Search
Notices

FedEx Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2015, 10:34 PM
  #751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,671
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15 View Post
What I will say is every time I have ever heard "we are going to hire 500", etc, we seem to stop at the 80% or so mark of the target.
Or less, WAY LESS.

At a FAPA job fair in the spring of 2011, FedEx made an impromptu/unexpected appearance. The pilot "recruiter" said "we're going to hire 500 in the next year".

Take a look at the seniority list, and how many have been hired SINCE the spring of 2011? Or rather, from spring 2011 to spring 2012.
John Carr is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 04:19 PM
  #752  
Family First
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15 View Post
Let me put it in perspective. Four or five years ago our VP of flight ops discussed in an email to crew force a possibility of MD11s being based in HKG.

Last week in captain's class he said "…expect the bid end of this week, or early next week at the latest…" It was out the next day.

Not trying to disparage anyone, just pointing out when we cannot get a straight answer from the VP of flight ops (…likely because many business decisions come above from finance, etc) asking a FedEx pilot for SA on hiring, staffing, future plans, etc is a joke. We hear rumors, we hear informed opinions, and sometimes we even get a few facts. Facts, however, are usually only days, if not mere hours…before its out on the street anyway. Point is a FedEx pilot rarely knows anymore than most of the folks in the line at OBAP or WAI about what is going on in pilot hiring or recruitment. We aren't being jerks--they don't tell us anything. Thinking they do just makes our inner cynic come alive.

This place hires in spurts…afterburner, idle, afterburner, idle… I understand how challenging predicting business can be. At the same time, I've been here 13 years and have about 1500-1600 behind me. Retirements are predicted to be 100-200 a year. Seems like a slow, steady hiring of 10-20 a month would not overwhelm the training pipeline, would allow for future retirements and still be able to absorb some of the sine waves of the business. When you manage to meet short term financial targets, however, there will be a whipsaw at times. Efficiency is not key when trying to please shareholders for the quarter or meet an MBO bonus target. So--its going to be crazy again for a while, and most of us who work there have no good SA on when it will start and end. What I will say is every time I have ever heard "we are going to hire 500", etc, we seem to stop at the 80% or so mark of the target. Maybe this time will be different, but if you want to join this place don't wait around to apply or get your app in. We stop hiring on a dime too, and have closed up shop for years several times since I've been here.

I've been on the line eight years, I have 300-350 behind me
bear2duby is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 04:42 PM
  #753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MeXC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Bear, you and I missed a bunch of numbers by only a few months to a year. Timing. Is. Everything.
MeXC is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 05:09 PM
  #754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by MeXC View Post
Bear, you and I missed a bunch of numbers by only a few months to a year. Timing. Is. Everything.

And ... everyone on the property lost 5 years seniority (about 150 retirements a year when AGE 65 happened and almost nobody retired for the next 5 years!*?

That was a bad deal for everyone except the folks that got an unexpected windfall to get serious about their retirement savings. They also got an extra 5 years to try to find a hobby that they enjoyed more than hub turning in the middle of the night!*?

Would we have a new Contract now if everyone that turned 60 had been forced to retire? Would we ALL be 750 numbers more senior? I wonder every monthly bid, every vacation bid, every training bid, every seat bid ... what would have happened if ...


MaydayMark is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 06:43 PM
  #755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pig on the wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
And ... everyone on the property lost 5 years seniority (about 150 retirements a year when AGE 65 happened and almost nobody retired for the next 5 years!*?

That was a bad deal for everyone except the folks that got an unexpected windfall to get serious about their retirement savings. They also got an extra 5 years to try to find a hobby that they enjoyed more than hub turning in the middle of the night!*?

Would we have a new Contract now if everyone that turned 60 had been forced to retire? Would we ALL be 750 numbers more senior? I wonder every monthly bid, every vacation bid, every training bid, every seat bid ... what would have happened if ...


Good god bro, get over it. Find some other windmill to tilt upon.
pig on the wing is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 08:48 PM
  #756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 296
Default

[QUOTE=MaydayMark;1882942]And ... everyone on the property lost 5 years seniority (about 150 retirements a year when AGE 65 happened and almost nobody retired for the next 5 years!*?

And age 65 gave EVERYONE 5 more years. That's 5 more years to contribute to a 401K and 5 more years to get to 25yrs. Guys keep complaining about what seat upgrade they lost, well the same numbers are going to retire just 5 years later. The same opportunities will be there unless the wide body fleet is reduced. The bad thing about going 5 more years is hoping your health will be fine. But you now have the option to leave at 60 or 65.
Viper446 is offline  
Old 05-17-2015, 09:04 PM
  #757  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
Default

[QUOTE=Viper446;1883027]
Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
And ... everyone on the property lost 5 years seniority (about 150 retirements a year when AGE 65 happened and almost nobody retired for the next 5 years!*?

And age 65 gave EVERYONE 5 more years. That's 5 more years to contribute to a 401K and 5 more years to get to 25yrs. Guys keep complaining about what seat upgrade they lost, well the same numbers are going to retire just 5 years later. The same opportunities will be there unless the wide body fleet is reduced. The bad thing about going 5 more years is hoping your health will be fine. But you now have the option to leave at 60 or 65.
Viper - that's about the most ignorant post I've ever read here. Hope you are joking.
Tuck is offline  
Old 05-18-2015, 03:48 AM
  #758  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,227
Default

So when the university wants my son's tuition check, I'll just say, "Hey I don't have it now, but I will in five years, so I'm good for it...."
Huck is offline  
Old 05-18-2015, 04:11 AM
  #759  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJocF14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-777 Captain
Posts: 943
Default

[QUOTE=MaydayMark;1882942]And ... everyone on the property lost 5 years seniority (about 150 retirements a year when AGE 65 happened and almost nobody retired for the next 5 years!*?

That was a bad deal for everyone except the folks that got an unexpected windfall to get serious about their retirement savings. They also got an extra 5 years to try to find a hobby that they enjoyed more than hub turning in the middle of the night!*?

Would we have a new Contract now if everyone that turned 60 had been forced to retire? Would we ALL be 750 numbers more senior? I wonder every monthly bid, every vacation bid, every training bid, every seat bid ... what would have happened if ...

So your saying your gonna leave when you turn 60.
JetJocF14 is offline  
Old 05-18-2015, 05:16 AM
  #760  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,063
Default

If you want to enjoy the best 5 years of your career, you have to stay to 65.
Last 5 years are when you make the most money (unless you have been a draft pilot) and have the most seniority. The guys who were in their late 50's had a 5 year extension on the best part of their career. Younger junior guys had a 5 year extension on the worst part of their career.

You can tell what side of coin people are on by their excuses of how it was good for everybody. "Hey you got an extra 5 years too". Well I got an extra 5 years of being an FO, not a Sr. wide body Capt and that aint the same.
MEMA300 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
charleyvarrick
Cargo
34
08-27-2011 11:10 AM
767pilot
Cargo
113
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
forgot to bid
Cargo
6
09-30-2009 09:59 PM
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 08:56 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
4
09-17-2005 12:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices