fractional /charter whatever game ;)

Here is the company in question Innovative Private Air Travel Programs | Nicholas Air
badtransam97 is offline  
Old 07-17-2015, 05:22 AM
  #10  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Phenom 300/CE-525A
Posts: 7
Default

The only time an SIC is currently required for Nicholas Air is the autopilot is inop or another inop item requires an SIC in the MEL. Currently, if the aircraft is flown Part 135, the only pilot listed on the manifest is the PIC and the other pilot is a flight observer.
Phenom300Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Horizon Air
53
07-17-2014 01:24 PM
sinsilvia666
Aviation Law
60
09-13-2012 04:26 AM
ce650
Corporate
1
08-11-2012 06:43 PM
zoinkers
Part 135
12
06-15-2008 07:44 PM
MarkG
Corporate
1
08-27-2006 06:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices